RE: explicit primary photo

RE: explicit primary photo (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid

Message

mnottertail -> RE: explicit primary photo (6/4/2013 1:35:55 PM)
Well quit fucking around put it on your second picture, lets get a look at it and see if we want to throw you off the site, or you can switch it to primary. Goddamm, enough fucking around.

Arturas -> RE: explicit primary photo (6/4/2013 1:42:21 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: TheLilSquaw quote: ORIGINAL: Arturas ..and I don't mean to imply you were. I just added that just in case. to answer your question, I would suggest a dirty toilet is explicit if you want to be one, blood covered needles if you are into needle play, a horse in heat if you are into, horses. However, again, serious Doms will not be impressed by gapping holes, breasts in their faces or dirty toilets and that is okay if you are not looking to impress but to simply be explicit for your own needs. Again who are YOU to say what a "serious dom" will be impressed by. You can say what YOU would be impressed by but can you honestly make a general statement that speaks for every other dom? (obviously you can but..) And again... where did you get the idea that "impressing" a dom was my intent? Heck why would that even get factored in to what qualifies as explicit? Lmfcao I can give an opinion about serious doms after knowing many personally. I don't have the idea you are trying to impress Doms. Perhaps others are trying to impress Doms and the subject is very credible for that audience.

SylvereApLeanan -> RE: explicit primary photo (6/4/2013 1:44:00 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: TheLilSquaw Obviously genitals or gaping holes qualify but where is that line drawn? For me, "no explicit photos" means no genitals or anus showing at all, this includes those that are "covered" by chastity devices or see-through garments, no penetration of any kind, including penetration by toys, and no bodily fluids/excretions except sweat and saliva.

tazzygirl -> RE: explicit primary photo (6/4/2013 1:47:53 PM)
I have seen saliva pulled as well. And penetration with dildos kept... provided its done tastefully.

mnottertail -> RE: explicit primary photo (6/4/2013 1:48:42 PM)
and sucking, thats tasteful, in all respects.

TheLilSquaw -> RE: explicit primary photo (6/4/2013 1:49:43 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl I have seen saliva pulled as well. And penetration with dildos kept... provided its done tastefully. I'm curious as to how saliva is explicit.

tazzygirl -> RE: explicit primary photo (6/4/2013 1:50:39 PM)
Because how does one prove its saliva and not cum? Instead of dealing with the argument, it simply goes.

TheLilSquaw -> RE: explicit primary photo (6/4/2013 1:50:46 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail and sucking, thats tasteful, in all respects. Especially if its you getting sucked huh? [;)]

mnottertail -> RE: explicit primary photo (6/4/2013 1:50:54 PM)
I dont see anything wrong with them. But I aint your average motherfucker. Which # were you thinking of making primary? You prolly cant use the one with the guys sealclubber in there as your primary.

TheLilSquaw -> RE: explicit primary photo (6/4/2013 1:53:56 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl Because how does one prove its saliva and not cum? Instead of dealing with the argument, it simply goes. So basically there is no stead fast determination (other than the obvious) what is explicit and what isn't? So one mod could find it perfectly okay while another may pull it.

LadyPact -> RE: explicit primary photo (6/4/2013 1:55:28 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SylvereApLeanan For me, "no explicit photos" means no genitals or anus showing at all, this includes those that are "covered" by chastity devices or see-through garments, no penetration of any kind, including penetration by toys, and no bodily fluids/excretions except sweat and saliva. I agree with this. As to others who assumed the primary photo was supposed to be appealing to Doms, from being familiar with LilSquaw and her posts, that wouldn't have been My first assumption that she wanted for the pic. I'd have said that she wanted the pic to be a reflection of something she enjoys and/or something that showed a reality based shot of one of her scenes. Since she does photo/video shoots often, I'm thinking she would like to have that side displayed, rather than it supposedly be used for imaginary 'seeking' when she already has a primary partner.

TheLilSquaw -> RE: explicit primary photo (6/4/2013 1:56:53 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail I dont see anything wrong with them. But I aint your average motherfucker. Which # were you thinking of making primary? You prolly cant use the one with the guys sealclubber in there as your primary. Seal Clubber? hehehe That a cute term! I changed it, guess time will tell. I didn't use one with his seal clubber showing even though it wasn't in your face.

mnottertail -> RE: explicit primary photo (6/4/2013 1:59:57 PM)
What you guys think? May not get alotta subbing jobs after this, but WTF? , Hah?

TheLilSquaw -> RE: explicit primary photo (6/4/2013 2:03:52 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LadyPact As to others who assumed the primary photo was supposed to be appealing to Doms, from being familiar with LilSquaw and her posts, that wouldn't have been My first assumption that she wanted for the pic. I'd have said that she wanted the pic to be a reflection of something she enjoys and/or something that showed a reality based shot of one of her scenes. Since she does photo/video shoots often, I'm thinking she would like to have that side displayed, rather than it supposedly be used for imaginary 'seeking' when she already has a primary partner. LP you are totally correct. :)

mnottertail -> RE: explicit primary photo (6/4/2013 2:05:16 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: TheLilSquaw I didn't use one with his seal clubber showing even though it wasn't in your face. Well if you had sort of covered it up some, maybe say....with your mouth, it might have been acceptable. Dunno. And as for mine? That the maximum they could charge me with would be decent exposure

TheLilSquaw -> RE: explicit primary photo (6/4/2013 2:06:57 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail What you guys think? May not get alotta subbing jobs after this, but WTF? , Hah? Lol Posting a picture that is seen as dominant or submissive can always kill it for switches. Personally I don't see activities as dominant or submissive but eh.. my mileage varies from many people. ETA: I have a picture with his seal clubber hidden with my mouth on the other site. To ME that isn't explicit but that is why I asked my original question.

lizi -> RE: explicit primary photo (6/4/2013 2:11:31 PM)
Totally off topic....eeep! Holy cow girl, you look amazing! Congrats on the weight loss!! Geez, I hadn't peeked at you for a while, I honestly hardly recognized you. Great job [:)]

TheLilSquaw -> RE: explicit primary photo (6/4/2013 2:16:03 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: lizi Totally off topic....eeep! Holy cow girl, you look amazing! Congrats on the weight loss!! Geez, I hadn't peeked at you for a while, I honestly hardly recognized you. Great job [:)] Thank you! May sound odd but EVERY time I see a new picture or video I have the same reaction. Like holy shit... is that really me? When I look at older and new pictures side by side it doesn't even look like the same person. (to me)

CynthiaWVirginia -> RE: explicit primary photo (6/4/2013 2:20:47 PM)
quote: Another question..... If the mods have an issue with a primary photo, do they send a gold letter or just pull a profile? No gold note, the primary pic would just be deleted. I was surprised to find out that anus pix were okay, even with butt plugs in them, but that penis and/or scrotum in the primary pic was not. (Mod21 said something about it in the boards a year or two ago when several of us were complaining about a guy with an "impaled butthole" primary pic.) Pussy pix were okay, as long as it's not of a gaping vaginal hole (not talking about gaping vulva cuz labia majora are spread open), and/or with cum dripping all over it. Urine, cum shots, vomit, and bowel movement pix don't stay up for long, but I've seen ones with a little blood staying up.

TheLilSquaw -> RE: explicit primary photo (6/4/2013 2:24:46 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: CynthiaWVirginia quote: Another question..... If the mods have an issue with a primary photo, do they send a gold letter or just pull a profile? No gold note, the primary pic would just be deleted. I was surprised to find out that anus pix were okay, even with butt plugs in them, but that penis and/or scrotum in the primary pic was not. (Mod21 said something about it in the boards a year or two ago when several of us were complaining about a guy with an "impaled butthole" primary pic.) Pussy pix were okay, as long as it's not of a gaping vaginal hole (not talking about gaping vulva cuz labia majora are spread open), and/or with cum dripping all over it. Urine, cum shots, vomit, and bowel movement pix don't stay up for long, but I've seen ones with a little blood staying up. I've seen blood ones as a primary. I always thought anal plugs was out for primary. (wow) So a picture of a woman standing nude is fine but a picture of a guy standing nude will probably get pulled? ETA: I admit more than before I think the term explicit is broad and is open to a lot of interpretation.

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 4 5 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875