GrizzlyBear
Posts: 278
Joined: 3/26/2004 From: Missoula Montana Status: offline
|
Does current Texas law go too far in allowing deadly force over property crimes? I think so. But its is the current law. Should that law apply over an alleged contract to perform an illegal act? It probably should not, and it could certainly be argued that it should not. Sounds to me like the prosecution did a really lousy job of countering the argument by the defense. The jury therefore bought the argument by the defense. Usually it goes the other way. Since the jury voted to acquit, the prosecutor doesn't get a do-over. No double jeopardy in the US, unlike in some other countries. Now the prosecutors (and many others as well) are whining about the outcome that resulted from the poor job they did. Suck it up, buttercup, and do a better job next time. Or are you only able to out-debate an overworked and disinterested public defender who is carrying way too many cases? I also have a feeling that we are not getting all the factors that may have influenced the jury. We saw pictures of the defendant, so we know he is white. I didn't read every news story, but there was no mention of the race composition of the jury, nor that of the deceased and her "pimp". If you search on her name, you can find a picture - not black, but she definitely appears to be darker of skin than the defendant. That of course should not matter, but in much of Texas it certainly does.
_____________________________
GrizzlyBear "Come to the edge," he said. They said, "We are afraid." "Come to the edge," he said. They came. He pushed them. And they flew. ~Guillaume Apollinaire
|