BitYakin
Posts: 882
Joined: 10/15/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Politesub53 quote:
ORIGINAL: Yachtie quote:
ORIGINAL: Politesub53 Question time then chaps......... How would you enforce an effective surveillence system to halt another 9/11, or would you just figure that as the cost of having no state surveillence ? Obama was 100% correct, you cant have both, as idyllic as it sounds. Therein lies part of the problem, PS. You've bought into the offered why. You have been conquered, because it's not about ~9/11. It is, though, about YOU. Just as I thought, no answer to my actual question. ok I'll answer and you and others will call me names the question is how do we enforce survielence or do we give up on it, in a nutshell I'll say the SAME thing I said right after 9/11 we DO NOTHING DIFFERANT, cause the moment we CHANGED our lives we admitted DEFEAT they are TERRORISTS, and the moment we started checking under EVERY ROCK for a potential DANGER we admitted we were IN TERROR... MISSION ACOMLISHED when you REACT to terror you admit you are terrorised! my kids used to SCREAM when they got mad or didn't get thier way, soo I'd ask em that the BEST YOU CAN DO and I'd scream then tell em ok now you scream didn't take long before they realized screaming disn't bother me at all and they stopped so with ALL the things we have done has terrorism STOPPED? NOOO and why because we do exactly what they want us to do, we REACT to it! we COMPRAMISE OUR VALUES to accomdate their stimuli
|