sunshinemiss -> RE: Attractive Dominant Men Are Hard To Find (7/29/2013 9:37:44 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: AWingedGuardian B) Why the appearance of a Dominant should matter, exactly? Tossing superficial desires aside, isn't it the personality of a Dominant that is the most appealing? For some people, yes. And yes, the more I like someone, the better looking they become. However, I am clear that I want a man who is athletic, intelligent, creative, and bilingual. If he is missing any of those things, I eventually get bored and can dance circles around him. Even if he has the best personality on the planet, he's not going to be able to keep up with me. Sure we can all hope for bodies like Brad Pitt or David Beckham, but in the end why are we being the source of eye candy? That isn't our role. Bullshit. If you aren't attractive, you are not gonna give me a wettie, plain and simple. Some men think that they don't need to look good, don't need to dress for dates, don't need to care for their bodies and health. That's just utter nonsense. Damn right I want a man that I look at and totally objectify every now and then. Hell yes, I want to look at that fine ass and enjoy it... feel my mouth water as he takes off his shirt... get all tingly when he moves just so. And hoping does nothing. You want a body like X person? Get off the couch, lift some weights, do some exercise, put the beer and banana nut muffin down. Fine men come in all types of contours. But the man who isn't aware of his role as eye candy (along with other roles) is simply deluding himself. C) You would make such posts under the naivety that people won't have anything negative to respond with? An individual isn't able to throw the word "attractive" around and claim there aren't any people that fit that description. Why? It's a relative term. It's subjective. One person may find a clean cut, trim, smiling man in a suit. Another may prefer a person with tattoos, piercings, and long hair. Another may find an individual "attractive" who is rather "average" by societal standards. Why? Because they find it "attractive" to be able to be comfortable around that person. Fair enough... but generally speaking "not taking care of the old temple" is NOT gonna be considered attractive. That's simply built into us. So why, exactly. Was this topic posted here in the first place? Because someone had a relevant request / question and asked it.
|
|
|
|