quote:

ORIGINAL: Rawni



I love these threads.

quote:

ORIGINAL: OsideGirl

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rawni



I love these threads.

Yeah, these are always fun to watch. Especially after Alpha's last post on the subject.

quote:

ORIGINAL: TNDommeK

quote:

ORIGINAL: OsideGirl

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rawni



I love these threads.

Yeah, these are always fun to watch. Especially after Alpha's last post on the subject.

I'm lost....as usual.

quote:

For some reason, users on this website are having trouble viewing my profile. They keep telling me that it's not showing up

Any ideas?

quote:

ORIGINAL: TNDommeK

quote:

ORIGINAL: OsideGirl

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rawni



I love these threads.

Yeah, these are always fun to watch. Especially after Alpha's last post on the subject.

I'm lost....as usual.

quote:

ORIGINAL: VideoAdminAlpha

Let’s see if I can put it in a diplomatic and non- accusatory manner(we wouldn’t want the OP to think it was directed at them among others, would we?) THERE IS NO SYSTEM GLITCH. There have been different reasons why the posters that wrote had problems. POSSIBLY, they might(or might not ) have violated tos, had (or didn’t have) pictures that they had highly questionable right to use, named (or did not name) other posters in blacklisting fashions or created(or didn’t create) huge walls of shame on said other profiles. POSSIBLY, they thought that support was dumb enough not to catch it. POSSIBLY, they thought that they would just start up numerous other accounts, and the staff and system would not catch the link to those other accounts, because those accounts may or may not be currently active. It would also appear that POSSIBLY, they are aware that the users cannot answer their question, but MAYBE, if they scream loud enough, that the OTHER posters would assume they were lily white and look over the fact that the absence of a visible profile might cause concern as to the veracity of the current poster. POSSIBLY, that is why support is in no hurry to respond to those posters because the statistical probability has shown in the past that instead of correcting said problems, and acting within tos, they will argue the point incessantly and continue to exhibit the same behavior. (This is in no way of course, directed to the OP, its just what some of the possibilities MIGHT be)

quote:

ORIGINAL: VideoAdminChi

quote:

ORIGINAL: TNDommeK

quote:

ORIGINAL: OsideGirl

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rawni



I love these threads.

Yeah, these are always fun to watch. Especially after Alpha's last post on the subject.

I'm lost....as usual.

Not saying this applies to this OP, but this is the post to which OsideGirl refers:

http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=4445958

quote:

ORIGINAL: VideoAdminAlpha

Let’s see if I can put it in a diplomatic and non- accusatory manner(we wouldn’t want the OP to think it was directed at them among others, would we?) THERE IS NO SYSTEM GLITCH. There have been different reasons why the posters that wrote had problems. POSSIBLY, they might(or might not ) have violated tos, had (or didn’t have) pictures that they had highly questionable right to use, named (or did not name) other posters in blacklisting fashions or created(or didn’t create) huge walls of shame on said other profiles. POSSIBLY, they thought that support was dumb enough not to catch it. POSSIBLY, they thought that they would just start up numerous other accounts, and the staff and system would not catch the link to those other accounts, because those accounts may or may not be currently active. It would also appear that POSSIBLY, they are aware that the users cannot answer their question, but MAYBE, if they scream loud enough, that the OTHER posters would assume they were lily white and look over the fact that the absence of a visible profile might cause concern as to the veracity of the current poster. POSSIBLY, that is why support is in no hurry to respond to those posters because the statistical probability has shown in the past that instead of correcting said problems, and acting within tos, they will argue the point incessantly and continue to exhibit the same behavior. (This is in no way of course, directed to the OP, its just what some of the possibilities MIGHT be)