tazzygirl
Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
And some (ahem) think banning picture techniques will help those with low self esteem pretend this kind of beauty doesn't exist or is unobtainable. Just because some can't obtain it doesn't make it unobtainable and it definitely does exist. Don't hide it. Show me. Show me a model who doesnt need to have her photos touched and I will concede your point. If you cant, then its a false portrayal, despite the contention that its "ok" because some may look like that. Especially in light of at least 90% of the models dont look like that, but you wouldnt know that by the photos. quote:
You don't get rid of this level of beauty. You get OVER it. Educate the youth on the reality of media. But I doubt that the youth suffering from eating disorders because they don't know that magazine pictures are airbrushed. You are extremely wrong. http://www.edreferral.com/body_image.htm#Dying to Fit In TUESDAY, DECEMBER 07, 2010 MENTAL HEALTH EXPERTS CALL FOR WARNING LABELS ON AIRBRUSHED PHOTOS Britain's Royal College of Psychiatrists has published a statement calling for warning labels on airbrushed photos of models and celebrities, and for a ban on underweight models at London Fashion Week. The college's call to action urges the government as well as the media and fashion industries to take greater responsibility in the fight against eating disorders. The college believes that labels on photos would help to raise awareness of how widespread photo manipulation is, and to dissuade people from attempting to achieve "unattainable physical perfection." The college also urged the British government to establish a forum, made up of politicians, experts and representatives from the media and advertising, for the development of an editorial ethical code. Dr. Adrienne Key of the college's eating disorders section said the media must be prevented from "glamorizing" excessive weight loss and exacerbating the psychological and social pressures faced by young people. She commented: "What we need to do is raise people's awareness of what they are looking at. A lot of people have no idea how much manipulation goes on. The aims of the forum should be to collaboratively develop an ethical editorial code that realistically addresses the damaging portrayal of eating disorders, raises awareness of unrealistic visual imagery created through airbrushing and digital enhancement, and also addresses the skewed and erroneous content of magazines." Take it for what its worth. Its not the only cause, but it is a cause. quote:
They just don't care because airbrushing is NOT the problem. So why would anyone think stopping air brushing is the solution? And the bolded portion was my point...ahem. Ahem... bold away. Even you cant shake my self image. The part you are negating is the age of the market... its no longer 15 year olds, its now 5 year olds, aspiring to be the Next Top Model... which I happen to actually like because it IS a realistic look at what these women look like before the touching occurs. And, honestly, are you going to try and say these models dont suffer from eating disorders themselves? Its talked about ad nauseam. http://www.edreferral.com/Celebrities_who_died_or_have_Eating_Disorders.htm So lets leave that discussion of whether modeling, air touching photos, ect causes eating disorders.
_____________________________
Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt. RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11 Duchess of Dissent 1 Dont judge me because I sin differently than you. If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.
|