DesideriScuri
Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012 Status: offline
|
FR, So, we have a guy that is stating that he knows we had boots in Syria in December, and that he doesn't know if we have them there now. And, then, we have a guy who states that we only have around 300 soldiers reported to be near Syria. They go back and forth with one requiring proof, but not giving any proof that the other guy is wrong. Yeah, if there is going to be a claim, there should also be some proof, but, isn't it possible that there are reasons why someone can't just give proof or that there are unreported troops in Syria? And, that's not even the fucking point of the OP, FFS. What does the President do? The list of issues against Hussein is a lot longer than that against Assad, right? If Obama had an issue with going after Hussein, he can't go after toppling Assad now, can he? What happens if we find out that we've had unreported boots on the ground in Syria? What does that mean, then?
_____________________________
What I support: - A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
- Personal Responsibility
- Help for the truly needy
- Limited Government
- Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)
|