LadyAngelika
Posts: 8070
Joined: 7/4/2004 Status: offline
|
A few things struck me from your original post. Firstly, in your descriptions, you chose to focus on a lot of negative traits that a group could have rather then some positive qualities. The simple fact that you associate the traits to a bad habit such a smoking is indicative that you simply want to look at the negative side of people. Personalities are crafted in a fine balance of traits that, when out of whack, can create a negative result. Lets take generosity for example. Generosity can be a quality. However, when someone is generous to a fault, two things happen: 1) they are giving more then they should, denying their own self something they need and 2) often are resentful if they did not get the appropriate recognition for their generosity which leads to bitterness. This is only one example and there are many and they can go in many directions. That is because human personalities are very complex. I very much appreciate the potential applications of archetypes and schematics. However, we have to be careful in overgeneralisations in applying them. Secondly, as Dread pointed out, you did leave out a lot of personality types from your descriptions. That is the problem when you chose to map out archetypes and limit yourself to the obvious ones. Thirdly, as cariad pointed out, you seem to have a bias in your descriptions. Now of course this is your opinion and I’m a big believer in voicing our opinions. However, I think that we grow as people when we can deconstruct our opinions and allow for a broader perspective of the world. Your summation of “Dynamics of people types” in 500+ words does not permit you that broader perspective. In fact, it simply reduces it. If you want to read about archetypical psychology, there are interesting writings by Carl Jung, James Hillman, Thomas Moore et al. - LA
_____________________________
Une main de fer dans un gant de velours ~ An iron hand in a velvet glove
|