RE: Fakes, flakes and more at CollarMe

RE: Fakes, flakes and more at CollarMe (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid

Message

myotherself -> RE: Fakes, flakes and more at CollarMe (7/3/2013 11:44:31 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Missdressed My next tatt is going to say "Dullness is a disease" that's a Freddie quote. I'm a bit of a Queen groupie [:)][:D] I saw them live many, many years ago. What a showman Freddie was! But I digress...I believe the talk had turned to golden showers perks

Rawni -> RE: Fakes, flakes and more at CollarMe (7/3/2013 11:47:03 AM)
Don't get too excited, he was all talk. [;)]

Missdressed -> RE: Fakes, flakes and more at CollarMe (7/3/2013 12:01:09 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: myotherself quote: ORIGINAL: Missdressed My next tatt is going to say "Dullness is a disease" that's a Freddie quote. I'm a bit of a Queen groupie [:)][:D] I saw them live many, many years ago. What a showman Freddie was! But I digress...I believe the talk had turned to golden showers perks Gosh. You must be SIGNIFICANTLY older than me, because I was far far too young ever to have watched them on Live Aid and thought they stole the show. Honest. [8D]

myotherself -> RE: Fakes, flakes and more at CollarMe (7/3/2013 12:09:46 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Missdressed quote: ORIGINAL: myotherself quote: ORIGINAL: Missdressed My next tatt is going to say "Dullness is a disease" that's a Freddie quote. I'm a bit of a Queen groupie [:)][:D] I saw them live many, many years ago. What a showman Freddie was! But I digress...I believe the talk had turned to golden showers perks Gosh. You must be SIGNIFICANTLY older than me, because I was far far too young ever to have watched them on Live Aid and thought they stole the show. Honest. [8D] It was 1986. sob

Rawni -> RE: Fakes, flakes and more at CollarMe (7/3/2013 12:12:27 PM)
Man... the California Jam's never get any press! Are we all dying off or is it that you had to be there? [:D] I know some of us were in induced brain fogs... but some must remember something about those concerts. We gave Woodstock a run for it, I am tellin ya. Hehehe Though I don't remember... maybe Queen was there. Hummmm Linda Lovelace was there... I remember that. [;)]

LadyPact -> RE: Fakes, flakes and more at CollarMe (7/3/2013 12:38:41 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: wckdmnd I see all the complaints about fakes and flakes and trolls. And it seems to Me that no self respecting site (even a free one) would want a bunch of fakes. First off, the fakes are pretty easy to tell. They recycle the same pics of the same girls or guys. Or they use a porn stars pics. Or they want some amount of money to cover "training costs" It's really not rocket science to tell the fakes. But the only logical reason I can see for allowing the fakes to be here. Is the fakes are created by the powers that be of the site. To simply bolster the numbers of the site. And if you're stupid enough to fall for a fake. The joke's on you You really think the folks taking care of this site have the time to create the fake profiles? If you honestly believe that, you must think the Mods around this joint are chained to their computers 24/7 and sit there non stop on the task. I'll give you the part about the joke being on you. It is an adult site, so I'm guessing they expect people to be adults here.

wckdmnd -> RE: Fakes, flakes and more at CollarMe (7/3/2013 12:50:33 PM)
And you would know of being an adult why LadyPact .. *chuckles

stef -> RE: Fakes, flakes and more at CollarMe (7/3/2013 12:52:33 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: wckdmnd And you would know of being an adult why LadyPact .. *chuckles Is this an example of your "wckdmnd" in action? It needs work.

Just0Us0Two -> RE: Fakes, flakes and more at CollarMe (7/3/2013 12:53:02 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: OsideGirl Yeah, cuz it couldn't be because the site is staffed by volunteers, they're seriously understaffed (1 person working site support), 500 new profiles a day and they're overwhelmed. It couldn't possibly be that, it has to be a nefarious plot. What's that old quote, "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity"

LadyPact -> RE: Fakes, flakes and more at CollarMe (7/3/2013 12:53:56 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: wckdmnd And you would know of being an adult why LadyPact .. *chuckles I'm grown enough not to send money to people I don't know over the internet. Does that count?

Yachtie -> RE: Fakes, flakes and more at CollarMe (7/3/2013 1:00:50 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LadyPact ]I'm grown enough not to send money to people I don't know over the internet. Does that count? But by sending $150.00 to Nigeria you could have millions [:D]

MissKittyDeVine -> RE: Fakes, flakes and more at CollarMe (7/3/2013 1:03:43 PM)
Does anyone. Think. That this posting style. Is. Familiar.

VideoAdminRho -> RE: Fakes, flakes and more at CollarMe (7/3/2013 1:10:58 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MissKittyDeVine Does anyone. Think. That this posting style. Is. Familiar. With good reason.[;)]

jlf1961 -> RE: Fakes, flakes and more at CollarMe (7/3/2013 1:13:12 PM)
I still say that the admins should be given elite teams to track these individuals down and fill their homes floor to ceiling with tapioca pudding.

MsLadySue -> RE: Fakes, flakes and more at CollarMe (7/3/2013 1:13:31 PM)
I agree.

LadyPact -> RE: Fakes, flakes and more at CollarMe (7/3/2013 1:18:05 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MissKittyDeVine Does anyone. Think. That this posting style. Is. Familiar. You've got mail. [:)] So, if I'm reading right, the OP is a sock and therefore, a hypocrite?

ShaharThorne -> RE: Fakes, flakes and more at CollarMe (7/3/2013 1:25:29 PM)
I mentioned the socks first!!! Now, will someone send me some seamed stockings? Queen size...

OrionTheWolf -> RE: Fakes, flakes and more at CollarMe (7/3/2013 1:25:41 PM)
This is a familiar claim I have seen only two people make before anywhere, and your way of writing is very much like one of them. If you created a fake profile to post this then are you not proving yourself wrong, since you are not one of the powers that be? quote: ORIGINAL: wckdmnd I see all the complaints about fakes and flakes and trolls. And it seems to Me that no self respecting site (even a free one) would want a bunch of fakes. First off, the fakes are pretty easy to tell. They recycle the same pics of the same girls or guys. Or they use a porn stars pics. Or they want some amount of money to cover "training costs" It's really not rocket science to tell the fakes. But the only logical reason I can see for allowing the fakes to be here. Is the fakes are created by the powers that be of the site. To simply bolster the numbers of the site. And if you're stupid enough to fall for a fake. The joke's on you

wckdmnd -> RE: Fakes, flakes and more at CollarMe (7/3/2013 1:49:46 PM)
Interesting theory OrionTheWolf .. ah the plot thickens

ChatteParfaitt -> RE: Fakes, flakes and more at CollarMe (7/3/2013 2:22:42 PM)
Here is a short lesson in internet marketing, and how it applies to CM. Today's websites can easily pull up reports not just on number of users, but number of unique users. So CM's owner wouldn't have a reason to create fake accounts, which makes that particular allegation even more ludicrous. Advertisers don't pay based on number of users, they pay based on number of clicks. If your users never click on the ad that takes them to the site where they will spend money, the site won't make any advertising dollars, no matter how many users it has. I believe the number of sock accounts on CM is directly related to CM's practice of giving new accounts more coverage on the front page - it's called Newest Local Users and it's an actual tab on the left hand side. This is why new female users are inundated with messages the first few weeks -- CM makes them so easy to find. From anecdotal evidence alone, I've noticed I receive more messages when I have been gone for a few days - another reason for the scammers to have several sock accounts, they rotate them for maximum visibility. Just saying . . .

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 4 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875