Powergamz1
Posts: 1927
Joined: 9/3/2011 Status: offline
|
Florida models their rules after the FRE. A pattern of some behaviors can be admitted to suggest that it might have been repeated at the time of the incident if the totality of the circumstances were similar. It cannot be used in cases of calling a rape victim a slut, to inflame the jury, for example. This victim's past behavior, say pot smoking, grades, possible larceny, clothing, etc. is more inflammatory than probative on the question of 'did he criminally attack Zimmerman?' If there were verifiable documentation of Martin attacking Hispanic people after spewing racist invective, or engaging in 'lying in wait' crimes, etc, then the defense would probably have already sent something up protesting the exclusion of it... I'm guessing they don't have it. Perhaps it's in the stuff the prosecution is still playing footsie with (if it exists at all). quote:
ORIGINAL: Raiikun quote:
ORIGINAL: Powergamz1 Florida can say that all they want, the US Supreme Court explicitly says that the probative value has to outweigh the prejudicial impact. Which is part of the reason for the rules of evidence, to decide what is probative vs. Prejudicial. And Florida has decided that the defendant need not know of the victim's reputation for violence for it to be admissible, as it does not pertain to the defendant's fear of the victim, but the possibility that the victim was the aggressor.
_____________________________
"DOMA is unconstitutional as a deprivation of the equal liberty of persons that is protected by the Fifth Amendment" Anthony McLeod Kennedy " About damn time...wooot!!' Me
|