|
njlauren -> RE: Slate: Is S&M dangerous? Let’s look at the evidence. (7/14/2013 7:01:49 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Powergamz1
According to the author one 'proof' that BDSM isn't a sexual orientation is that a large number (52% of men not exclusively tops) of its members sometimes shift roles.
So how is being gay is a sexual orientation, when a large number of its members sometimes shift roles?
Easy, that was written by a moron who knows as much as people who believe you learn to be gay or choose it.....:). i think the doofus is confusing BD/SM with roles within it, not too bright. A switch is roughly the equivalent to someone who is bisexual, whereas someone who tops/bottoms/Dom/Sub exclusively are like heteros *shrug*. I wonder if this jackward thinks bisexuals aren't a sexual orientation either.
Though you can argue that BD/SM is entirely sexual, how about people into service D/s that never have sex? Or where they have D/s but don't do kink?
|
|
|
|
