Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

more crazy cuccinelli


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> more crazy cuccinelli Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
more crazy cuccinelli - 7/24/2013 5:20:44 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
http://metronews.ca/news/world/746636/oral-sex-ban-virginia-no-longer-for-lovers/

WASHINGTON – The gubernatorial race in Virginia is raising eyebrows across the nation thanks to the seemingly archaic views of the Republican vying for the job — in particular, Ken Cuccinelli’s desire to bring back laws that would outlaw oral and anal sex between any two people.

On the campaign trail, Cuccinelli, the state’s attorney general, has been defending the state’s so-called Crimes Against Nature laws, struck down earlier this year by a federal court. The laws banned what it called “sodomy” — including anal and oral sex between any two consenting adults, married or unmarried, gay or straight.

Cuccinelli, who unveiled a website this week that called for the laws to be resurrected, insists they were meant to protect children from sexual predators. In a tight race for the governor’s mansion against Democrat Terry McAuliffe, Cuccinelli also says his support of Crimes Against Nature isn’t aimed at consenting adults.
http://www.vachildpredators.com/
The text of the statute, however, states that any person who “carnally knows any male or female person by the anus or by or with the mouth, or voluntarily submits to such carnal knowledge, he or she shall be guilty of a Class 6 felony.”

http://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/republican-candidate-wants-to-revise-laws-ban-oral-sex-1.1380291


Now Id love to actually love to see the wording that changes the statute, but ...seriously, the law was banned by the courts, ....maybe a new law for minors????
His position was VERY clear in the debate between him and McCauliffe the other day.
Crazy bastard really really believes in smaller government eh?


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: more crazy cuccinelli - 7/24/2013 6:34:55 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
http://metronews.ca/news/world/746636/oral-sex-ban-virginia-no-longer-for-lovers/
WASHINGTON – The gubernatorial race in Virginia is raising eyebrows across the nation thanks to the seemingly archaic views of the Republican vying for the job — in particular, Ken Cuccinelli’s desire to bring back laws that would outlaw oral and anal sex between any two people.
On the campaign trail, Cuccinelli, the state’s attorney general, has been defending the state’s so-called Crimes Against Nature laws, struck down earlier this year by a federal court. The laws banned what it called “sodomy” — including anal and oral sex between any two consenting adults, married or unmarried, gay or straight.
Cuccinelli, who unveiled a website this week that called for the laws to be resurrected, insists they were meant to protect children from sexual predators. In a tight race for the governor’s mansion against Democrat Terry McAuliffe, Cuccinelli also says his support of Crimes Against Nature isn’t aimed at consenting adults.
http://www.vachildpredators.com/
The text of the statute, however, states that any person who “carnally knows any male or female person by the anus or by or with the mouth, or voluntarily submits to such carnal knowledge, he or she shall be guilty of a Class 6 felony.”
http://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/republican-candidate-wants-to-revise-laws-ban-oral-sex-1.1380291
Now Id love to actually love to see the wording that changes the statute, but ...seriously, the law was banned by the courts, ....maybe a new law for minors????
His position was VERY clear in the debate between him and McCauliffe the other day.
Crazy bastard really really believes in smaller government eh?


Oh, come on, now. Just because it doesn't say anything about the age(s) of the participants doesn't mean it's not just about protecting the kiddies. He said it isn't aimed at consenting adults. That has to be good enough, doesn't it? I mean, we get that from our National politicians all the time and they sometimes stick to that...


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: more crazy cuccinelli - 7/24/2013 6:36:51 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
where?

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 3
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> more crazy cuccinelli Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078