UnicornGoddess -> RE: Attraction to Disfigurement (8/1/2013 12:17:59 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DesFIP The problem with this is what it always is. Nobody wants to be viewed as a fantasy for you. They want you to pick them for what makes them an individual. If you're saying that you wouldn't give him a second glance without the scar, then that's not attractive. You're quite right about no one wanting to be seen purely as a fantasy/sex object. I would argue that by new-found interest in scars is no different, in that way, from someone who has a preference for large breasts, long toes or blonde hair. I don't need someone to be disfigured to be attracted to them (my fiance is not disfigured) nor, when I meet someone who is disfigured, do I treat them like some sort of sex object. quote:
ORIGINAL: evesgrden Does he still have to pay if he has a scar or can he get it for free? I'm not sure I understnad your question. If your asking if a disfigured person I found attractive would still have to pay for my Findom services...well then, yes, of course. That's what makes it "Financial" domination. It's about an exchange of money, which is sexy to me. If you're asking if a disfigured person I found attractive would have to pay to have sex with me, then no, because I don't offer this as a service. I don't have a moral issue with exchanging sex for money, it's just that it doesn't interest me personally. The fact that I joined this site predominately because of my Findom activities does not preclude the fact that I am a human being with other interests. Some of my other interests, like his, are kinky and so this seemed to be an appropriate place to talk them. If your question was anything other than a joke and if I haven't addressed it properly here, feel free to message me privately.
|
|
|
|