Termyn8or
Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
So I want to hear how YOU THINK you can change anything the legislatures in this country has done.
I read where a poll of registered voters had 29.4 % of the respondents replied that they believed that an armed revolution might be necessary in this country "in a few years". I don't put much weight in these things but consider that these were not uber-radical separatists living in the mountains somewhere, there were registered voters. To go through the process of registering to vote, which CAN be used against you in certain cases, one would assume that these people still had some faith in the system, but of course had their doubts.
Couple that number with the joke going arouind that North korea has a higher approval rating than congress now, and the situation does look bleak. There are a nuber of poster on this board and FL who are with the system 100 %, who believe in it and would actually fight for it, even in the face of up over half of the people in this country being against it. Much of the US military is on psyche drugs now and I happen to know something of what they do. I had a friend until he got on them. He is now aloof, and in a position to release things from his employment, like ebola for example. This is not good. People get on these drugs and they are no longer grounded in reality, so thinking that the military would support the people in a real confrontation is a shot in the dark at best. If the top brass who issues the orders were to go against the government as they have in other countries we would have a real chance, but the system treats them so well the only hope is for them to grow a real conscience. Fat chance in that kind of fertilizer.
The fact is that nobody in either of the two entrenched parties is trustable or will act in the People's interest, give it up. Forget it. Then we have the problem of the sheeple who will not vote for a third party candidate because that would take a vote away from one of the normal lesser of two evils.
In short, there are no short term solutions. I've considered many. In younger days I considered a new million Man march, one which would include all races and just march on Washington with a list of demands. there are some who want to do that armed, but that shouldn't be necessary. Guns are for picking them off from the rooftops and shit, the People will never win an armed confrontation. the only hope there is to make it practically impossible to go about day to day governance. Cause it to be impossible to evict or forclose, even to shut off utilities, to satisfy warrants and such. To this day many people find it hard to believe that there are places that cops dare not go, but I can not only prove it, I can take you there in this city. This is not the same as the argument with Ken here, there ARE such places in this town and guess what. In many cases the cops WILL go there, but only off duty.
There are some non-violent options at this point, well not completely non-violent. One would be to get our own peole into governemt at the federal level. this would take alot of time and many of them would have to be sleepers. You can't send one Man into that den of vipers because he would at best be marginalized like Ron Paul or Dennis Kucinich, or out and out framed like Trafficant. They WILL get rid of the squeaky wheel. And don't start about Trafficant, I KNOW he was framed, period. And I know why.
So we get these people, in the space of about six years, who will vote as a block and do pretty much what Ron Paul did, vote against anything unconstitutional, but also leave abortion the fuck alone. As good as he would have been for this country, he made a BAD mistake poisoning himself on the abortion issue. See, everything the democrats stand for turns my fucking stomach, but I believe there should be abortomats on every corner, with the defaul option of a tubal ligation sort of like a hot wax at the car wash. If you can't stop fucking, be killing. Sound silly ? How many crack babies have YOU adopted ? The point is that almost any candidate for anything has one fatal flaw, people have to realize that they are not electing a dictator. At least not to congress.
Another option is a nationwide strike. The problem with that is jobs are so hard to come by, people are too replaceable. Even me. People say that losing one day's revenue wwould hurt "them" immensely but that is not true. It might hurt the government but not the leeches who have occupied it. See all of them are set for life and this is just a power game that feeds their addiction. Once you understand that as one of their prime motives you understand why they do what they do, and then they are quite predictable. Starve them, no more cars and TVs and shit like that. Live ike a hundred years ago. Conserve everytghing and avoid supporting the "economy". When money moves they take some of it, like a bird or other species' that have eyes that react to movement. Think of them as that type of predator and be stil. Or keep your money still. Don't keep it in the banks, in fact DO spend it. On fuel, generators, food, tools (which includes kiling tools). Starve the beast.
One other option is the states' rights angle. this would not be all that easy, but which option is anyway ? Seriously, you know that all fifty states have put in for secession. Of course those measures were symbolic but think abou it. With the ambiguities concerning tax laws, let states opt out and just take the fed protion of the taxes and become independent. Let the militias of said states defend agianst the feds. They would be standing between the federal JBTs and their elected representatives. this plan's chances of success are tha tit is easier to elect on a state level. In fact that's why the Constitution had state legislators electing senators, not the general populace. this also assured some attention to states' rights, which was the intent. The federal government reall y wasn't supposed to be much more than what the EU was sold as. Ask Europeans NOW, many of them are sorry they got into that mess. It weas sold as a trade agreement but what trade agreement has a 700 page constitution and tries to manipulate the laws of member states ?
See the parallel ? So if People woulld actully get serious about supporting states' rights, the federal government could become marginalized to the point where, well, it would be in line ith what it was intended to be.
Does any of this sound appealing to you ? Does any of it sound easy ? No, it is neither. It took a long hard time to make this fucking mess and it is not going to get cleaned up anytime soon.
More some other time.
T^T
(Not edited to add that I need to post it to edit it because the font ois bigger and I can see the MF. Would you believe that I can still shoot pretty straight ? If I find too many errors I will edit)
|
Any wonder why militias are forming in the US? - 
Profile
.gif){kind=avatar}
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread