OedipusRexIt
Posts: 634
Joined: 11/15/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: ModeratorEleven quote:
ORIGINAL: OedipusRexIt I'd like to support the OP (hurray, Sir K, for stating a needed truth) and respectfully disagree with the moderator's post. The dumping of links interferes with the flow of the discussion. While it is indeed true that one does not have to read it, some do, and respond in a way that often renders the thread useless from that point forward. It adds nothing to the discussion, and detracts much. The same could be said for the endless banter and snarky comments that get injected into threads on a daily basis. Where would you have us draw the line? quote:
Even if it might not do so, I don't think a facile dismissal of the concept is warranted. There was no facile dismissal, you're just not privy to the discussions between the site admins. As I said, there is no compelling reason to change our policy on this matter at the present time. Should such reasons arise, we'll be happy to reevaluate the matter when that occurs. "I don't like it" or "they didn't allow it on another website I used to frequent" aren't quite enough to compel us to reconsider the current policy. XI I think I was being quite clear where the line should be drawn, and the comparison you make is weak, at best. Links are links, an objecitvely verifiable thing, unlike a subjective opinion of what constitutes facile, or snarky for that matter. I'm not the least bit interested in the private discussions of moderators and can't imagine why that's relevant, especially since it does nothing to enhance or support your pronouncements. I am also not the least bit suprised at how you treated a useful suggestion. Thanks for not disappointing.
_____________________________
"My name is Inigo Montoya, you killed my father, prepare to die..."
|