Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

So if cold blooded murder were "legal" would they do it?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> So if cold blooded murder were "legal" would they do it? Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
So if cold blooded murder were "legal" would ... - 8/25/2013 3:59:17 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
Listen to this guy, 2 am, over a 15day old late fee (I guess), rampage and terrorize the house of black people. Kicking them and standing on their head? serving civil warrant at 2 am? WTF?

Does anyone doubt that if murder was legal the police would start slaughtering people. Because its "leego"?

News clip:
http://www.wsbtv.com/news/news/local/dekalb-deputies-under-fire-video-arrest/nZHgY/

debtors prisons coming back soon!





_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: So if cold blooded murder were "legal" wo... - 8/25/2013 5:25:15 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
Listen to this guy, 2 am, over a 15day old late fee (I guess), rampage and terrorize the house of black people. Kicking them and standing on their head? serving civil warrant at 2 am? WTF?
Does anyone doubt that if murder was legal the police would start slaughtering people. Because its "leego"?
News clip:
http://www.wsbtv.com/news/news/local/dekalb-deputies-under-fire-video-arrest/nZHgY/
debtors prisons coming back soon!


Wow. I hope this investigation finds the truth behind this incident, and that all appropriate responses are meted out.

Damn.


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: So if cold blooded murder were "legal" wo... - 8/26/2013 6:53:11 AM   
Zonie63


Posts: 2826
Joined: 4/25/2011
From: The Old Pueblo
Status: offline
I looked at a few different articles about this, but none of them said what she owed the $1000 fine for (which was 15 days overdue).

Why didn't they just send her a bill?

And even if their policy is to send officers out to collect fees (which is a rather curious practice to say the least), why do it at 1:30am? Who thought that one up? Did they just hear about it only that night, in the middle of the night? The article didn't really say that either.

Why don't these reporters ever give us these stories in their entirety? Why don't they ever ask the right questions? Why do they leave their readers with more questions than answers? I can understand that the cops may be stonewalling and they may be getting a lot of "no comments," but at least say that they tried, that they at least thought of asking the question and made an effort to get an answer. But nowadays, they don't even bother doing that.

The lady who was arrested asked the question, which the reporter mentioned in the article: "Fifteen (days) overdue, why would you come to my house with this unbelievable show of force?" Griffin said. Too bad the reporter didn't ask that question when the Sheriff's Office Chief Deputy had that press conference. Then we might have gotten an answer and had a little more information about this case.

Is this common practice, to send small squads of officers to collect overdue fines? Who knows? Certainly the reporter doesn't know and didn't think to ask. Too much missing information in newspaper stories just bugs me to no end.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: So if cold blooded murder were "legal" wo... - 8/26/2013 7:02:25 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63
I looked at a few different articles about this, but none of them said what she owed the $1000 fine for (which was 15 days overdue).
Why didn't they just send her a bill?
And even if their policy is to send officers out to collect fees (which is a rather curious practice to say the least), why do it at 1:30am? Who thought that one up? Did they just hear about it only that night, in the middle of the night? The article didn't really say that either.
Why don't these reporters ever give us these stories in their entirety? Why don't they ever ask the right questions? Why do they leave their readers with more questions than answers? I can understand that the cops may be stonewalling and they may be getting a lot of "no comments," but at least say that they tried, that they at least thought of asking the question and made an effort to get an answer. But nowadays, they don't even bother doing that.
The lady who was arrested asked the question, which the reporter mentioned in the article: "Fifteen (days) overdue, why would you come to my house with this unbelievable show of force?" Griffin said. Too bad the reporter didn't ask that question when the Sheriff's Office Chief Deputy had that press conference. Then we might have gotten an answer and had a little more information about this case.
Is this common practice, to send small squads of officers to collect overdue fines? Who knows? Certainly the reporter doesn't know and didn't think to ask. Too much missing information in newspaper stories just bugs me to no end.


I'm sure they already sent a bill.

I'm surprised there wasn't simply a bench warrant out, and that was as far as it went. I also wonder if it's more than 15 days (not that a small group of officers seems financially prudent to send for a $1000 fine to begin with).


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Zonie63)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: So if cold blooded murder were "legal" wo... - 8/26/2013 1:26:20 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63
I looked at a few different articles about this, but none of them said what she owed the $1000 fine for (which was 15 days overdue).
Why didn't they just send her a bill?
And even if their policy is to send officers out to collect fees (which is a rather curious practice to say the least), why do it at 1:30am? Who thought that one up? Did they just hear about it only that night, in the middle of the night? The article didn't really say that either.
Why don't these reporters ever give us these stories in their entirety? Why don't they ever ask the right questions? Why do they leave their readers with more questions than answers? I can understand that the cops may be stonewalling and they may be getting a lot of "no comments," but at least say that they tried, that they at least thought of asking the question and made an effort to get an answer. But nowadays, they don't even bother doing that.
The lady who was arrested asked the question, which the reporter mentioned in the article: "Fifteen (days) overdue, why would you come to my house with this unbelievable show of force?" Griffin said. Too bad the reporter didn't ask that question when the Sheriff's Office Chief Deputy had that press conference. Then we might have gotten an answer and had a little more information about this case.
Is this common practice, to send small squads of officers to collect overdue fines? Who knows? Certainly the reporter doesn't know and didn't think to ask. Too much missing information in newspaper stories just bugs me to no end.


I'm sure they already sent a bill.

I'm surprised there wasn't simply a bench warrant out, and that was as far as it went. I also wonder if it's more than 15 days (not that a small group of officers seems financially prudent to send for a $1000 fine to begin with).


It is my experience that it is often x number of dollars or x number of days.
The time she had before going to jail would have been explained at sentencing.
1:30 A M does not make sense.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: So if cold blooded murder were "legal" wo... - 8/26/2013 2:55:46 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

Listen to this guy, 2 am, over a 15day old late fee (I guess), rampage and terrorize the house of black people. Kicking them and standing on their head? serving civil warrant at 2 am? WTF?

Does anyone doubt that if murder was legal the police would start slaughtering people. Because its "leego"?

News clip:
http://www.wsbtv.com/news/news/local/dekalb-deputies-under-fire-video-arrest/nZHgY/

debtors prisons coming back soon!





Lots of people, from all walks of life, would.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 6
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> So if cold blooded murder were "legal" would they do it? Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078