RE: For shame... (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message

DesideriScuri -> RE: For shame... (8/29/2013 7:31:25 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
Why? He said the voting shows it, it does not. You know what monolithic means.


I look forward to your application of the same standard when you accuse a group that is made up of many sub-groups/factions of anything. I'm also looking forward to your demanding that same standard of anyone making similar generalities.

You don't have to get defensive about it, MN. I'm just looking forward to consistency, as should you.



mnottertail -> RE: For shame... (8/29/2013 7:39:02 AM)

I am not defensive, as everyone else, I am pushing my point of view, it neither has to be consistent, nor anything else.

I will do what I do, and most of you all will do what you want to do, I shouldn't do shit.

There are rarely any sort of credible citations that come from the opposite side of the aisle (although that is a little incorrect in my case, since it wouldn't really be my opposite side, just is in the current configuration, since I am not a democrat by any stretch but they are a little more centrist than the yodelers on the right nowadays)




DesideriScuri -> RE: For shame... (8/29/2013 7:47:13 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
I am not defensive, as everyone else, I am pushing my point of view, it neither has to be consistent, nor anything else.
I will do what I do, and most of you all will do what you want to do, I shouldn't do shit.
There are rarely any sort of credible citations that come from the opposite side of the aisle (although that is a little incorrect in my case, since it wouldn't really be my opposite side, just is in the current configuration, since I am not a democrat by any stretch but they are a little more centrist than the yodelers on the right nowadays)


"Credible citations"

"... I want 100% something for some reason."

You want the opportunity to be inconsistent. I'm sure application won't have anything to do with your ideology. [8|]




mnottertail -> RE: For shame... (8/29/2013 7:58:26 AM)

and yours.



VideoAdminChi -> RE: For shame... (8/29/2013 8:11:55 AM)

Alrighty then, reminder to discuss POSTS not POSTERS.



DesideriScuri -> RE: For shame... (8/29/2013 8:20:58 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
and yours.


Feel free (not that I doubted you wouldn't without my blessing (dammit, this just got religious [:D])) to call me out on that.



DesideriScuri -> RE: For shame... (8/29/2013 8:22:12 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: VideoAdminChi
Alrighty then, reminder to discuss POSTS not POSTERS.


Sorry. Posted while you posted this.



mnottertail -> RE: For shame... (8/29/2013 8:22:16 AM)

I do constantly, so, along with the OP and the intervening spinners, was this thread a fuckin dud or what?

I vote useless dud.



DesideriScuri -> RE: For shame... (8/29/2013 8:24:51 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
I do constantly, so, along with the OP and the intervening spinners, was this thread a fuckin dud or what?
I vote useless dud.


Constantly? Hardly.

Yes, a complete dud.

29 posts (including this one) and 10 of them are us discussing consistency (and getting a gentle reminder from Chi).



Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125