Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Anti-lads’ mags – and anti-people


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Anti-lads’ mags – and anti-people Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Anti-lads’ mags – and anti-people - 8/29/2013 5:30:03 PM   
naughtynick81


Posts: 890
Joined: 3/23/2007
Status: offline 		http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite/article/antilads_mags_and_anti_people/13955#.Uh_mez9cVEw

Now let's see the people criticising these feminists and citing violence against men and male objectification in media outlets to downplay their complaints and indicate they are whiny and pathetic.

Ya know, treat these feminists the same as how I am treated in the other thread.

Can't wait to laugh at the double standards.
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Anti-lads’ mags – and anti-people - 8/29/2013 5:33:24 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline 		Nick, you`re a one trick pony.

In ranting about everything, you lose any sympathy for anything.

(in reply to naughtynick81)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Anti-lads’ mags – and anti-people - 8/29/2013 5:37:44 PM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline 		You're equating objectifying people with shooting them, then?

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to naughtynick81)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Anti-lads’ mags – and anti-people - 8/29/2013 5:40:50 PM   
naughtynick81


Posts: 890
Joined: 3/23/2007
Status: offline
quote:

You're equating objectifying people with shooting them, then?


Firstly, what's worse? So shouldn't the worse problem be more validated to complain about than the lesser problem? In my books, it's worse to shoot someone's genitals than it is to objectify.

Secondly, objectifying is not their only complaint towards lad mags.

quote:

protesters talk about the ‘harm’ caused by these magazines. ‘There is a growing body of research that shows a link between sexual images, patriarchal attitudes and violence against women



(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Anti-lads’ mags – and anti-people - 8/29/2013 5:42:31 PM   
Apocalypso


Posts: 1104
Joined: 4/20/2009
Status: offline 		I'm outraged by the fact they make claims about what lad's mags say and yet can't name any of the lad's mags.

Also, I don't like it when they make grandiose "I'm done" statements and then start threads on the same thing. It makes them look like they're either stupid or dishonest.

< Message edited by Apocalypso -- 8/29/2013 5:43:56 PM >

_____________________________

If you're going to quote from the Book of Revelation,
Don't keep calling it the "Book of Revelations",
There's no "s", it's the Book of Revelation,
As revealed to Saint John the Divine.

(in reply to naughtynick81)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Anti-lads’ mags – and anti-people - 8/29/2013 5:43:57 PM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: naughtynick81
In my books, it's worse to shoot someone's genitals than it is to objectify.

So why were you equating the two?

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to naughtynick81)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Anti-lads’ mags – and anti-people - 8/29/2013 5:45:33 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline 		Didnt Maxim recently drop in numbers? Seems to me the internet is affecting the lad mags.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Apocalypso)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Anti-lads’ mags – and anti-people - 8/29/2013 5:53:21 PM   
naughtynick81


Posts: 890
Joined: 3/23/2007
Status: offline
quote:

So why were you equating the two?


I never did. I am equating if one gender is allowed to complain, that means the other is also. It's not my fault that you hold a heavy favouritism towards women.

quote:

Also, I don't like it when they make grandiose "I'm done" statements and then start threads on the same thing. It makes them look like they're either stupid or dishonest.


"I'm done" in a thread with people who keep skirting around the crux of the matter.

It's not being stupid or dishonest to stop responding to people who keep making diversions around the actual point of the topic. I created this thread to see the difference of the attitudes of the posters here with this one compared to the other situation in the other thread.

What I define as stupidity and dishonesty is when people have one standard for feminists with this matter and another standard for a male complaining about the other matter.




(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Anti-lads’ mags – and anti-people - 8/29/2013 5:54:20 PM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Didnt Maxim recently drop in numbers? Seems to me the internet is affecting the lad mags.

Either that or the fact that Maxim is a PC version of Loaded, which means it's always been at a bit of a disadvantage. Trying to look "classy" when the competition is plunging lairily downmarket isn't going to do you any favours, is it?
It's a bit like Windows 8: trying to do two things at once and being crap at both of them.
(Free porn online is probably going to hurt the sales of a magazine that's just there for lads who are too wussy to buy proper smut magazines, if we're honest.)

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Anti-lads’ mags – and anti-people - 8/29/2013 5:55:05 PM   
MsMJAY


Posts: 515
Joined: 3/17/2013
Status: offline 		I was going to say "well shoot, its just a magazine," but instead of bitching about it, these women organized, started a movement, raised funds, actively involved themselves in creating change and obtained legal counsel to defend their apparent "rights."

By comparison....you posted a rant about it on a BDSM social networking site.

I can't understand why you are not being taken as seriously as they are.

(in reply to naughtynick81)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Anti-lads’ mags – and anti-people - 8/29/2013 5:56:00 PM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: naughtynick81
"I'm done" in a thread with people who keep skirting around the crux of the matter.

Well maybe you shouldn't have spent a whole thread doing that yourself, then?

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to naughtynick81)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Anti-lads’ mags – and anti-people - 8/29/2013 6:03:05 PM   
naughtynick81


Posts: 890
Joined: 3/23/2007
Status: offline
quote:

but instead of bitching about it, these women organized, started a movement, raised funds, actively involved themselves in creating change and obtained legal counsel to defend their apparent "rights."


Ummm isn't that exactly BITCHING?

I thought the biggest stink you make about a petty issue, the worse it makes one look. The more whiny it makes one look. The more pathetic it makes one look.

quote:

By comparison....you posted a rant about it on a BDSM social networking site.

I can't understand why you are not being taken as seriously as they are.


So any rant about any other issue in the world on this forum. Such as rants about the Zimmerman case, gun laws, Obama, Republicans, etc etc etc. We see these types of topics repeatedly all the time in forums.

So if they just rant about their opinions about these issues on a forum and aren't actually doing anything to change it, does the same standard apply to them? Or is there only an isolated standard when its a man complaining about male issues?

Can you see why I don;t take such diversion tactics seriously when the same standard doesn't apply for people complaining about anything else in the world?


(in reply to MsMJAY)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Anti-lads’ mags – and anti-people - 8/29/2013 6:06:57 PM   
Apocalypso


Posts: 1104
Joined: 4/20/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: naughtynick81
So if they just rant about their opinions about these issues on a forum and aren't actually doing anything to change it, does the same standard apply to them? Or is there only an isolated standard when its a man complaining about male issues?

As I've repeatedly pointed out to you, it's not about you being a man. It's about the fact that very few people like you, as an individual. That's not a double standard.

_____________________________

If you're going to quote from the Book of Revelation,
Don't keep calling it the "Book of Revelations",
There's no "s", it's the Book of Revelation,
As revealed to Saint John the Divine.

(in reply to naughtynick81)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Anti-lads’ mags – and anti-people - 8/29/2013 6:07:45 PM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline 		Speaking of diversionary tactics and double standards, have you managed to think of an all female band as ugly as Napalm Death who had anything resembling a career yet?

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to naughtynick81)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Anti-lads’ mags – and anti-people - 8/29/2013 6:09:18 PM   
naughtynick81


Posts: 890
Joined: 3/23/2007
Status: offline
quote:

As I've repeatedly pointed out to you, it's not about you being a man. It's about the fact that very few people like you, as an individual. That's not a double standard.


Look up the meaning of double standard. It is a double standard when you have one standard for one person or group and another standard for any other person or group. That equals 2 standards, not one.

(in reply to Apocalypso)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Anti-lads’ mags – and anti-people - 8/29/2013 6:14:41 PM   
Apocalypso


Posts: 1104
Joined: 4/20/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: naughtynick81
Look up the meaning of double standard. It is a double standard when you have one standard for one person or group and another standard for any other person or group. That equals 2 standards, not one.

No. Because a woman who came across like you did online would be treated the same way.

If a woman came on here and constantly whined about how the evil menz were holding here down she'd be mocked. Especially if she made every thread about that. Especially if she lied about her sources.

_____________________________

If you're going to quote from the Book of Revelation,
Don't keep calling it the "Book of Revelations",
There's no "s", it's the Book of Revelation,
As revealed to Saint John the Divine.

(in reply to naughtynick81)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: Anti-lads’ mags – and anti-people - 8/29/2013 6:17:09 PM   
naughtynick81


Posts: 890
Joined: 3/23/2007
Status: offline
quote:

If a woman came on here and constantly whined about how the evil menz were holding here down she'd be mocked.


Where do I actually make the claim that evil women are holding me down?

Seems like someone here is lying, it's definitely not me.

(in reply to Apocalypso)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: Anti-lads’ mags – and anti-people - 8/29/2013 6:17:25 PM   
kalikshama


Posts: 14805
Joined: 8/8/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MsMJAY

I was going to say "well shoot, its just a magazine," but instead of bitching about it, these women organized, started a movement, raised funds, actively involved themselves in creating change and obtained legal counsel to defend their apparent "rights."

By comparison....you posted a rant about it on a BDSM social networking site.

I can't understand why you are not being taken as seriously as they are.



(in reply to MsMJAY)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: Anti-lads’ mags – and anti-people - 8/29/2013 6:19:37 PM   
naughtynick81


Posts: 890
Joined: 3/23/2007
Status: offline 		Apocalypso, are you friends with any feminists?

(in reply to kalikshama)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: Anti-lads’ mags – and anti-people - 8/29/2013 6:20:02 PM   
Apocalypso


Posts: 1104
Joined: 4/20/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: naughtynick81
Where do I actually make the claim that evil women are holding me down?


Every thread is about the mean feminists Nick. Not just here. On Fetlife as well. And, I assume, everywhere else you post. It's obvious that you're obsessed with this issue. And it's easier then recognising that the one constant in the hostile response you get everywhere is you.


quote:

Seems like someone here is lying, it's definitely not me.

Check the other thread. It has now been pointed out that you couldn't have seen the video in question on television a few days ago, because it hadn't been released.

You are a proven liar now. As such, I feel no obligation to take anything you say as factual, unless you provide citations.

_____________________________

If you're going to quote from the Book of Revelation,
Don't keep calling it the "Book of Revelations",
There's no "s", it's the Book of Revelation,
As revealed to Saint John the Divine.

(in reply to naughtynick81)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Anti-lads’ mags – and anti-people Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.107