Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: BJ ban?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: BJ ban? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: BJ ban? - 9/3/2013 7:00:37 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

I need to get moving this morning, and don't have time to go Googling. Would that have been around the time John Edwards was having his corruption trial?

After all, a state AG is far more important in defining a political party than a vice-Presidential nominee...

Gotta run. Ya'll have a lovely day!


Bingo, Rich!

quote:

ORIGINAL

On June 3, 2011, Edwards was indicted by a North Carolina grand jury on six felony charges of violating multiple federal campaign contribution laws to cover up an extramarital affair to which he admitted following his 2008 campaign. Edwards's trial began on April 23, 2012, and had he been convicted, he would have faced up to 30 years in prison and a $1.5 million fine.[2] On May 31, 2012, Edwards was found not guilty on one count, and the judge declared a mistrial on the remaining five charges, as the jury was unable to come to an agreement.[3] On June 13, 2012, the Justice Department announced that it dropped the charges and will not attempt to retry Edwards.[4]









ahem...that was 2012, not this year....which is the date in question

< Message edited by Lucylastic -- 9/3/2013 7:01:52 AM >

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: BJ ban? - 9/3/2013 7:02:36 AM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

I need to get moving this morning, and don't have time to go Googling. Would that have been around the time John Edwards was having his corruption trial?

After all, a state AG is far more important in defining a political party than a vice-Presidential nominee...

Gotta run. Ya'll have a lovely day!


Bingo, Rich!

quote:

ORIGINAL

On June 3, 2011, Edwards was indicted by a North Carolina grand jury on six felony charges of violating multiple federal campaign contribution laws to cover up an extramarital affair to which he admitted following his 2008 campaign. Edwards's trial began on April 23, 2012, and had he been convicted, he would have faced up to 30 years in prison and a $1.5 million fine.[2] On May 31, 2012, Edwards was found not guilty on one count, and the judge declared a mistrial on the remaining five charges, as the jury was unable to come to an agreement.[3] On June 13, 2012, the Justice Department announced that it dropped the charges and will not attempt to retry Edwards.[4]





May 31 2012 is not late June or late July which is when the ladies linked above posted on the subject. Someone is simply making shit up to try and deflect attention from a guy who is considered an up and comer in the Republican party but is also a prude and wannabe sex cop.

< Message edited by DomKen -- 9/3/2013 7:03:43 AM >

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: BJ ban? - 9/3/2013 7:02:42 AM   
Hillwilliam


Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

And another meaningless fundy is going to be made famous.

These stories about nobody Republicans often seem to "break" right around the time a somebody Democrat gets convicted or goes off to prison on corruption charges. Will Jesse Jackson Jr. be arriving at his new home this week?

Tazzy posted about it back in june
http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=4479929
I posted this back in july
http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=4505672



I need to get moving this morning, and don't have time to go Googling. Would that have been around the time John Edwards was having his corruption trial?


Only about a year off.

_____________________________

Kinkier than a cheap garden hose.

Whoever said "Religion is the opiate of the masses" never heard Right Wing talk radio.

Don't blame me, I voted for Gary Johnson.

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: BJ ban? - 9/3/2013 7:40:57 AM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

And another meaningless fundy is going to be made famous.

These stories about nobody Republicans often seem to "break" right around the time a somebody Democrat gets convicted or goes off to prison on corruption charges. Will Jesse Jackson Jr. be arriving at his new home this week?



This isn't the first time this guy has been brought up. Do you honestly think that once someone on the left has heard of a republican doing something stupid they are only going to comment on it once? They will continue to start threads on it to prove how superior they are to the right. Kinda childish but it seems to be all they have.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: BJ ban? - 9/3/2013 7:53:01 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi


This isn't the first time this guy has been brought up. Do you honestly think that once someone on the left has heard of a republican doing something stupid they are only going to comment on it once? They will continue to start threads on it to prove how superior they are to the right. Kinda childish but it seems to be all they have.




Seeing as he has put forward some very ridiculous ideas, regarding womens healthcare, personhood, zero abortion even under rape and incest, that we arent going to mention it?
yea dream on, for whatever reason you think we post his dumbassery
I take responsibility ONLY for MY posts and you are damn sure while this jerk is doin what he is doing, I would post about it. dem or repub.
If it was one issue, hes a twat, with all his issues, hes made for mentioning more than once.




_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: BJ ban? - 9/3/2013 7:55:39 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

This isn't the first time this guy has been brought up. Do you honestly think that once someone on the left has heard of a republican doing something stupid they are only going to comment on it once? They will continue to start threads on it to prove how superior they are to the right. Kinda childish but it seems to be all they have.


Care to wager on how often BOTH sides do that? Or are you simply talking out of the republican side of your mouth today?

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: BJ ban? - 9/3/2013 7:59:12 AM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

This isn't the first time this guy has been brought up. Do you honestly think that once someone on the left has heard of a republican doing something stupid they are only going to comment on it once? They will continue to start threads on it to prove how superior they are to the right. Kinda childish but it seems to be all they have.


Care to wager on how often BOTH sides do that? Or are you simply talking out of the republican side of your mouth today?



Of course both sides do it. Duh

but this thread isn't about the other side today, it's about this guy.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: BJ ban? - 9/3/2013 8:08:37 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline 		And your post was not about just this guy. The swipes are becoming more childish than the topics themselves.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: BJ ban? - 9/3/2013 6:05:45 PM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

And your post was not about just this guy. The swipes are becoming more childish than the topics themselves.



Not the first time you have called me childish, but if it really bothers you please feel free to use the hide button.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: BJ ban? - 9/3/2013 6:53:49 PM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

Only about a year off.



From the indictment, yes, but the trial was in 2012. Verdict came back end of May, and DOJ announced they wouldn't retry on the 5 mistrail counts in mid-June. That was right there in the same snip Michael provided, but libs only read far enough to find the first rock to throw it seems.

If I ever wind up kicking it for a while on disability, it would be a fun little research project to draw some timelines of nobody Republican "scandals" that suck up a lot of air, right alongside little tidbits like a Democrat in the US House of Representatives being allowed to quietly resign over the rape of a teenage girl (Oh. Sorry. My bad. A misunderstood sexual encounter, and nineteen isn't actually a teen).

Really, the top of the chart currently goes to a state assembly Republican getting national coverage after being cited and released for pot and speeding, when yet another Democrat from the US House of Representatives, already resigned in disgrace, was convicted of using his campaign funds as personal piggybank.

_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.


(in reply to Hillwilliam)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: BJ ban? - 9/3/2013 7:19:49 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

Only about a year off.



From the indictment, yes, but the trial was in 2012. Verdict came back end of May, and DOJ announced they wouldn't retry on the 5 mistrail counts in mid-June. That was right there in the same snip Michael provided, but libs only read far enough to find the first rock to throw it seems.

If I ever wind up kicking it for a while on disability, it would be a fun little research project to draw some timelines of nobody Republican "scandals" that suck up a lot of air, right alongside little tidbits like a Democrat in the US House of Representatives being allowed to quietly resign over the rape of a teenage girl (Oh. Sorry. My bad. A misunderstood sexual encounter, and nineteen isn't actually a teen).

Really, the top of the chart currently goes to a state assembly Republican getting national coverage after being cited and released for pot and speeding, when yet another Democrat from the US House of Representatives, already resigned in disgrace, was convicted of using his campaign funds as personal piggybank.

On June 13, 2012, the Justice Department announced that it dropped the charges and will not attempt to retry Edwards.[4]
Not 2013, and cucch was this year..not last. Last year was the mcdonnel with the rapey ultrasound bills, ...
And if you had found any more on Wu you would have been screaming at the top of your lungs.... and still ignoring all the womens health /sexuality/adultery/etc issues.

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: BJ ban? - 9/3/2013 7:35:19 PM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline 		Seriously, Lucy, did you just minimize a rape of a teenager as insufficient to care about, and in the very next sentence accuse me of ignoring women's issues?


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
And if you had found any more on Wu you would have been screaming at the top of your lungs.... and still ignoring all the womens health /sexuality/adultery/etc issues.



Yes. Yes you did.

Some people shouldn't get too passionate about their partisan cheerleading. It fucks up their souls.

Maybe I'm not the only one who badly needs a vacation.

_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.


(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: BJ ban? - 9/3/2013 8:26:31 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline 		And that is Rich trying to change the subject after getting caught repeatedly just making shit up.

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: BJ ban? - 9/3/2013 8:31:07 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

Seriously, Lucy, did you just minimize a rape of a teenager as insufficient to care about, and in the very next sentence accuse me of ignoring women's issues?


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
And if you had found any more on Wu you would have been screaming at the top of your lungs.... and still ignoring all the womens health /sexuality/adultery/etc issues.



Yes. Yes you did.

Some people shouldn't get too passionate about their partisan cheerleading. It fucks up their souls.

Maybe I'm not the only one who badly needs a vacation.



_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: BJ ban? - 9/3/2013 9:28:35 PM   
graceadieu


Posts: 1518
Joined: 3/20/2008
From: Maryland
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

And another meaningless fundy is going to be made famous.

These stories about nobody Republicans often seem to "break" right around the time a somebody Democrat gets convicted or goes off to prison on corruption charges. Will Jesse Jackson Jr. be arriving at his new home this week?


I don't think that the Republican candidate for governor of Virginia, a swing state that leans red, is a "meaningless fundy" or a "nobody Republican". He probably would've won, if he hadn't opened his mouth and let all his dumbass opinions out.

I do wonder, though, if it's all some crazy ploy to distract the public from Bob McDonnell's (current VA Republican governor) ongoing bribery scandal.

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: BJ ban? - 9/4/2013 7:35:33 AM   
leonine


Posts: 409
Joined: 11/3/2009
From: [email protected]
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

Sodomy should be banned at all costs.

It leads to drug use and promiscuity and all sorts of evils foisted upon us by the devil.

God was right, at Sodom & Gomorrah.



Regards,



Paul The Apostle

The awful sin for which the Cities of the Plain deserved to be hit by a volcano was that they didn't shelter strangers the way good desert nomads like the Hebrews did. Lot was spared because (even after living in the city for a while) he held to that code even if it meant sacrificing his daughters. (Though a couple of mere daughters weren't much of a sacrifice, if he'd been prepared to sacrifice a son or two that would have been impressive.)

The fact that the city mob wanted to rape the strangers was a minor side issue for the original authors and hearers of the story. It was only when the Hebrews had become city folks themselves, and forgotten nomad morality, that the point of the story was lost and it was misread as God-hates-fags.

_____________________________

Leo9


Gonna pack in my hand, pick up on a piece of land and build myself a cabin in the woods.
It's there I'm gonna stay, until there comes a day when this old world starts a-changing for the good.
- James Taylor

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: BJ ban? - 9/4/2013 2:04:14 PM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline 		It's called "sarcasm"

_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to leonine)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: BJ ban? - 9/4/2013 2:05:53 PM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

Really, the top of the chart currently goes to a state assembly Republican getting national coverage after being cited and released for pot and speeding, when yet another Democrat from the US House of Representatives, already resigned in disgrace, was convicted of using his campaign funds as personal piggybank.



I'm going to start a new thread, I think, about "Silence From The Left" (As a primer, I'll start with Tom Menino)

< Message edited by DaddySatyr -- 9/4/2013 2:06:08 PM >

_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: BJ ban? - 9/4/2013 2:30:52 PM   
MasterCaneman


Posts: 3842
Joined: 3/21/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: leonine


quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

Sodomy should be banned at all costs.

It leads to drug use and promiscuity and all sorts of evils foisted upon us by the devil.

God was right, at Sodom & Gomorrah.



Regards,



Paul The Apostle

The awful sin for which the Cities of the Plain deserved to be hit by a volcano was that they didn't shelter strangers the way good desert nomads like the Hebrews did. Lot was spared because (even after living in the city for a while) he held to that code even if it meant sacrificing his daughters. (Though a couple of mere daughters weren't much of a sacrifice, if he'd been prepared to sacrifice a son or two that would have been impressive.)

The fact that the city mob wanted to rape the strangers was a minor side issue for the original authors and hearers of the story. It was only when the Hebrews had become city folks themselves, and forgotten nomad morality, that the point of the story was lost and it was misread as God-hates-fags.

I always thought Sodom and Gomorrah were wiped out by the aliens using either a nuclear weapon or waste fuel from their engines. See what I get for listening to von Däniken...

< Message edited by MasterCaneman -- 9/4/2013 2:32:37 PM >

_____________________________

Age and treachery will always overcome youth and ambition.

The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting. ~ Sun Tzu

Goddess Wrangler



(in reply to leonine)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: BJ ban? - 9/4/2013 2:46:08 PM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterCaneman

I always thought Sodom and Gomorrah were wiped out by the aliens using either a nuclear weapon or waste fuel from their engines.



That's only if you watch "Ancient Aliens" on History Channel. Talk about a religious belief system! I forced myself to sit through two episodes and every "fact" they put forth starts with: "If you believe that aliens have visited this planet then, it's not outrageous to believe ..."



Regards,



Isaac Asimov

_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to MasterCaneman)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: BJ ban? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094