Zonie63 -> RE: The scum is dead (9/4/2013 5:38:15 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri quote:
ORIGINAL: Zonie63 quote:
ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri What was the debt to society this guy was going to pay? Was his debt to live out the rest of his natural life on the dime of society? If there was labor to be extracted from those inmates, that's one thing, but what was there truly to be gained? Is it truly justice for society to support this guy for the rest of his life (which they did, I point out in a darkly humorous way)? I understand perfectly what you're saying. As taxpayers, we don't want to pay to support these scumbags; I get that. He's dead now, and the taxpayers won't have to support him. But the thing is, society didn't order his execution. He wasn't given the death penalty, so in the eyes of the law and society, he was expected to serve out his sentence. That's what was decided in court. He chose his demise, as a way of saying "fuck you" to society and to his victims. (I suppose I might feel differently if another inmate killed him, as what happened with Dahmer.) And, here is where I don't quite understand the sentence. What's the point of allowing this guy to continue to live? Life in prison without parole + 1000 years? Does that mean his body is going to be in a cell for the next 1000 years? I understand the concept of paying one's debt to society, but how was this guy supposed to do that? Yeah, I know. Sometimes the criminal justice system can be a bit weird, but when they're dealing with extraordinarily heinous crimes like this, they must have to try to improvise some way. I don't really have a perfect answer here.
|
|
|
|