|
Phydeaux -> RE: Majority of Scientists skeptical of climate crisis (9/14/2013 8:27:48 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DomKen
quote:
ORIGINAL: Kirata
quote:
ORIGINAL: DomKen
None of those claims are proven false by you pathetic little graph and only one has turned out to be false but the fact is we'll likely see an ice clear Arctic Ocean by 2020. And no plateau of global temperatures has occurred.
As always... [:D]
K.
So prove your claims then. Or is this simply more pathetic snark with nothing to back it up as usual?
How about the forthcoming IPCC report on climate control?
Leaked copies of the report were obtined by the Mail. Final draft:
"leaked report makes the extraordinary concession that the world has been warming at only just over half the rate claimed by the IPCC in its last assessment, published in 2007. "
"But the new report says the true figure since 1951 has been only 0.12C per decade – a rate far below even the lowest computer prediction."
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2420783/Global-warming-just-HALF-said-Worlds-climate-scientists-admit-computers-got-effects-greenhouse-gases-wrong.html#ixzz2evc3an39
Funny, thats just about what Kirata said. Its also what Hayden said in the most recent energy advisor. Its also what the Cern Study said, and Svennie...
I've provided by this time - almost 10 quotes and graphs from all kinds of people including the prophet of Global warming - Mann that all confirm that global warming has not occurred in 16 years.
Kevin Trenbirth (global alarmist): The fact is that we can't account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can't."
Dr. Chris de Freitas, the editor of the journal Climate Research
Nobel Prize-winning physicist Ivar Giaever
I quote where NASA said that the CO2 contribution to global warming was much less than expected.
I quoted where Cern said the IPCC modelling of the contribution of aerosol cooling was not only wrong - but wrong by possible several orders of magnitude.
A recent study of a wide variety of policy options by Yale economist William Nordhaus showed that nearly the highest benefit-to-cost ratio is achieved for a policy that allows 50 more years of economic growth unimpeded by greenhouse gas controls.
Claude Allegre, former director of the Institute for the Study of the Earth, University of Paris; J. Scott Armstrong, cofounder of the Journal of Forecasting and the International Journal of Forecasting; Jan Breslow, head of the Laboratory of Biochemical Genetics and Metabolism, Rockefeller University; Roger Cohen, fellow, American Physical Society; Edward David, member, National Academy of Engineering and National Academy of Sciences; William Happer, professor of physics, Princeton; Michael Kelly, professor of technology, University of Cambridge, U.K.; William Kininmonth, former head of climate research at the Australian Bureau of Meteorology; Richard Lindzen, professor of atmospheric sciences, MIT; James McGrath, professor of chemistry, Virginia Technical University; Rodney Nichols, former president and CEO of the New York Academy of Sciences; Burt Rutan, aerospace engineer, designer of Voyager and SpaceShipOne; Harrison H. Schmitt, Apollo 17 astronaut and former U.S. senator; Nir Shaviv, professor of astrophysics, Hebrew University, Jerusalem; Henk Tennekes, former director, Royal Dutch Meteorological Service; Antonio Zichichi, president of the World Federation of Scientists, Geneva.
Your figures are WRONG, your SCIENCE IS WRONG.
|
|
|
|
