RE: Older"Milf type" Sub/Switch Wanted

RE: Older"Milf type" Sub/Switch Wanted (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity

Message

MasterCaneman -> RE: Older"Milf type" Sub/Switch Wanted (9/14/2013 9:37:23 AM)
Extremely off-topic, but how did the header in DesFIP's and my responses change from "Wood" to "RE: Older"Milf type" Sub/Switch Wanted"? ETA: answered my own question. OP edited the header title at some point.

ResidentSadist -> Seeking someone with sunglasses (9/14/2013 12:04:07 PM)
Nope . . . OP didn't edit it did they? I think a reply did. Like this one.

BossyShoeBitch -> RE: Seeking someone with sunglasses (9/14/2013 12:39:15 PM)
See. This is why I'm gone for weeks/months at a time. Ya'll are stee-range.

Spiritedsub2 -> RE: We can edit the thread title?! (9/14/2013 1:43:22 PM)
That seems like a snafu to me.

BossyShoeBitch -> RE: We've ALWAYS been able to do it. (9/14/2013 1:49:04 PM)
Seemed odd to me too though.

TallullahHk -> RE: We've ALWAYS been able to do it. (9/14/2013 3:07:45 PM)
Older"Milf type" was the original title of the OP's post and the orignal message was just a link to their profile. The OP changed it to Wood after the first few responses called them out for advertising. I suspect it reverted back to the original title when a mod moved it from General to Casual. ETA: Or I could actually read other responses before I respond. I'm going back to my nap.

DesFIP -> RE: We've ALWAYS been able to do it. (9/14/2013 9:10:11 PM)
And the answer to the how much wood is: "So the next time someone asks you, how much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood? You answer is clear! He'd chuck 361.9237001 cubic centrimeters of wood per day, which is the wood that a woodchuck COULD chuck, if a woodchuck could chuck wood." From here: http://scientopia.org/blogs/scicurious/2012/10/05/friday-weird-science-how-much-wood-could-a-woodchuck-chuck/

ResidentSadist -> Seeking oold toothless GILF type sub (9/15/2013 8:06:35 AM)
Thank you for the definitive answer 361 cubic centimeters.

HarryVanWinkle -> RE: Wood (9/15/2013 3:39:54 PM)
Esau Wood saws wood. Esau Wood would saw wood. Oh, the wood that Wood would saw. One day, Esau Wood saw a wood-saw saw wood like no other wood-saw Wood ever saw would saw wood. Now, Esau Wood saws wood with the wood-saw Wood saw saw wood.

ResidentSadist -> RE: Wood (9/15/2013 5:17:51 PM)
That's a new one on me.

MasterCaneman -> RE: Huh, I never knew that. Weird... (9/15/2013 7:59:49 PM)
That makes sense.

ivone57 -> RE: Older"Milf type" Sub/Switch Wanted (9/16/2013 8:57:33 AM)
i have no idea what you are talking about... wood for paddles or for the animal.... [&:]

MasterCaneman -> RE: The Thread Formerly Known As: Older"Milf type" Sub/Switch Wanted (9/16/2013 9:02:00 AM)
I imagine for the animal, although OP edited to remove his personal ad.

PeonForHer -> Ron's New Avatar is a Pansy (9/16/2013 11:58:29 AM)
Childish thread. I'm not posting on it.

Spiritedsub2 -> RE: This thread is the twilight zone (9/16/2013 2:39:11 PM)
But I wanna see Ron's new avatar.

PeonForHer -> Ron Has Extremely Stinky Armpits. (9/16/2013 4:17:43 PM)
Actually, Ron's avatar is great. It's inspired by the Korean pop sensation, Psy. However, Ron does smell.

Spiritedsub2 -> RE: Are his armpits the reason Ron is still vanilla? (9/16/2013 8:59:35 PM)
Despite 45 bazillion posts, he still has a vanilla cone with his nifty new avatar. I don't understand that, unless we can mutilate our cones and paddles the way we can torque the thread's subject.

Gauge -> RE: Are his armpits the reason Ron is still a virgin? (9/16/2013 9:33:55 PM)
He is not vanilla. He is the cone. Be the cone Ron. Be the cone.

stef -> RE: Are his armpits the reason Ron is still a virgin? (9/16/2013 9:38:55 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Gauge He is not vanilla. He is the cone. Be the cone Ron. Be the cone. He must be Beldar's long lost cousin.

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

5.078125E-02