MasterCaneman
Posts: 3842
Joined: 3/21/2013 Status: offline
|
What the people above said. I had a friend who decided one day he was going to be a photographer. Went out and dropped major $$ on cameras, tripods, lights and all that other crap. He even went so far as to make a dark room in his basement(this was the pre-digital 35mm era). After all that, we (his circle of friends) unanimously decreed he'd have been better with a drugstore 110. He sucked hard. No sense of composition, lighting, zip. Constantly used the wrong lenses, films, exposure times, you name it, he did it and did it wrong. On the other hand, I attended a showing by one of the people in my voice-acting group, and the young lady used a digital she bought at a drug store, and her images were first-class. She 'got it'. Angles, lighting, perspective, everything. They weren't just pictures, they were art. And all done with a camera that cost less than fifty bucks. If I find the link to her site, I'll post it, but I lost it the last time this computer crashed. Oh, and on that, hit Tumblr and see what the starving artist types are doing. There's some amazing photography up there. Let the course and your interests guide your purchasing decisions. If I were to give any technical advice, I'd say get a camera that bridges the gap between a casual picture-taker and one that has professional features. That way, if you decide later that it isn't your forte, you're not stuck with a couple thousand bucks worth of gear no one wants to buy. If you do buy, stick with major makers like Canon, Nikon, etc. Get one that you can expand with (different lenses, etc). Another thing to consider is, your future instructor may want you to get a certain type/level of camera for the course as well. Keep that in mind.
_____________________________
Age and treachery will always overcome youth and ambition. The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting. ~ Sun Tzu Goddess Wrangler
|