Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Interesting article from the Cato Institute...


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Interesting article from the Cato Institute... Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Interesting article from the Cato Institute... - 9/25/2013 4:04:17 PM   
RottenJohnny


Posts: 1677
Joined: 5/5/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
Like I said:
Would you like to join this discussion?
If so, perhaps one should acquaint themselves with the particulars of that conflict before they seek to discuss it.


It's his thread. He can discuss whatever he wants to.

_____________________________

"I find your arguments strewn with gaping defects in logic." - Mr. Spock

"Give me liberty or give me death." - Patrick Henry

I believe in common sense, not common opinions. - Me

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 81
RE: Interesting article from the Cato Institute... - 9/25/2013 4:07:08 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline 		As I said before:
Any time baby.

Thanks, but you're not my type.
For those who were not paying attention the invitation was to discussion.
Perhaps that is why discussion with you is not.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 82
RE: Interesting article from the Cato Institute... - 9/25/2013 4:12:24 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
Young man please do not try that "walk around the shit house" with me.

Why not? I'm having a blast.
And just for the record, the "I'm older than you therefore I know better" attitude does not impress me.

You are younger than I and seem quite happy to play children's games...thus the admonition to take that grammar school shit back to grammar school where it belongs.


quote:

My statement was and is that both sides were american.

But your comment was in regard to U.S. aggression. South Carolina was not part of the union.
Perhaps you can tell us just when the "states in rebellion" became a seperatge nation?
Perhaps a knowleldge of the difference between the words rebellion and revolution would be helpful. For the ignorant s. carolina and the rest of the confederacy were never a seperate nation.
the civil war was americans fighting americans...for any american to not know that is beyond comprehension.




(in reply to RottenJohnny)
Profile   Post #: 83
RE: Interesting article from the Cato Institute... - 9/25/2013 4:14:49 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
Like I said:
Would you like to join this discussion?
If so, perhaps one should acquaint themselves with the particulars of that conflict before they seek to discuss it.


It's his thread. He can discuss whatever he wants to.

Posting ignorant peurile asanine mindnumbingly stupid shit does not consitute discussion...it constitutes moronic bullshit.

(in reply to RottenJohnny)
Profile   Post #: 84
RE: Interesting article from the Cato Institute... - 9/25/2013 4:18:50 PM   
RottenJohnny


Posts: 1677
Joined: 5/5/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


quote:

ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
Like I said:
Would you like to join this discussion?
If so, perhaps one should acquaint themselves with the particulars of that conflict before they seek to discuss it.


It's his thread. He can discuss whatever he wants to.

Posting ignorant peurile asanine mindnumbingly stupid shit does not consitute discussion...it constitutes moronic bullshit.


Look who's talking.

_____________________________

"I find your arguments strewn with gaping defects in logic." - Mr. Spock

"Give me liberty or give me death." - Patrick Henry

I believe in common sense, not common opinions. - Me

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 85
RE: Interesting article from the Cato Institute... - 9/25/2013 7:00:27 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline 		Look who's talking.
The one who spanks the ass of the ignorant is who is talking

(in reply to RottenJohnny)
Profile   Post #: 86
RE: Interesting article from the Cato Institute... - 9/26/2013 12:38:51 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
Why did we issue an embargo on Japan?
Would you like to join this discussion?
If so, perhaps one should acquaint themselves with the particulars of that conflict before they seek to discuss it.


No discussion, then, eh? Nicely played.

Enjoy.


How can we have a discussion when I am the only one who seems to know why the u.s. and their allies embargoed japan.
When you wish to discuss something I am here.
I am not here to teach the fundamentals of ww2.
I am not here for you to send me running errands...do your own mother fucking research.
If I make a statent I can back it up.
If you do not agree that the u.s. knew about the attack in advance that is a bit of information that is ubiquitous.
What the "enumerated powers" are is rather murkey and they are not ubiquitous. Thus my desire for you to enucniate what you believe them to be.
As I said before:
Any time baby.


Ubiquitous does not mean what you obviously think it means.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 87
RE: Interesting article from the Cato Institute... - 9/26/2013 12:48:08 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

and none of the electoral college could vote that. As I said the electoral college is strictly party hacks.


When people vote for a candidate they are actually voting for a slate of electors to vote in the electoral college.
Usually they are friends and party members of the party from which the candidate is running. But there are numerous examples of them not being 'party hacks'. And sometimes they even vote against the candidate.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 88
RE: Interesting article from the Cato Institute... - 9/26/2013 12:55:05 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		yes, the examples are so numerous, we do not see them enumerated anywhere. Sort of like the proof of widespread voter fraud.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 89
RE: Interesting article from the Cato Institute... - 9/26/2013 12:57:28 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline 		And sometimes they even vote against the candidate.

That would be the point being made about how your vote does not count for shit.

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 90
RE: Interesting article from the Cato Institute... - 9/26/2013 1:00:05 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline 		Ubiquitous does not mean what you obviously think it means.

mind reader?

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 91
RE: Interesting article from the Cato Institute... - 9/26/2013 1:02:28 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		I will say you used it properly in the sentence and by god it looks like you know what it means, huntie.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 92
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Interesting article from the Cato Institute... Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109