DesideriScuri
Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: thompsonx
quote:
ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:
ORIGINAL: thompsonx
You fail to see ignore the risks being undertaken.
With a korportion there is no risk.
Why is it the government's job to remove the risk from the free enterprise system? Isn't that called socialism?
Do your own homework. I'm not your dictionary.
Why is it the govts job to remove risk from free enterprise? Is that one of those enumerated powers that you wont tell us about?
Incorporating doesn't alleviate all risk. The business can still fail. The business can make a faulty product and be lost. Incorporating prevents the business owner from losing everything he or she has.
So they do not have to be personally responsible which you say is what you believe in.
Kinda of a dichotomy ehh???
Not at all. They are still going to lose their business, aren't they? So, they are still taking a risk that others aren't taking.
_____________________________
What I support:
- A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
- Personal Responsibility
- Help for the truly needy
- Limited Government
- Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)
|
RE: Cleveland Clinic Cutting 300 million - due to obama... - 
Profile
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread