|
Politesub53 -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (10/6/2013 4:28:49 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: BamaD
quote:
ORIGINAL: thezeppo
quote:
ORIGINAL: BamaD
No we see disgusting and perverted as resorting to name calling rather than honest debate
quote:
ORIGINAL: BamaD
On the other hand here I am free to point out that you are a reprehensible excuse for a human being with the analytical skills of my dog and a level of arrogance virtually unparalleled and totally unjustified.
This was funny yesterday when I was drunk, and its still funny now I'm hungover. Without even getting into you calling someone else arrogant after using the royal 'we' to extrapolate your first statement across America, these two posts were less than an hour apart! What a gobshite you are [;)]
Slightly more on topic, when I hear of a gun-related tragedy in the United States my instinctive reaction is 'why do they all have to have guns?' I don't personally like them and I don't really get it when posters argue that more guns should be introduced in the wake of a tragedy. I've come to understand that there is a cultural divide in this regard and that it would be unfair to judge one side by the standards of the other. I've also come around to the idea that I'm a hypocrite if I argue that there should be tighter gun control or a ban on guns in the wake of tragic events. Its not a perfect analogy but if someone were to play Grand Theft Auto for 24 hours straight and then drive their car into a group of people I would still fully expect to be able to keep my copy of the game. I don't think people like MasterCaneman and DaddySatyr should have their guns taken away because someone else miles away committed an atrocity. I suppose I'm coming around to the personal responsibility argument - with the proviso that anyone whose gun is used to commit murder should be tried for the same crime, if they aren't already.
In the first post I was not using the royal we.
That was the we as in those of us who think we are being talked down to think so because.
I used we because I was speaking for a group.
The second post was because he had spent 6 pages insulting me on a moderated thread and has a history of doing so until I respond in kind.
Then he denies being the person who reports me for doing so.
I was catching up in one post for the better part of a week of abusive posts from him.
Six pages correcting your errors is not the same as six pages insulting you. You should get your facts right before making dubious claims. If you think I am insulting you then fucking report me, if you think I am trying to get the thread closed, then fucking report me. The mods will warn me soon enough. It is beyond your capability to work out anyone can report any post, the mods will then read the thread in question and clean up anything they see fit, be it your errors, or my errors. Unless you are special, and not just special needs, the mods will also send you gold letters, as they do me. Each one explains why a post has been pulled. Stop bleating about it, man up and accept your gold letters like everyone else does, including me. You dont get gold letters for something someone else has written.
I will also state clearly I have never reported you before this thread, you are just making shit up in order to look good. Admin have my permission to tell you if I am lying or not.
I did report your post Zeppo quoted though, but even then I asked if I was able to reply in kind without breaking the TOS as per the OP.
As for pointing out your errors, I am at liberty, as per the TOS to question content. If it`s dubious I will say so, likewise if its nonsense or just.......well just fucking laughable. If you cant handle that, then get your facts right before you post, like most people try and do.
You should note I am not the only one able to spot the hypocrisy of your posts, I am just the one who can normally be arsed to point it out.
|
|
|
|
