quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro

Not plagiarism I never claimed it was mine original or new

quote:

ORIGINAL: Yachtie

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro

Not plagiarism I never claimed it was mine original or new

Irrelevant. In your case, it's the omission of attribution.

The most blatant example of this is to directly copy something word for word. It does not matter if it is only a phrase. If it is not yours, either do not use it or place it in quotes and reference it. There are different methods for doing this. The important thing is that the reader can tell what is yours, and what is someone else's. (bolding added)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro

quote:

ORIGINAL: Yachtie

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro

Not plagiarism I never claimed it was mine original or new

Irrelevant. In your case, it's the omission of attribution.

The most blatant example of this is to directly copy something word for word. It does not matter if it is only a phrase. If it is not yours, either do not use it or place it in quotes and reference it. There are different methods for doing this. The important thing is that the reader can tell what is yours, and what is someone else's. (bolding added)


Somebody let the dog out Please.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Yachtie

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro

quote:

ORIGINAL: Yachtie

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro

Not plagiarism I never claimed it was mine original or new

Irrelevant. In your case, it's the omission of attribution.

The most blatant example of this is to directly copy something word for word. It does not matter if it is only a phrase. If it is not yours, either do not use it or place it in quotes and reference it. There are different methods for doing this. The important thing is that the reader can tell what is yours, and what is someone else's. (bolding added)


Somebody let the dog out Please.

Well? Have you been put out yet?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro

quote:

ORIGINAL: Yachtie

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro

quote:

ORIGINAL: Yachtie

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro

Not plagiarism I never claimed it was mine original or new

Irrelevant. In your case, it's the omission of attribution.

The most blatant example of this is to directly copy something word for word. It does not matter if it is only a phrase. If it is not yours, either do not use it or place it in quotes and reference it. There are different methods for doing this. The important thing is that the reader can tell what is yours, and what is someone else's. (bolding added)


Somebody let the dog out Please.

Well? Have you been put out yet?

Can't debate can you.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Yachtie

Debate what ?

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

quote:

ORIGINAL: Yachtie

Debate what ?

"In your post you should it was irrelevant"

That's what.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

U S citizens in the south were subjected to Jim crow and segregation wrong but not apartheid which was much worse and was in South Africa in case you are unaware Africa and America are not the same thing. And even if true does not affect my status as a citizen.
saying that I was complaining the thread could be shut down is a lie cause I had stated you were insulting me to get the thread shut down indicates you don't speak English.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Yachtie

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

quote:

ORIGINAL: Yachtie

Debate what ?

"In your post you should it was irrelevant"

That's what.

Is that what he wishes to debate? Or that he is a plagiarist? Or that he hasn't been let out yet?

Yes, I did say it's irrelevant. Then I showed why. What is there to debate on that?

quote:

It was just a shot in the dark.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro

Both were done by Christians to save the souls of those they believed needed saving.

The Inquisitions had nothing to do with "saving souls". The sole and exclusive purpose of the Medieval Inquisition was the eradication of heresy. The Spanish Inquisition was established independently, with only the reluctant approval of Sixtus IV, mainly for the purpose of uniting Spain under the Catholic rule of Ferdinand and Isabella.

With that as a hint that you don't know what you're talking about, I'll leave you to redo your homework on the Witch Trials.

K.

HERESY:
a : adherence to a religious opinion contrary to church dogma

b : denial of a revealed truth by a baptized member of the Roman Catholic Church

c : an opinion or doctrine contrary to church dogma

The Inquisition was created through papal bull, Ad Abolendam, issued at the end of the 12th century by Pope Lucius III. However in Spain little attention was paid to heresy by the Catholic ruling class. Jews and Muslims were considered inferior to Catholics and were subject to discriminatory legislation. The Inquisition was originally intended in large part to ensure the orthodoxy of those who converted from Judaism and Islam. This regulation of the faith of the newly converted was intensified after the royal decrees issued in 1492 and 1501 ordering Jews and Muslims to convert or leave. Nevertheless, in some parts of Spain towards the end of the 14th century, there was a wave of violent anti-Judaism, encouraged by the preaching of Ferrand Martinez, Archdeacon of Ecija. The pogroms of June 1391 were especially bloody: in Seville, hundreds of Jews were killed, and the synagogue was completely destroyed. The number of people killed was also high in other cities, such as Córdoba, Valencia and Barcelona. A consequences of these programs was the mass conversion of Jews. Forced baptism was contrary to the law of the Catholic Church, and theoretically anybody who had been forcibly baptized could legally return to Judaism; this however was very narrowly interpreted. Legal definitions of the time theoretically acknowledged that a forced baptism was not a valid sacrament, but confined this to cases where it was literally administered by physical force: a person who had consented to baptism under threat of death or serious injury was still regarded as a voluntary convert, and accordingly forbidden to revert to Judaism.

A can't wait to read what you have to say about Witch Trials, you would make a great writer of fairy tales.
And I am sure you have read "Der Hexenhammer".

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
Here we know there is a big difference between our misconduct and that of the South Africans.
I understand that Europeans may not see the difference.
I also understand that some (not you or anyone else in particular) may not want to see the difference.

I grant you that one. lol.
And you may well be right.

But from a general PoV, it just seems to be the same thing no matter who thought of it, who enforced it, or for whatever reasoning they had for it.

It pretty much boils down to the same thing: mistreatment of one race (black) in severe preference of another (white).

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

U S citizens in the south were subjected to Jim crow and segregation wrong but not apartheid which was much worse and was in South Africa in case you are unaware Africa and America are not the same thing. And even if true does not affect my status as a citizen.
saying that I was complaining the thread could be shut down is a lie cause I had stated you were insulting me to get the thread shut down indicates you don't speak English.

Segregation and apartheid are two different things ? Are you serious ?......sadly I know you are.

This was in my post.......You have clearly accused me several times of trying to get threads closed by insulting you.
This was your reply.......I had stated you were insulting me to get the thread shut
Maybe you need to rethink who cant speak English. You ought to have used "understand" and not "speak"

Dont get all pissy bruv, twas but you who wanted me to come to the party.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wendel27

 ''Hmmmm.....that makes sense too like the criminal is going to comply with the law keeping his gun locked up even though it's unlawful to have it in the first place.''

Yes that's precisely why the streets of Britain are a bloodbath with criminals mowing down innocent people on a whim. Which in turn is why our murder rate is so much higher than in America.... Except that simply isn't the case. It's much harder to get access to a firearm in Britain which in turn makes it much harder for a criminal to possess one. Not impossible but I'm yet to see a system which can offer such blanket security.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

Lmfao....Did you miss your post using the word speak....you know, the one I clearly quoted. The one you re-quoted in the post above this.

Start a thread on what being the same ? Do you mean apartheid and segregation ?

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin


If you're happy with your security blanket, severe restrictions on firearms, video cameras on every street corner and all the rest of it, I'm tickled plum to death.

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin


If you're happy with your security blanket, severe restrictions on firearms, video cameras on every street corner and all the rest of it, I'm tickled plum to death.

It is quite a valuable freedom, you know, that you can walk around without fear of anyone trying to shoot you. Having the ability to defend yourself (with your own gun) isn't a patch on not even needing to defend yourself.

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin


If you're happy with your security blanket, severe restrictions on firearms, video cameras on every street corner and all the rest of it, I'm tickled plum to death.

It is quite a valuable freedom, you know, that you can walk around without fear of anyone trying to shoot you. Having the ability to defend yourself (with your own gun) isn't a patch on not even needing to defend yourself.

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin


If you're happy with your security blanket, severe restrictions on firearms, video cameras on every street corner and all the rest of it, I'm tickled plum to death.

It is quite a valuable freedom, you know, that you can walk around without fear of anyone trying to shoot you. Having the ability to defend yourself (with your own gun) isn't a patch on not even needing to defend yourself.

Most of us go through an entire lifetime without the need of a firearm for self defense. In most places no one is walking around in fear.