RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


lovmuffin -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (10/2/2013 11:55:02 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Yachtie

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

Yep, schoolkids should go to school armed.




Once upon a time kids would go to school and leave their, most often, .22 cal rifles in their lockers as to go hunting after school.

And here.


At my school we brought our shotguns. We left them in our vehicles though. At one of the high schools there was a target range in the basement for .22 caliber only. It was used for the youth NRA marksmanship program.




PeonForHer -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (10/2/2013 1:57:14 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin
At my school we brought our shotguns. We left them in our vehicles though. At one of the high schools there was a target range in the basement for .22 caliber only. It was used for the youth NRA marksmanship program.


That's not good enough at all. It wouldn't have worked in Columbine. The kids need to have their guns or rifles on their desks loaded and ready at all times. Teachers should have machine guns mounted on their lecterns and parents could club together to buy a small but serviceable cannon to put in the school yard. Husbands and wives should *never* fall to sleep in the same bed with one another without the one having a gun resting fondly against the other's forehead across the sheets. Unborn foetuses are people too, of course - as we're often being reminded - so I see no reason why the 2nd shouldn't apply to them, too; therefore they should also be packing heat. Is it beyond the limits of our technology to build a firearm small enough to whop up a pregnant woman's vadge and the into the tiny half-formed hand of every right-thinking all-American foetus? I don't think so.

I keep emailing the NRA with these practical and realistic thoughts but they never reply. Bunch of fucking limp-wristed commie liberal pansy-assed surrender-monkeys.




MasterCaneman -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (10/2/2013 2:48:12 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin
At my school we brought our shotguns. We left them in our vehicles though. At one of the high schools there was a target range in the basement for .22 caliber only. It was used for the youth NRA marksmanship program.


That's not good enough at all. It wouldn't have worked in Columbine. The kids need to have their guns or rifles on their desks loaded and ready at all times. Teachers should have machine guns mounted on their lecterns and parents could club together to buy a small but serviceable cannon to put in the school yard. Husbands and wives should *never* fall to sleep in the same bed with one another without the one having a gun resting fondly against the other's forehead across the sheets. Unborn foetuses are people too, of course - as we're often being reminded - so I see no reason why the 2nd shouldn't apply to them, too; therefore they should also be packing heat. Is it beyond the limits of our technology to build a firearm small enough to whop up a pregnant woman's vadge and the into the tiny half-formed hand of every right-thinking all-American foetus? I don't think so.

I keep emailing the NRA with these practical and realistic thoughts but they never reply. Bunch of fucking limp-wristed commie liberal pansy-assed surrender-monkeys.

Ask and ye shall receive.


[image]local://upfiles/1614272/F3AD43F06E2946A0AE1DAEFD5F49F6D2.jpg[/image]

Of course, it is made by the Swiss, but that's beside the point. The rest of your post is amusing, if nothing else. I believe it's entirely reasonable to have properly trained staff inside a school in case the unthinkable happens again. The psychos aren't as crazy as people think they are. They know where to go to inflict the maximum damage. What's wrong with having a few key people in each school building able to respond? Average police response times, even for a school shooting, leaves a large window of opportunity to raise the body count.

Having a few armed teachers, janitors, whoever on site may mean the difference between an unauthorized armed intrusion and a massacre. No one's saying posting armed guards in every hall, or having teachers packing openly (although in some districts it might be feasible). And schools need to do a better job at point access control than they do now.




RottenJohnny -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (10/2/2013 3:27:59 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterCaneman

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer
Is it beyond the limits of our technology to build a firearm small enough to whop up a pregnant woman's vadge and the into the tiny half-formed hand of every right-thinking all-American foetus? I don't think so.

Ask and ye shall receive.

[image]local://upfiles/1614272/F3AD43F06E2946A0AE1DAEFD5F49F6D2.jpg[/image]


[sm=rofl.gif]

That was just fucking awesome!




PeonForHer -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (10/2/2013 4:44:17 PM)

Wow. OK. [:D] Bereft of words.

Journalist to Mohandas K Gandhi: "What do you think of Western Civilization"

Gandhi: "I think it would be a good idea."




BamaD -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (10/2/2013 4:44:41 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

It's not my problem who you choose to engage with, or which translation of the Bible you like.

If people want to make this dead preacher a poster child, and play the WWJD card, I'm perfectly happy to shove it back in their faces.

[:D]

(And if the rape allegation is true, I wouldn't convict from the jury box)

And this killing has nothing to do with having guns in church.




BamaD -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (10/2/2013 4:49:47 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro


quote:

ORIGINAL: Just0Us0Two


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

It doesn't say you can carry in those places it says you can carry there if there is no objection from management.
I can't see any bar not objecting.
There is a church in Colorado where a member used a gun to protect the congregation.
Remember Christ used a bullwhip on people in the temple.


Wrong again, no surprise

"When it was almost time for the Jewish Passover, Jesus went up to Jerusalem. 14 In the temple courts he found people selling cattle, sheep and doves, and others sitting at tables exchanging money. 15 So he made a whip out of cords, and drove all from the temple courts, both sheep and cattle; he scattered the coins of the money changers and overturned their tables. 16 To those who sold doves he said, “Get these out of here! Stop turning my Father’s house into a market!” 17 His disciples remembered that it is written: “Zeal for your house will consume me.” John 2:13-17 New International Version.

I still find it hard to understand that a place were love, understanding and compassion are suppose to be practice there are also guns. But I am agnostic, so much for christian love.


I'm confused, how exactly does your quote somehow prove that he's "wrong again"? Bama said Christ used a bullwhip, your quote says he made a whip out of cord. Seems like semantics to me.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/la-pastor-shot-killed-church-service-article-1.1470490

As to why someone might choose to carry a gun in church, perhaps for the same reason that gun-free school zones don't work. Thugs like to prey on the unarmed. In the link I posted above, a former deacon of the church entered and shot the pastor dead during a sermon. Maybe if someone other then the killer had also been armed, the Pastor would still be alive.

Love and compassion are all well and good, but Loving thy neighbor as you would yourself doesn't mean you have to allow yourself to be killed. The bible doesn't say you can't kill, it says that you can't murder. Subtle difference perhaps, but an important one when it comes to the right to self defense.


First of all a bull whip is not made of cord, I know a person who makes bull whips and that not how it is made. You are sighting a single incident so I fail to see justification for guns, also you have a lot of assumptions. Perhaps you are confused between religion and movie Zardoz?[;)]

The point is not what kind of whip was used the point is He resorted to violence in the temple.
A typical feeble attempt to discredit through an irrelevant argument.




BamaD -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (10/2/2013 4:52:54 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

As to why someone might choose to carry a gun in church, perhaps for the same reason that gun-free school zones don't work. Thugs like to prey on the unarmed. In the link I posted above, a former deacon of the church entered and shot the pastor dead during a sermon. Maybe if someone other then the killer had also been armed, the Pastor would still be alive.

Love and compassion are all well and good, but Loving thy neighbor as you would yourself doesn't mean you have to allow yourself to be killed.


Yep, schoolkids should go to school armed. After all, the 2nd Amendment doesn't mention a lower age limit, does it?


Also, forget neighbours that aren't all that 'loving' - more people get killed by members of their own families. So, all mothers and fathers, and all their children, should be armed at all times when at home. It's the only way forward to a mature, Godly and civilised society.


Skip to reality only those without concern with reality believe anyone wants to arm chidren




Nosathro -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (10/2/2013 5:02:34 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro


quote:

ORIGINAL: Just0Us0Two


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

It doesn't say you can carry in those places it says you can carry there if there is no objection from management.
I can't see any bar not objecting.
There is a church in Colorado where a member used a gun to protect the congregation.
Remember Christ used a bullwhip on people in the temple.


Wrong again, no surprise

"When it was almost time for the Jewish Passover, Jesus went up to Jerusalem. 14 In the temple courts he found people selling cattle, sheep and doves, and others sitting at tables exchanging money. 15 So he made a whip out of cords, and drove all from the temple courts, both sheep and cattle; he scattered the coins of the money changers and overturned their tables. 16 To those who sold doves he said, “Get these out of here! Stop turning my Father’s house into a market!” 17 His disciples remembered that it is written: “Zeal for your house will consume me.” John 2:13-17 New International Version.

I still find it hard to understand that a place were love, understanding and compassion are suppose to be practice there are also guns. But I am agnostic, so much for christian love.


I'm confused, how exactly does your quote somehow prove that he's "wrong again"? Bama said Christ used a bullwhip, your quote says he made a whip out of cord. Seems like semantics to me.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/la-pastor-shot-killed-church-service-article-1.1470490

As to why someone might choose to carry a gun in church, perhaps for the same reason that gun-free school zones don't work. Thugs like to prey on the unarmed. In the link I posted above, a former deacon of the church entered and shot the pastor dead during a sermon. Maybe if someone other then the killer had also been armed, the Pastor would still be alive.

Love and compassion are all well and good, but Loving thy neighbor as you would yourself doesn't mean you have to allow yourself to be killed. The bible doesn't say you can't kill, it says that you can't murder. Subtle difference perhaps, but an important one when it comes to the right to self defense.


First of all a bull whip is not made of cord, I know a person who makes bull whips and that not how it is made. You are sighting a single incident so I fail to see justification for guns, also you have a lot of assumptions. Perhaps you are confused between religion and movie Zardoz?[;)]

The point is not what kind of whip was used the point is He resorted to violence in the temple.
A typical feeble attempt to discredit through an irrelevant argument.


Your the one who claimed it was a bull whip. It is only found in one version which I took the quote, also he used it on animals not people.




Nosathro -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (10/2/2013 5:11:58 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

As to why someone might choose to carry a gun in church, perhaps for the same reason that gun-free school zones don't work. Thugs like to prey on the unarmed. In the link I posted above, a former deacon of the church entered and shot the pastor dead during a sermon. Maybe if someone other then the killer had also been armed, the Pastor would still be alive.

Love and compassion are all well and good, but Loving thy neighbor as you would yourself doesn't mean you have to allow yourself to be killed.


Yep, schoolkids should go to school armed. After all, the 2nd Amendment doesn't mention a lower age limit, does it?


Also, forget neighbours that aren't all that 'loving' - more people get killed by members of their own families. So, all mothers and fathers, and all their children, should be armed at all times when at home. It's the only way forward to a mature, Godly and civilised society.


Skip to reality only those without concern with reality believe anyone wants to arm chidren


Really you mean like this:

http://www.azfamily.com/news/Accidental-shooting-by-boyfriend-leaves-woman-dead-226079871.html

or this


http://citizensvoice.com/news/woman-killed-in-wilkes-barre-domestic-dispute-1.1559555

and guns made for kids

http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/05/03/18014902-guns-made-for-kids-how-young-is-too-young-to-shoot?lite

Now that is reality.




BamaD -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (10/2/2013 5:30:15 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro


quote:

ORIGINAL: Just0Us0Two


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

It doesn't say you can carry in those places it says you can carry there if there is no objection from management.
I can't see any bar not objecting.
There is a church in Colorado where a member used a gun to protect the congregation.
Remember Christ used a bullwhip on people in the temple.


Wrong again, no surprise

"When it was almost time for the Jewish Passover, Jesus went up to Jerusalem. 14 In the temple courts he found people selling cattle, sheep and doves, and others sitting at tables exchanging money. 15 So he made a whip out of cords, and drove all from the temple courts, both sheep and cattle; he scattered the coins of the money changers and overturned their tables. 16 To those who sold doves he said, “Get these out of here! Stop turning my Father’s house into a market!” 17 His disciples remembered that it is written: “Zeal for your house will consume me.” John 2:13-17 New International Version.

I still find it hard to understand that a place were love, understanding and compassion are suppose to be practice there are also guns. But I am agnostic, so much for christian love.


I'm confused, how exactly does your quote somehow prove that he's "wrong again"? Bama said Christ used a bullwhip, your quote says he made a whip out of cord. Seems like semantics to me.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/la-pastor-shot-killed-church-service-article-1.1470490

As to why someone might choose to carry a gun in church, perhaps for the same reason that gun-free school zones don't work. Thugs like to prey on the unarmed. In the link I posted above, a former deacon of the church entered and shot the pastor dead during a sermon. Maybe if someone other then the killer had also been armed, the Pastor would still be alive.

Love and compassion are all well and good, but Loving thy neighbor as you would yourself doesn't mean you have to allow yourself to be killed. The bible doesn't say you can't kill, it says that you can't murder. Subtle difference perhaps, but an important one when it comes to the right to self defense.


First of all a bull whip is not made of cord, I know a person who makes bull whips and that not how it is made. You are sighting a single incident so I fail to see justification for guns, also you have a lot of assumptions. Perhaps you are confused between religion and movie Zardoz?[;)]

The point is not what kind of whip was used the point is He resorted to violence in the temple.
A typical feeble attempt to discredit through an irrelevant argument.


Your the one who claimed it was a bull whip. It is only found in one version which I took the quote, also he used it on animals not people.

Money changers aren't people?
And you have read every version, every translation of the Bible?
And you are only 50 something. That alone would have taken 20 years, are you sure your not 100+,
You would have to be to have done all you claim.




BamaD -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (10/2/2013 5:38:21 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

As to why someone might choose to carry a gun in church, perhaps for the same reason that gun-free school zones don't work. Thugs like to prey on the unarmed. In the link I posted above, a former deacon of the church entered and shot the pastor dead during a sermon. Maybe if someone other then the killer had also been armed, the Pastor would still be alive.

Love and compassion are all well and good, but Loving thy neighbor as you would yourself doesn't mean you have to allow yourself to be killed.


Yep, schoolkids should go to school armed. After all, the 2nd Amendment doesn't mention a lower age limit, does it?


Also, forget neighbours that aren't all that 'loving' - more people get killed by members of their own families. So, all mothers and fathers, and all their children, should be armed at all times when at home. It's the only way forward to a mature, Godly and civilised society.


Skip to reality only those without concern with reality believe anyone wants to arm chidren


Really you mean like this:

http://www.azfamily.com/news/Accidental-shooting-by-boyfriend-leaves-woman-dead-226079871.html

or this


http://citizensvoice.com/news/woman-killed-in-wilkes-barre-domestic-dispute-1.1559555

and guns made for kids

http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/05/03/18014902-guns-made-for-kids-how-young-is-too-young-to-shoot?lite

Now that is reality.

Again you intentionally misunderstand.
None of these promote sending kids to school with guns.




PeonForHer -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (10/2/2013 6:03:30 PM)

quote:

Skip to reality only those without concern with reality believe anyone wants to arm chidren


I agree. Even the most ludicrous of gun nuts here on CM doesn't seem to love the idea of small kids packing firearms. Great, as far as I'm concerned.

It's just that I've seen so many people standing proud, jaws and chest thrust out, as they proclaim their true support for the purest interpretation of the 2nd Amendment while never once considering children as people.

Why? Now, if it's self-evident that we can all safely disregard the 2nd Amendment when it comes to considering children as people (therefore holding the right to be armed along with people who just so happen to be over, say, 16, 18 or 21) why shouldn't we all safely disregard lots more of it? Or even all of it?




BamaD -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (10/2/2013 6:12:32 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

Skip to reality only those without concern with reality believe anyone wants to arm chidren


I agree. Even the most ludicrous of gun nuts here on CM doesn't seem to love the idea of small kids packing firearms. Great, as far as I'm concerned.

It's just that I've seen so many people standing proud, jaws and chest thrust out, as they proclaim their true support for the purest interpretation of the 2nd Amendment while never once considering children as people.

Why? Now, if it's self-evident that we can all safely disregard the 2nd Amendment when it comes to considering children as people (therefore holding the right to be armed along with people who just so happen to be over, say, 16, 18 or 21) why shouldn't we all safely disregard lots more of it? Or even all of it?

It is quite consistent, children are not capable of handling any of the responsibilities of citizenship so they don't gt the full rights.




Just0Us0Two -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (10/2/2013 7:39:52 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro


quote:

ORIGINAL: Just0Us0Two


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

It doesn't say you can carry in those places it says you can carry there if there is no objection from management.
I can't see any bar not objecting.
There is a church in Colorado where a member used a gun to protect the congregation.
Remember Christ used a bullwhip on people in the temple.


Wrong again, no surprise

"When it was almost time for the Jewish Passover, Jesus went up to Jerusalem. 14 In the temple courts he found people selling cattle, sheep and doves, and others sitting at tables exchanging money. 15 So he made a whip out of cords, and drove all from the temple courts, both sheep and cattle; he scattered the coins of the money changers and overturned their tables. 16 To those who sold doves he said, “Get these out of here! Stop turning my Father’s house into a market!” 17 His disciples remembered that it is written: “Zeal for your house will consume me.” John 2:13-17 New International Version.

I still find it hard to understand that a place were love, understanding and compassion are suppose to be practice there are also guns. But I am agnostic, so much for christian love.


I'm confused, how exactly does your quote somehow prove that he's "wrong again"? Bama said Christ used a bullwhip, your quote says he made a whip out of cord. Seems like semantics to me.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/la-pastor-shot-killed-church-service-article-1.1470490

As to why someone might choose to carry a gun in church, perhaps for the same reason that gun-free school zones don't work. Thugs like to prey on the unarmed. In the link I posted above, a former deacon of the church entered and shot the pastor dead during a sermon. Maybe if someone other then the killer had also been armed, the Pastor would still be alive.

Love and compassion are all well and good, but Loving thy neighbor as you would yourself doesn't mean you have to allow yourself to be killed. The bible doesn't say you can't kill, it says that you can't murder. Subtle difference perhaps, but an important one when it comes to the right to self defense.


First of all a bull whip is not made of cord, I know a person who makes bull whips and that not how it is made. You are sighting a single incident so I fail to see justification for guns, also you have a lot of assumptions. Perhaps you are confused between religion and movie Zardoz?[;)]


Since you didn't like my single source, here are a few more I found after a very short search.

http://www.wsoctv.com/news/news/local/church-goers-pray-during-armed-robbery/nTkg3/
http://www.sj-r.com/breaking/x1578916160/East-St-Louis-churchgoers-robbed
http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/2009-08-09/news/0908090020_1_palm-beach-county-robbery-spanish-language-church
http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2013/01/18/New-York-church-goers-get-robbed-during-service
http://unioncounty.wbtv.com/news/news/77472-church-goers-robbed-gunpoint-police-say
http://www.clarionledger.com/article/20130618/NEWS/130618008/Jackson-church-goers-robbed-gunpoint

Regarding your comment about whips; hmmmm, I guess you'd better get busy letting all the folks who make whips out of nylon cord know that they're doing it wrong. I know several locals who braid their own single-tails out of nylon (and yes I realize that all single-tails aren't "bullwhips"), and I've seen quite a few of varying styles for sale at stores and online. Even David Morgan is making bull and stock whips out of nylon cord. Although I still think that nitpicking one word out of a post and trying to use that to invalidate the entire post is rather small minded.

http://www.davidmorgan.com/product_info.php?products_id=1263
http://www.cowwhips.com/12-plait-nylon-bullwhip/#.UkzRLBDX81I
http://www.midwestwhips.com/NylonWhips.html
http://www.westernwhips.com/nylon-whips.html
http://www.happycracking.com/Pages/default.aspx




BamaD -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (10/2/2013 7:46:20 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro


quote:

ORIGINAL: Just0Us0Two


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

It doesn't say you can carry in those places it says you can carry there if there is no objection from management.
I can't see any bar not objecting.
There is a church in Colorado where a member used a gun to protect the congregation.
Remember Christ used a bullwhip on people in the temple.


Wrong again, no surprise

"When it was almost time for the Jewish Passover, Jesus went up to Jerusalem. 14 In the temple courts he found people selling cattle, sheep and doves, and others sitting at tables exchanging money. 15 So he made a whip out of cords, and drove all from the temple courts, both sheep and cattle; he scattered the coins of the money changers and overturned their tables. 16 To those who sold doves he said, “Get these out of here! Stop turning my Father’s house into a market!” 17 His disciples remembered that it is written: “Zeal for your house will consume me.” John 2:13-17 New International Version.

I still find it hard to understand that a place were love, understanding and compassion are suppose to be practice there are also guns. But I am agnostic, so much for christian love.


I'm confused, how exactly does your quote somehow prove that he's "wrong again"? Bama said Christ used a bullwhip, your quote says he made a whip out of cord. Seems like semantics to me.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/la-pastor-shot-killed-church-service-article-1.1470490

As to why someone might choose to carry a gun in church, perhaps for the same reason that gun-free school zones don't work. Thugs like to prey on the unarmed. In the link I posted above, a former deacon of the church entered and shot the pastor dead during a sermon. Maybe if someone other then the killer had also been armed, the Pastor would still be alive.

Love and compassion are all well and good, but Loving thy neighbor as you would yourself doesn't mean you have to allow yourself to be killed. The bible doesn't say you can't kill, it says that you can't murder. Subtle difference perhaps, but an important one when it comes to the right to self defense.


First of all a bull whip is not made of cord, I know a person who makes bull whips and that not how it is made. You are sighting a single incident so I fail to see justification for guns, also you have a lot of assumptions. Perhaps you are confused between religion and movie Zardoz?[;)]

The point is not what kind of whip was used the point is He resorted to violence in the temple.
A typical feeble attempt to discredit through an irrelevant argument.


Your the one who claimed it was a bull whip. It is only found in one version which I took the quote, also he used it on animals not people.

I stand corrected, the King James version uses the word scourge, a type of whip to inhumane to use on anything but people.
This by the way reinforces my original post.




BamaD -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (10/2/2013 7:47:24 PM)

Although I still think that nitpicking one word out of a post and trying to use that to invalidate the entire post is rather small minded.


That is SOP for him.




lovmuffin -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (10/2/2013 11:11:12 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


Why? Now, if it's self-evident that we can all safely disregard the 2nd Amendment when it comes to considering children as people (therefore holding the right to be armed along with people who just so happen to be over, say, 16, 18 or 21) why shouldn't we all safely disregard lots more of it? Or even all of it?


Who is we ? You guys already pretty much disgarded whatever rights you had to own firearms. You don't see us pushing the British to arm themselves. What's the big concern in disarming us ? Now that I think about it, I like the idea, Arm The British!!!! Could I interest you in a select fire STG 58 FN FAL, battle rifle of the free world. Cartel express shipping and handling is extra.





GotSteel -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (10/3/2013 12:09:54 AM)

Looks like snippets of the bill have been posted a couple of times now. Thing is those "restrictions" that are getting quoted are essentially fake in that they are already in place. What that quoted portion was actually designed to do is replace existing law which allowed judges to also look at voluntary commitment and didn't have a time limit.

quote:

ORIGINAL: EdBowie
The propaganda to deny due process to people by smearing them with the broader label of 'nutjob', or 'crook', or 'handicapped', and conflate the whole category with a small section of it, is a denial of basic equality.


We shouldn't be giving anyone who's ability to reason is severely compromised a gun and especially not people suffering from paranoid delusions. It takes a real idiot to confuse "nutjob" with tourrette's. This is not tourette's:

Alexis told police he believed people were following him and "sending vibrations into his body," according to a Newport police report.He told police that he had twice moved hotels to avoid the noise he heard coming through the floor and the ceiling of his rooms, and that the people following him were using "some sort of microwave machine" to prevent him from sleeping.

When it comes to Cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs we shouldn't just leave these people who are so clearly broken to their own devices until such time as we're absolutely sure that their a threat to themselves/others. If the police had been able to force Aaron to get treatment there's every reason to believe he could have had a long productive life. But instead he fell through the cracks and there were very real consequences. 51 cards short of a deck and everyone knows it is the stereotype for mass shooters, but we have a system engineered to be so broken that nothings done.

That's the broken system Georgia Republican's were looking at when they decided. You know what this needs, more cracks!






PeonForHer -> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** (10/3/2013 2:08:02 AM)

quote:


Who is we ? You guys already pretty much disgarded whatever rights you had to own firearms. You don't see us pushing the British to arm themselves. What's the big concern in disarming us ?


We Brits just like looking down our noses at you and oppressing you, LM. That's what it's about. I hope that helps. [:)]




Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.9199219