Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment ***


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** Page: <<   < prev  7 8 [9] 10 11   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to ... - 10/4/2013 6:56:12 AM   
Zonie63


Posts: 2826
Joined: 4/25/2011
From: The Old Pueblo
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer
How many countries in the First World can you cite that have moved towards the USA's policy on gun ownership rather than (even further) away from it? In all the time I've been posting on CM I've only noticed one, just one, British poster who's liked the US freedom in regards to guns and wanted the same for the UK. (And I may add that the American gun-supporters thought this one person was a complete dickhead, IIRC.)

Seriously, K, I look at certain Americans talking about, say, armed guards in schools, or carrying weapons into church services . . . and, now, I'm honestly getting to the point of disbelief. Guns are symbols of violence and killing. How can it be psychologically, socially or ethically healthy to have young kids exposed to their presence in the very places that are supposed to give them their first lessons about how to live and what the good society is about? And guns in churches? Is anyone really surprised that a lot of people are going to find this idea utterly contradictory to something fundamental in Christianity?


Is it really the guns and what they symbolize that's at issue here? Guns do exist, as they have for centuries, whether or not society is capable of restricting their ownership and/or having them secured by competent, trustworthy people. That seems to be the core issue here, not so much what guns symbolize. The gun itself is just an object, but it's who gets to own them and control them is what is under discussion. The guns themselves will never go away. The genie left that bottle centuries ago.

Guns are a symbol of the human species, a testament to our desire to come up with clever inventions to kill each other much more effectively.

I don't know that Europeans necessarily feel "superior" to Americans, although when I speak to Europeans about America, I find that they get some things wrong about us. Many seem to already have their minds made up about America and tend to dismiss the American point of view as either "ignorant" or "crazy." It's common in political banter to reduce the opposition to the lowest common denominator, but the problem is that it creates a skewed image of things that can lead to the point of disbelief of which you speak.

I think comparisons between Europe and America are a bit old, anyway. Fact is, our historical paths have run somewhat parallel to each other, but in slightly different directions. One can argue that America has actually been more stable overall during the past 200+ years, while Europe has seen far more upheavals and conflicts than we've had here in America. That doesn't necessarily make one "superior" to the other, but our different historical experiences have given us different perspectives. Our way of doing things may be wrong for Europe, but right for us - and vice versa.



(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 161
RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to ... - 10/4/2013 7:11:27 AM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63
I don't know that Europeans necessarily feel "superior" to Americans [etc] . . . .


To me it's just asinine for one nationality to feel superior *or inferior* to another solely by virtue of the difference of nation. It makes no sense. Beyond silly jokes, that's really all I've got to say about that subject.

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to Zonie63)
Profile   Post #: 162
RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to ... - 10/4/2013 8:15:00 AM   
freedomdwarf1


Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63
quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer
How many countries in the First World can you cite that have moved towards the USA's policy on gun ownership rather than (even further) away from it? In all the time I've been posting on CM I've only noticed one, just one, British poster who's liked the US freedom in regards to guns and wanted the same for the UK. (And I may add that the American gun-supporters thought this one person was a complete dickhead, IIRC.)

Seriously, K, I look at certain Americans talking about, say, armed guards in schools, or carrying weapons into church services . . . and, now, I'm honestly getting to the point of disbelief. Guns are symbols of violence and killing. How can it be psychologically, socially or ethically healthy to have young kids exposed to their presence in the very places that are supposed to give them their first lessons about how to live and what the good society is about? And guns in churches? Is anyone really surprised that a lot of people are going to find this idea utterly contradictory to something fundamental in Christianity?


Is it really the guns and what they symbolize that's at issue here? Guns do exist, as they have for centuries, whether or not society is capable of restricting their ownership and/or having them secured by competent, trustworthy people. That seems to be the core issue here, not so much what guns symbolize.

I think a lot of the problem with the gun perspective, especially from posters who live in a relatively gun-free country, is the plain and simple fact that we see and hear on the news (almost daily) that the people who live in gun-populated countries just don't appear to be able to be "competent, trustworthy people".
There are many Brits (and Australians) that do actually own guns, as do quite a few others; but you rarely see the daily shootings and regular massacres that we see in the US.

For my own PoV, there are three main reasons for this -
1) Guns are not allowed to be carried in public places - it's illegal everywhere, not just in certain towns or counties or 'gun free' zones.
2) Virtually every gun owner goes through rigorous police and psychological health checks before any gun license is issued. Licenses are only issued for very specific guns - not a general arsenal. Apparently, this is not true for the US.
3) Because of the severe restrictions, getting hold of illegal guns is quite difficult, even for criminals. This is also why we don't have as many violent gangs per capita as there are in the US and other gun-prolific countries.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63
The gun itself is just an object, but it's who gets to own them and control them is what is under discussion. The guns themselves will never go away. The genie left that bottle centuries ago.

And there is one of the root problems with the US.
Many 1st-world countries have evolved and realised strict gun controls are necessary for general public safety. Apparently, because of the 2nd, Americans haven't evolved to that realisation (yet).


quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63
Guns are a symbol of the human species, a testament to our desire to come up with clever inventions to kill each other much more effectively.

Very true.
But not many 1st-world countries allow citizens to carry guns on public streets like the US. 

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63
I don't know that Europeans necessarily feel "superior" to Americans, although when I speak to Europeans about America, I find that they get some things wrong about us. Many seem to already have their minds made up about America and tend to dismiss the American point of view as either "ignorant" or "crazy." It's common in political banter to reduce the opposition to the lowest common denominator, but the problem is that it creates a skewed image of things that can lead to the point of disbelief of which you speak.

I don't think we are any more 'superior' or 'inferior' to the US - as a people or culture.
I think what tends to happen is that we see the stubbornness of Americans to even acknowledge that the gun culture is creating problems that quite a few countries have all-but eliminated.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63
I think comparisons between Europe and America are a bit old, anyway. Fact is, our historical paths have run somewhat parallel to each other, but in slightly different directions. One can argue that America has actually been more stable overall during the past 200+ years, while Europe has seen far more upheavals and conflicts than we've had here in America. That doesn't necessarily make one "superior" to the other, but our different historical experiences have given us different perspectives. Our way of doing things may be wrong for Europe, but right for us - and vice versa.

I quite agree with the stability thing.
But that is more to do with politics than the people or any gun culture.
But I think the current US political shambles, added to the gun problems, is beginning to show that the system over there just isn't working as it should.

(in reply to Zonie63)
Profile   Post #: 163
RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to ... - 10/4/2013 8:32:55 AM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
And guns in churches? Is anyone really surprised that a lot of people are going to find this idea utterly contradictory to something fundamental in Christianity?



What is more Christian than putting yourself in the path of danger to protect others?

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 164
RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to ... - 10/4/2013 8:42:34 AM   
freedomdwarf1


Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

And guns in churches? Is anyone really surprised that a lot of people are going to find this idea utterly contradictory to something fundamental in Christianity?



What is more Christian than putting yourself in the path of danger to protect others?

I don't see that this is a religion-based thing at all.

I just fail to see that this sort of action/reaction is just a christian thing.
You can feel the same way if you were agnostic/atheist/pagan/christian or anything else for that matter.
It's a personal PoV, not religious, and certainly has no religious overtones.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 165
RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to ... - 10/4/2013 9:07:06 AM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

And guns in churches? Is anyone really surprised that a lot of people are going to find this idea utterly contradictory to something fundamental in Christianity?



What is more Christian than putting yourself in the path of danger to protect others?

I don't see that this is a religion-based thing at all.

I just fail to see that this sort of action/reaction is just a christian thing.
You can feel the same way if you were agnostic/atheist/pagan/christian or anything else for that matter.
It's a personal PoV, not religious, and certainly has no religious overtones.


I agree but I was responding to the claim that carrying in church somehow violates Christian views. Other religions and philosophies were not part of that exchange.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 166
RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to ... - 10/4/2013 9:29:53 AM   
tj444


Posts: 7574
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

I agree but I was responding to the claim that carrying in church somehow violates Christian views. Other religions and philosophies were not part of that exchange.

McDs, Starbucks, other corps have gun policies, no guns signs, etc so why wouldn't a church/Priest also have a gun policy? Its up to the corp, or person in charge to decide this issue for their particular business/property, imo.. I dunno.. maybe God needs protecting??

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 167
RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to ... - 10/4/2013 9:45:26 AM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

I agree but I was responding to the claim that carrying in church somehow violates Christian views. Other religions and philosophies were not part of that exchange.

McDs, Starbucks, other corps have gun policies, no guns signs, etc so why wouldn't a church/Priest also have a gun policy? Its up to the corp, or person in charge to decide this issue for their particular business/property, imo.. I dunno.. maybe God needs protecting??

Duh churches have that option.
God doesn't need protecting but often his people do.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to tj444)
Profile   Post #: 168
RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to ... - 10/4/2013 10:06:35 AM   
tj444


Posts: 7574
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Duh churches have that option.
God doesn't need protecting but often his people do.

of course they do (have the option)..
but wouldn't it be God's will that allowed someone to be attacked and need protecting?

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 169
RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to ... - 10/4/2013 12:46:59 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Duh churches have that option.
God doesn't need protecting but often his people do.

of course they do (have the option)..
but wouldn't it be God's will that allowed someone to be attacked and need protecting?

And you know that He wouldn't protect them by allowing the right person with a firearm be in the way.
Clearly you are ignoring the concept that freewill allows people to commit evil acts.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to tj444)
Profile   Post #: 170
RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to ... - 10/4/2013 12:50:31 PM   
Nosathro


Posts: 3319
Joined: 9/25/2005
From: Orange County, California
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Duh churches have that option.
God doesn't need protecting but often his people do.

of course they do (have the option)..
but wouldn't it be God's will that allowed someone to be attacked and need protecting?

And you know that He wouldn't protect them by allowing the right person with a firearm be in the way.
Clearly you are ignoring the concept that freewill allows people to commit evil acts.


Free will you mean like the Inquisition? The Witch Trials? And how many other killings done in Gods Name, by good Christians.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 171
RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to ... - 10/4/2013 12:58:11 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Duh churches have that option.
God doesn't need protecting but often his people do.

of course they do (have the option)..
but wouldn't it be God's will that allowed someone to be attacked and need protecting?

And you know that He wouldn't protect them by allowing the right person with a firearm be in the way.
Clearly you are ignoring the concept that freewill allows people to commit evil acts.


Free will you mean like the Inquisition? The Witch Trials? And how many other killings done in Gods Name, by good Christians.

So now you claim Godlike ability to see into the hearts of men to rule on who is and is not a good Christian?
I have never heard or read, except from you, that the inquisition or the witch hunts were conducted by good Christians.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to Nosathro)
Profile   Post #: 172
RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to ... - 10/4/2013 3:46:28 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
FR did politesub ever show here

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 173
RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to ... - 10/5/2013 6:36:08 AM   
Zonie63


Posts: 2826
Joined: 4/25/2011
From: The Old Pueblo
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63
I don't know that Europeans necessarily feel "superior" to Americans [etc] . . . .


To me it's just asinine for one nationality to feel superior *or inferior* to another solely by virtue of the difference of nation. It makes no sense. Beyond silly jokes, that's really all I've got to say about that subject.


I don't think it's over the difference of nation, per se, but over different ways of doing things.

Beyond silly jokes, though, if someone truly has a righteous grievance against America or somehow believes that America has harmed them personally or their nation, then I for one would like to know what it is. After all, I'm an American and the honor and reputation of my country is important to me. If my government does something in my name which is harmful to others, then that's something I would take seriously, not as a silly joke.

Likewise, if there are those who have constructive criticisms of America and believe they know ways to improve the quality of life for Americans, then I'd be interested in hearing that, too.

All I would ask is that if someone does express a grievance against America or criticizes our country, that they at least be fair and open-minded enough to listen to our side and our perspective on things. The trouble is, I just don't see that coming from our European cousins. It seems like they believe like they have us all figured out and don't even want to hear our side.


(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 174
RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to ... - 10/5/2013 10:50:31 AM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63
All I would ask is that if someone does express a grievance against America or criticizes our country, that they at least be fair and open-minded enough to listen to our side and our perspective on things. The trouble is, I just don't see that coming from our European cousins. It seems like they believe like they have us all figured out and don't even want to hear our side.


Just to be crystal clear: I haven't 'criticised the USA' or 'expressed a grievance against the USA' here, Zonie. What I've done is said that I find an *aspect* of American culture disgusting. There are aspects of British culture that I find disgusting, too - but few would consider that to be a sign of my 'anti-Britishness'. Instead, they'd probably think, 'Ah, well, he's a lefty. He's bound to criticise his own country'. And they'd be right.

When American gun-fans try to turn my views about attitudes to guns in the USA into an attack on American culture as a whole, coupled with some old drivel about Europeans' alleged feelings of superiority towards Americans, most of the time I see that as a implausible, as well as somewhat pathetic, attempt to cry victim and thereby evade the argument.



_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to Zonie63)
Profile   Post #: 175
RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to ... - 10/5/2013 11:06:07 AM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63
All I would ask is that if someone does express a grievance against America or criticizes our country, that they at least be fair and open-minded enough to listen to our side and our perspective on things. The trouble is, I just don't see that coming from our European cousins. It seems like they believe like they have us all figured out and don't even want to hear our side.


Just to be crystal clear: I haven't 'criticised the USA' or 'expressed a grievance against the USA' here, Zonie. What I've done is said that I find an *aspect* of American culture disgusting. There are aspects of British culture that I find disgusting, too - but few would consider that to be a sign of my 'anti-Britishness'. Instead, they'd probably think, 'Ah, well, he's a lefty. He's bound to criticise his own country'. And they'd be right.

When American gun-fans try to turn my views about attitudes to guns in the USA into an attack on American culture as a whole, coupled with some old drivel about Europeans' alleged feelings of superiority towards Americans, most of the time I see that as a implausible, as well as somewhat pathetic, attempt to cry victim and thereby evade the argument.



No we see disgusting and perverted as resorting to name calling rather than honest debate

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 176
RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to ... - 10/5/2013 11:19:09 AM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
No we see disgusting and perverted as resorting to name calling rather than honest debate


Who's this 'we'?. You're not *still* trying to make this about the USA as a whole, are you?

And I was expressing how I felt about a particular aspect of American culture. You can take that or leave it - but don't ask me to pretend to like it just to save the sensitivities of a certain group of Americans.


_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 177
RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to ... - 10/5/2013 11:57:50 AM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

FR did politesub ever show here


I just thought I would point out Chi`s OP about not taking this thread off topic.





(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 178
RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to ... - 10/5/2013 12:04:54 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

FR did politesub ever show here


I just thought I would point out Chi`s OP about not taking this thread off topic.






On the other hand here I am free to point out that you are a reprehensible excuse for a human being with the analytical skills of my dog and a level of arrogance virtually unparalleled and totally unjustified.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 179
RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to ... - 10/5/2013 12:09:49 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

FR did politesub ever show here


I just thought I would point out Chi`s OP about not taking this thread off topic.






If you care so much about thread drift why do you always engage in it?
Oh yes that is right you have to find something that lets you feel superior.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 180
Page:   <<   < prev  7 8 [9] 10 11   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: ***Unmoderated Gun rights debate - Self Defense to 2nd Amendment *** Page: <<   < prev  7 8 [9] 10 11   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109