quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

Nonsense. The ipcc advanced a model of climate warming that said "green house gases are the cause and if so we continue temperatures will be y."

quote:

The burden of proof is not on deniers to prove an alternate theory.

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

So stated by the person that does not hold an accredited degree in any real science at a B.S., M.S. or Ph.D. level. Nor has actually spent a considerable amount of time understanding what constitutes 'legitimate' work and falsified information. An individual who feels the whole of this concept is a 'Democratic Push' or some sort of conspiracy driven attack to undermine said person's mystical freedoms. And that this same individual on previous threads has been destroyed by counter argument and counter evidence that show their position was no where near 'stable' or 'factual'. Bottom line, this person has no credibility and can be....IGNORED.

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

Nonsense. The ipcc advanced a model of climate warming that said "green house gases are the cause and if so we continue temperatures will be y."

And temperatures are in the range predicted. I guess that ends that bullshit.

quote:

The burden of proof is not on deniers to prove an alternate theory.

WRONG!!!!!!!

The data supports the theory of AGW so in order for the deniers to show the theory is wrong there must be some data in support of the contrary claim and there isn't.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

Nonsense. The ipcc advanced a model of climate warming that said "green house gases are the cause and if so we continue temperatures will be y."

And temperatures are in the range predicted. I guess that ends that bullshit.

quote:

The burden of proof is not on deniers to prove an alternate theory.

WRONG!!!!!!!

The data supports the theory of AGW so in order for the deniers to show the theory is wrong there must be some data in support of the contrary claim and there isn't.

Saying the data supports it - time and time and time again doesn't make it true.

We are at +1.2. The lowest IPCC model had us over 2. We are at almost half of the temperature the IPCC said we'd be at.
The temperatures don't support the models.