RE: More climate change news

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: More climate change news

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: More climate change news

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: More climate change news - 9/28/2013 7:14:21 PM

DomKen

Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

Nonsense. The ipcc advanced a model of climate warming that said "green house gases are the cause and if so we continue temperatures will be y."

And temperatures are in the range predicted. I guess that ends that bullshit.

quote:

The burden of proof is not on deniers to prove an alternate theory.

WRONG!!!!!!!

The data supports the theory of AGW so in order for the deniers to show the theory is wrong there must be some data in support of the contrary claim and there isn't.

< Message edited by DomKen -- 9/28/2013 7:15:01 PM >

(in reply to Phydeaux)

Profile

Post #: 21

RE: More climate change news - 9/28/2013 7:24:47 PM

VideoAdminGamma

Posts: 2233
Status: offline

Please do not make other posters the subject of your post. Attack the post and not the posters.

Thanks for being a part of CollarMe,
Gamma

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

So stated by the person that does not hold an accredited degree in any real science at a B.S., M.S. or Ph.D. level. Nor has actually spent a considerable amount of time understanding what constitutes 'legitimate' work and falsified information. An individual who feels the whole of this concept is a 'Democratic Push' or some sort of conspiracy driven attack to undermine said person's mystical freedoms. And that this same individual on previous threads has been destroyed by counter argument and counter evidence that show their position was no where near 'stable' or 'factual'. Bottom line, this person has no credibility and can be....IGNORED.

_____________________________

"The administration has the authority to handle situations in whatever manner they feel to be in the best interests of the forum, at that moment, in response to that event. "

http://www.collarchat.com/m_72/tm.htm

(in reply to joether)

Profile

Post #: 22

RE: More climate change news - 9/28/2013 7:47:41 PM

Phydeaux

Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

Nonsense. The ipcc advanced a model of climate warming that said "green house gases are the cause and if so we continue temperatures will be y."

And temperatures are in the range predicted. I guess that ends that bullshit.

quote:

The burden of proof is not on deniers to prove an alternate theory.

WRONG!!!!!!!

The data supports the theory of AGW so in order for the deniers to show the theory is wrong there must be some data in support of the contrary claim and there isn't.

Saying the data supports it - time and time and time again doesn't make it true.

We are at +1.2. The lowest IPCC model had us over 2. We are at almost half of the temperature the IPCC said we'd be at.
The temperatures don't support the models.

(in reply to DomKen)

Profile

Post #: 23

RE: More climate change news - 9/28/2013 8:26:56 PM

DomKen

Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

Nonsense. The ipcc advanced a model of climate warming that said "green house gases are the cause and if so we continue temperatures will be y."

And temperatures are in the range predicted. I guess that ends that bullshit.

quote:

The burden of proof is not on deniers to prove an alternate theory.

WRONG!!!!!!!

The data supports the theory of AGW so in order for the deniers to show the theory is wrong there must be some data in support of the contrary claim and there isn't.

Saying the data supports it - time and time and time again doesn't make it true.

We are at +1.2. The lowest IPCC model had us over 2. We are at almost half of the temperature the IPCC said we'd be at.
The temperatures don't support the models.

WRONG AGAIN!!!!!!!!!

The IPCC models predict temperatures no where near +2C now.
http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/spmsspm-projections-of.html

(in reply to Phydeaux)

Profile

Post #: 24