RedMagic1 -> RE: consensual "blackmail" ... (9/28/2013 3:48:35 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: AliceInUndieLand Thanks for everyone's input so far.. really appreciate it ... I would strongly disagree about being "unrealistic" ... - All BDSM arrangements - and I'm talking about commercial session based play operate within fairly tightly agreed guidelines... and are of course based on trust ... It's definitely realistic. That said, it's possible for a woman to "get" it, and still not want it. Consider a previously rare fetish that is now all over CM profiles: forced intox. This used to be considered TOTALLY INSANE, something done only by fraternity pledges and out-of-control gay leathermen. But there's no doubt it's approaching mainstream now, at least in cyber. Why? I don't know for certain, but I believe it is because a drunk man is more likely to tribute more money than a sober man. How much you would trust such a woman to hold your future in the palm of her hand? I think you'll find that the prodommes who offer forced intox are also the ones more likely to be interested in blackmail arrangements. Probably for similar reasons. This doesn't mean you should take them up on it, though. Whether you want it to be true or not, what you're describing is edge play, both with respect to the LAW, and also with respect to the possibilities of unintentionally passing hard limits of emotional masochism and financial ruination. My advice is that you should only enter into this agreement with a woman who has a lot to lose. She'll be a lot less likely to destroy you in the bad way, if she could be destroyed herself.
|
|
|
|