RE: Cavuto has a good monologue on Obamacare (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


DsBound -> RE: Cavuto has a good monologue on Obamacare (9/30/2013 11:50:38 AM)

If you think for a moment the whitehouse is going to willing give stats that could go against their will, youre wrong.
I have to give it to them... they have worked wonders teaching blind obedience.




mnottertail -> RE: Cavuto has a good monologue on Obamacare (9/30/2013 11:53:32 AM)

Oh? There are whitehouse stats on this thread? I wasn't aware. Mayhaps you are mistaken. I have seen stats, not from the whitehouse. But the teabaggers are definitely doing the blind obedience thing, you are right about that.




DsBound -> RE: Cavuto has a good monologue on Obamacare (9/30/2013 12:02:32 PM)

For the sake of the people, the sake of small business owners... I hope its all BS. However, brushing everything off to coincidence or teabaggers or nut jobs is dangerous and only shows how "open minded" the loyalists are when it comes to BO. I just dont understand blindly worshipping any givernment (left or right) with the notion they are going to do whats best for the people. They will do whatever is best for their agenda and pocketbook... we the people are a simple commodity to them.





DsBound -> RE: Cavuto has a good monologue on Obamacare (9/30/2013 12:03:48 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Oh? There are whitehouse stats on this thread? I wasn't aware. Mayhaps you are mistaken. I have seen stats, not from the whitehouse. But the teabaggers are definitely doing the blind obedience thing, you are right about that.


Really? Im not a tea party person, nor a republican... [;)]




Phydeaux -> RE: Cavuto has a good monologue on Obamacare (9/30/2013 12:09:04 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DsBound

For the sake of the people, the sake of small business owners... I hope its all BS. However, brushing everything off to coincidence or teabaggers or nut jobs is dangerous and only shows how "open minded" the loyalists are when it comes to BO. I just dont understand blindly worshipping any givernment (left or right) with the notion they are going to do whats best for the people. They will do whatever is best for their agenda and pocketbook... we the people are a simple commodity to them.




I happen to speak regularly with a guy that owns 10 fuddruckers. Since each franchis employs less than 50 you'd think he'd be immune to obamacare. however, a small business owner is required to provide insurance if the aggregate workers are more than 50. So, like small business owners everwhere he is cutting hours. Where as each restaurant had half a dozen full time employees - they now have 4. Everyone else has been moved to part time.

Thanks Obamacare!




DsBound -> RE: Cavuto has a good monologue on Obamacare (9/30/2013 12:14:25 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: DsBound

For the sake of the people, the sake of small business owners... I hope its all BS. However, brushing everything off to coincidence or teabaggers or nut jobs is dangerous and only shows how "open minded" the loyalists are when it comes to BO. I just dont understand blindly worshipping any givernment (left or right) with the notion they are going to do whats best for the people. They will do whatever is best for their agenda and pocketbook... we the people are a simple commodity to them.




I happen to speak regularly with a guy that owns 10 fuddruckers. Since each franchis employs less than 50 you'd think he'd be immune to obamacare. however, a small business owner is required to provide insurance if the aggregate workers are more than 50. So, like small business owners everwhere he is cutting hours. Where as each restaurant had half a dozen full time employees - they now have 4. Everyone else has been moved to part time.

Thanks Obamacare!


Oh come now... Im sure he was planning those cuts anyway![;)]




mnottertail -> RE: Cavuto has a good monologue on Obamacare (9/30/2013 12:16:10 PM)

Wow, so the low paying jobs are not hiring now. Shit, what else do we have than low paying jobs, guess they go medicaid or on the market, if they want to keep the low paying job.




Hillwilliam -> RE: Cavuto has a good monologue on Obamacare (9/30/2013 1:39:05 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
Defunding Obamacare is the first step in getting it repealed. Do you have citations showing that the employers citing Obamacare as the reason for their hiring/firing decisions are only scapegoating Obamacare?

I disagree. Presenting the American public with a workable, superior alternative is the best way to get it repealed.
What have they come up with that is a better idea?
Bueller? Bueller? Anyone?

There was a bill that was being brought forward. Not sure if it ever made it to committee, out of committee, etc. I linked to it and it was widely decried by the usual suspects.
Obamacare was run through for exactly the reason MN gloats about: "Since that [repeal] aint gonna happen, perhaps if one were to fix any of its problem areas in the law................ "
The whole idea of getting it passed and in place was because it would be so much more of a bitch to get back out once it was in place. And, it was heavily front loaded with sops to get people hooked on it's good parts before the bad parts took place. It was strategically written and executed. That ["strategery"] is one of Obama's greatest talents, and he is damn good at it.

The Republicans have the majority in the house and they couldn't get a bill out of committee?
They're GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOd[8|]


It was introduced and sent to committee on 18 Sep 2013. Shit takes time.


Once again. 4 years ago, they found out they were going to get hit with Obamacare. it took them until 2 weeks ago to send an alternative bill to committee?

Damn, they're GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOD




DesideriScuri -> RE: Cavuto has a good monologue on Obamacare (9/30/2013 2:36:31 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
Defunding Obamacare is the first step in getting it repealed. Do you have citations showing that the employers citing Obamacare as the reason for their hiring/firing decisions are only scapegoating Obamacare?

I disagree. Presenting the American public with a workable, superior alternative is the best way to get it repealed.
What have they come up with that is a better idea?
Bueller? Bueller? Anyone?

There was a bill that was being brought forward. Not sure if it ever made it to committee, out of committee, etc. I linked to it and it was widely decried by the usual suspects.
Obamacare was run through for exactly the reason MN gloats about: "Since that [repeal] aint gonna happen, perhaps if one were to fix any of its problem areas in the law................ "
The whole idea of getting it passed and in place was because it would be so much more of a bitch to get back out once it was in place. And, it was heavily front loaded with sops to get people hooked on it's good parts before the bad parts took place. It was strategically written and executed. That ["strategery"] is one of Obama's greatest talents, and he is damn good at it.

The Republicans have the majority in the house and they couldn't get a bill out of committee?
They're GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOd[8|]

It was introduced and sent to committee on 18 Sep 2013. Shit takes time.

Once again. 4 years ago, they found out they were going to get hit with Obamacare. it took them until 2 weeks ago to send an alternative bill to committee?
Damn, they're GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOD


4 years ago was... 2009.

Speaker of the House and House dominance was? Nancy Pelosi and her fellow Republicans Democrats.

John Boehner took office in January 2011. While that only excuses 1 full year, to say that the GOP has been ignoring Health Care Reform is wrong.

Republicans brought amendments to Obamacare. Some were discussed. I can only assume some were voted on with the votes split down party lines (most likely just to thumb their noses at the GOP since the Democrats had large majorities in both chambers). Full repeal is better than attempting to fix a 1,000+ page bill.




mnottertail -> RE: Cavuto has a good monologue on Obamacare (9/30/2013 2:40:38 PM)

What amendments have been brought to Obamacare? I am aware of a couple of dogshit bills under the guise of 'tort reform'. And 42 attempts at repeal, is no child left behind repealed, the entire military repealed? Too big to fix?

Simpe fix, single payer national healthcare and Obamacare goes away, just like that.




papassion -> RE: Cavuto has a good monologue on Obamacare (9/30/2013 2:56:14 PM)

If the Republicans would send the mess back to the Senate agreeing to fund Obamacare, IF they eliminate all the exemptions, special deals, etc the government gave, and say the SAME rules that apply to the big guys that got exemptions also apply to the middle class, Obama would look like a total asshole vetoing that deal. Especially after how he preaches how the middle class and "little guy" don't get a fair shake!




Phydeaux -> RE: Cavuto has a good monologue on Obamacare (9/30/2013 3:06:42 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: papassion

If the Republicans would send the mess back to the Senate agreeing to fund Obamacare, IF they eliminate all the exemptions, special deals, etc the government gave, and say the SAME rules that apply to the big guys that got exemptions also apply to the middle class, Obama would look like a total asshole vetoing that deal. Especially after how he preaches how the middle class and "little guy" don't get a fair shake!


Thats actually pretty interesting politics papassion. Remove the ability of the administration to approve waivers. Make all branches of government susceptible to it - then see if the senate passes it - and the president signs it.

Ideally, this is something that republicans in the senate could put as an amendment. The senate is the right venue - put pressure on the democrats to pass it, as a compromise.




joether -> RE: Cavuto has a good monologue on Obamacare (9/30/2013 3:38:19 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
Defunding Obamacare is the first step in getting it repealed.


No its not. Do you really understand what defunding the Affordable Care Act would do to the law? From a non-economical level.....nothing. Tomorrow, the health care exchanges open across the nation. On Jan. 1, 2014 additional effects take place. This is all explained in the law; go read it!

From an economical level it does a HUGE amount of damage to ordinary citizens. Part of the funding reduces the cost of the bronze and silver plans so that person A in Boston, MA pays about the same as Person B in Jericho, KS. Use This Calculator. This explains the results based on information inputted to arrive at the most likely cost. It includes valuable information in determining costs of private plans that enter the market now or in the future. The final calculation is what is important here:

"You could receive a government tax credit subsidy of up to:"

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts is 'all one unit' since we have Mass Health. In the other states & D.C., you need to enter in a zip code. I have the belief (and not verified with information at the moment) that the government hired some intelligent mathematicians and economists to determine the 'cost' level of someone at each different age level, complications of health and whether they are paying for just themselves or other family members as well.

I did an example using the following for Massachusetts: single person, age 40, no tobacco use, employer doesn't pay insurance, i.e. a small business owner. I found it would cost $2,718/year (or $226/month). I'm considered 305% above the poverty level. Now consider the same criteria, BUT, I'm the breadwinner of the family of four. The amount it would cost me is $776/year (or $64/month) and I'm 149% above the poverty level.. This is for a Bronze Plan.

For a Silver Plan it would cost a single person $6,350/year (or $529/month), and (breadwinner of four) $2,250/year (or $187/month). Play with the calculator. Use different states and zip codes for large cities or areas without a city.

Now, to answer the rest of your question. What happens if the Affordable Care Act is defunded as Republicans/Tea Party and their conservatives demand?

"Amount you pay for the premium:"

This is what it costs without the Affordable Care Act funding. You WILL pay this amount because that is the law! Republicans wanted to defund it, force Americans to pay the high level a year, and go absolutely ballistic in the 2014 and 2016 elections. They LIED to push their own political agenda this whole time, and without care for ordinary America's well being. Because when Americans sit down and do the calculations, the health care law actually benefits them in many, many ways. The Affordable Care Act is not a perfect system, DS. I can agree with you on that. But its a far better system than what most Americans suffer through right now. A well informed public will make good decisions on problems of the day. A misinformed public will made bad decisions.

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
Do you have citations showing that the employers citing Obamacare as the reason for their hiring/firing decisions are only scapegoating Obamacare?


Do I need to present citations that there exists numerous, unscrupulous business owners in America? There have been plenty of examples of unscrupulous businesses doing unethical and/or illegal stuff for profit (how did we get into the recession that Pres. Obama inherited, DS?). An who gave final approval for those business decisions that were unethical and/or illegal? The business owners! I'll present the 10 tons of examples of 'numerous, unscrupulous business owners' after you present citation that all 100% of business organizations in the United States of America are 100% ethical and legal in ALL their business dealings with employees and/or the public for the last twenty years from the 2013 mark.




Phydeaux -> RE: Cavuto has a good monologue on Obamacare (9/30/2013 3:46:59 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
Defunding Obamacare is the first step in getting it repealed.


No its not. Do you really understand what defunding the Affordable Care Act would do to the law? From a non-economical level.....nothing.



Claptrap.

First don't know what the implications are, since the immplications will depend on the bill passed.
However, if the house fails to fund IRS agents to administer the tax, or salaries for panels to impliment the law - the implications go way beyond the subsidies you talk about.

Since the law was passed on a budget it can also be repealed on a budget, which would be far cleaner than defunding.




joether -> RE: Cavuto has a good monologue on Obamacare (9/30/2013 4:21:09 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
Defunding Obamacare is the first step in getting it repealed.

No its not. Do you really understand what defunding the Affordable Care Act would do to the law? From a non-economical level.....nothing.

Claptrap.


What does an annoying unicycle robot from the Borderlands universe have to do with the Affordable Care Act?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux
First don't know what the implications are, since the immplications will depend on the bill passed.
However, if the house fails to fund IRS agents to administer the tax, or salaries for panels to impliment the law - the implications go way beyond the subsidies you talk about.


Your first sentence explains why your second sentence doesn't work: you don't understand the bill. Understanding the bill would implied you READ THE BILL. Its been around for three years, on numerous sites and easy to find with just a goggle search: Affordable Car Act text. The PDF form is about 967 pages long. However, if you minus out the intro, executive summary, table of contents, definitions used, and laws that might or might not be tied to the ACA, along with the graphics and appendix at the back; the whole thing is about 650 pages. Then, single space the remaining document and its about 280-340 pages. That's the typical size of a good science fiction novel these days. My current novel is only 360 pages and I'll be through it in about a week. I'll agree that the ACA is a bit of a .....dull....read; but unlike my novel, the ACA has very important concepts regarding my financial, economic and health future.

Unless of course you feel Imperial Space Marines from the Iron Fist Chapter crushing the evil forces of Chaos who are trying to steal a planet from the Emperor of Mankind 37,987 years in the future more important....

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux
Since the law was passed on a budget it can also be repealed on a budget, which would be far cleaner than defunding.


An defunding the bill would force you to pay MORE in health care costs each year. Go to THIS SITE and enter all the information in the fields provided and hit the 'submit' button in blue. Than scroll down to the following section:

Amount you pay for the premium:

The amount listed for this line is how much YOU WILL PAY under the current law (if its 100% defunded). So your demanding that Republicans defund the ACA and thus force you to pay much more than what you would have been paying if the ACA was kept funded. You want the poor and middle class to pay this amount to advice some political viewpoint you have. How about I give you the middle finger and tell you to 'go to hell'. The poor and middle class need to have access to health care without it forcing them into bankruptcy. I do not see the Republicans (or more some the Tea Party) presenting a single plan that is better than the ACA.




Yachtie -> RE: Cavuto has a good monologue on Obamacare (9/30/2013 5:12:32 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

What does it mean? What do the teabaggers say about their ineptitude and their uselesness? Where is that in the Weekly Standard?

Junk is fucking junk. If you have no credible citations, you have no credible citations.


I think a few here might appreciate this. [:D]





DesideriScuri -> RE: Cavuto has a good monologue on Obamacare (9/30/2013 5:15:19 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
Defunding Obamacare is the first step in getting it repealed.

No its not. Do you really understand what defunding the Affordable Care Act would do to the law? From a non-economical level.....nothing. Tomorrow, the health care exchanges open across the nation. On Jan. 1, 2014 additional effects take place. This is all explained in the law; go read it!
From an economical level it does a HUGE amount of damage to ordinary citizens. Part of the funding reduces the cost of the bronze and silver plans so that person A in Boston, MA pays about the same as Person B in Jericho, KS. Use This Calculator. This explains the results based on information inputted to arrive at the most likely cost. It includes valuable information in determining costs of private plans that enter the market now or in the future. The final calculation is what is important here:


Sorry, you lost on that one. MN already has shown that KFF isn't a credible source of information regarding Obamacare. [:D]

quote:

They LIED to push their own political agenda this whole time, and without care for ordinary America's well being. Because when Americans sit down and do the calculations, the health care law actually benefits them in many, many ways. The Affordable Care Act is not a perfect system, DS. I can agree with you on that. But its a far better system than what most Americans suffer through right now. A well informed public will make good decisions on problems of the day. A misinformed public will made bad decisions.


Who lied? The "this is not a tax" crowd? The crowd that denied it was a tax so the American public wouldn't lynch them? Oh, sorry. My bad. It was the GOP that lied. [8|]

quote:

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
Do you have citations showing that the employers citing Obamacare as the reason for their hiring/firing decisions are only scapegoating Obamacare?

Do I need to present citations that there exists numerous, unscrupulous business owners in America? There have been plenty of examples of unscrupulous businesses doing unethical and/or illegal stuff for profit (how did we get into the recession that Pres. Obama inherited, DS?). An who gave final approval for those business decisions that were unethical and/or illegal? The business owners! I'll present the 10 tons of examples of 'numerous, unscrupulous business owners' after you present citation that all 100% of business organizations in the United States of America are 100% ethical and legal in ALL their business dealings with employees and/or the public for the last twenty years from the 2013 mark.


IOW, no, you have no proof.

According to the Congressional Investigation into the causes of the recession, who acted unscrupulously? Was it the Federal Reserve who's duties include supervising so shit like that doesn't happen? Why, yes. Yes it was. Was it the Federal regulators who were too busy looking up porn to do their jobs? Why, yes. Yes it was. Was there too much regulation on Fannie and Freddie? No, oddly enough. No there wasn't, even though there was a high-ranking GOP member asking Congress to do just that.

Who were the unscrupulous people that inflated bubbles, kept interest rates ridiculously low and allowed all sorts of bad investments to underpin our economy? Oh, that's right; the Federal Government. Yeah, forgive me if I resist handing over even more responsibility to a group that couldn't even do their jobs right before.




DomKen -> RE: Cavuto has a good monologue on Obamacare (9/30/2013 5:33:19 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
Defunding Obamacare is the first step in getting it repealed. Do you have citations showing that the employers citing Obamacare as the reason for their hiring/firing decisions are only scapegoating Obamacare?

I disagree. Presenting the American public with a workable, superior alternative is the best way to get it repealed.
What have they come up with that is a better idea?
Bueller? Bueller? Anyone?

There was a bill that was being brought forward. Not sure if it ever made it to committee, out of committee, etc. I linked to it and it was widely decried by the usual suspects.
Obamacare was run through for exactly the reason MN gloats about: "Since that [repeal] aint gonna happen, perhaps if one were to fix any of its problem areas in the law................ "
The whole idea of getting it passed and in place was because it would be so much more of a bitch to get back out once it was in place. And, it was heavily front loaded with sops to get people hooked on it's good parts before the bad parts took place. It was strategically written and executed. That ["strategery"] is one of Obama's greatest talents, and he is damn good at it.

The Republicans have the majority in the house and they couldn't get a bill out of committee?
They're GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOd[8|]


It was introduced and sent to committee on 18 Sep 2013. Shit takes time.


link to the bill?




Phydeaux -> RE: Cavuto has a good monologue on Obamacare (9/30/2013 10:59:17 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
Defunding Obamacare is the first step in getting it repealed.

No its not. Do you really understand what defunding the Affordable Care Act would do to the law? From a non-economical level.....nothing.

Claptrap.


What does an annoying unicycle robot from the Borderlands universe have to do with the Affordable Care Act?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux
First don't know what the implications are, since the immplications will depend on the bill passed.
However, if the house fails to fund IRS agents to administer the tax, or salaries for panels to impliment the law - the implications go way beyond the subsidies you talk about.


Your first sentence explains why your second sentence doesn't work: you don't understand the bill. Understanding the bill would implied you READ THE BILL. Its been around for three years, on numerous sites and easy to find with just a goggle search: Affordable Car Act text. The PDF form is about 967 pages long. However, if you minus out the intro, executive summary, table of contents, definitions used, and laws that might or might not be tied to the ACA, along with the graphics and appendix at the back; the whole thing is about 650 pages. Then, single space the remaining document and its about 280-340 pages. That's the typical size of a good science fiction novel these days. My current novel is only 360 pages and I'll be through it in about a week. I'll agree that the ACA is a bit of a .....dull....read; but unlike my novel, the ACA has very important concepts regarding my financial, economic and health future.

Unless of course you feel Imperial Space Marines from the Iron Fist Chapter crushing the evil forces of Chaos who are trying to steal a planet from the Emperor of Mankind 37,987 years in the future more important....

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux
Since the law was passed on a budget it can also be repealed on a budget, which would be far cleaner than defunding.


An defunding the bill would force you to pay MORE in health care costs each year. Go to THIS SITE and enter all the information in the fields provided and hit the 'submit' button in blue. Than scroll down to the following section:

Amount you pay for the premium:

The amount listed for this line is how much YOU WILL PAY under the current law (if its 100% defunded). So your demanding that Republicans defund the ACA and thus force you to pay much more than what you would have been paying if the ACA was kept funded. You want the poor and middle class to pay this amount to advice some political viewpoint you have. How about I give you the middle finger and tell you to 'go to hell'. The poor and middle class need to have access to health care without it forcing them into bankruptcy. I do not see the Republicans (or more some the Tea Party) presenting a single plan that is better than the ACA.


No. My maximum exposure this year for obama crap is $95 dollars. And it doesn't change one iota if the bill gets funded or doesn't.

You want plans that are better than the ACA?
Why ? you won't agree anyway.

What is better than the ACA:
Lets see. Mitch Daniels indiana plan.
Nothing (ie, what we had before)
The repeal of Emtala.
Hell - the govt giving everyone cash just like AFDC accounts would be better than this.
Better? allow insurance companies to work across state lines.
Better? Standardize things across all state lines for conforming plans. Have some real options - have a real catastrophic plan.

Better? Don't try to force people to undertake coverage that is in opposition to their religious beliefs.

So there you go- 7 things that would be better.





DesideriScuri -> RE: Cavuto has a good monologue on Obamacare (10/1/2013 6:03:32 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
link to the bill?


Sorry. Forgot.

American Health Care Reform Act of 2013




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625