DesideriScuri -> RE: Enough! (10/6/2013 6:24:33 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Yachtie Here it is. It's not near as effective as we've been told. Matter of fact, it's even perhaps zero effective. The Obama administration’s credibility on intelligence suffered another blow Wednesday as the chief of the National Security Agency admitted that officials put out numbers that vastly overstated the counterterrorism successes of the government’s warrantless bulk collection of all Americans’ phone records. Pressed by the Democratic chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee at an oversight hearing, Gen. Keith B. Alexander admitted that the number of terrorist plots foiled by the NSA’s huge database of every phone call made in or to America was only one or perhaps two — far smaller than the 54 originally claimed by the administration. Gen. Alexander and other intelligence chiefs have pleaded with lawmakers not to shut down the bulk collection of U.S. phone records despite growing unease about government overreach in the program, which was revealed in documents leaked by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden. “There is no evidence that [bulk] phone records collection helped to thwart dozens or even several terrorist plots,” Sen. Patrick J. Leahy, Vermont Democrat and committee chairman, told Gen. Alexander of the 54 cases that administration officials — including the general himself — have cited as the fruit of the NSA’s domestic snooping. “These weren’t all plots and they weren’t all foiled,” he said. Mr. Leahy, who has been a chief critic of the NSA, asked Gen. Alexander to admit that only 13 of the 54 cases had any connection at all to the U.S., “Would you agree with that, yes or no?” “Yes,” Gen. Alexander replied in a departure from normal practice. Why so many will still demand, believing it enhances their safety, such spying on Americans I can only attribute to some psychosis of fear. "Director of National IntelligenceJames R. Clapper denied that the number of plots foiled should be the sole metric by which the success of the program is measured. “I think there’s another metric here that’s very important. … I would call it the ‘peace of mind’ metric.” People should be indicted. You lie to federal investigators, you go to jail. Officials who lie to the American people and members of Congress, and even to Obama, get a pass. The military industrial complex needs to be torn asunder. The problem with indicting someone and sending someone to jail is the whole "proof" thing. Someone reporting to Obama would be indicted and the story will be that Obama himself didn't know what was going on, so he wasn't "lying." So, how far up would the indictments go, and how many will end up going to jail? FYI, I only mentioned Obama because he is in office and this is happening under his Administration. I hold no reservations in my belief that if the President was a Republican that this would play out in exactly the same fashion.
|
|
|
|