RE: Amber Alert v Michelle (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


DsBound -> RE: Amber Alert v Michelle (10/7/2013 9:21:30 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

The teabaggers have a corner on saying the dumb shit.


So what does that mean... that libs have the rest of the room?? Lol




Yachtie -> RE: Amber Alert v Michelle (10/7/2013 9:22:49 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DsBound


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

The teabaggers have a corner on saying the dumb shit.


So what does that mean... that libs have the rest of the room?? Lol



It's a BIG tent [;)]




mnottertail -> RE: Amber Alert v Michelle (10/7/2013 9:22:52 AM)

It is not online here.




DsBound -> RE: Amber Alert v Michelle (10/7/2013 9:27:54 AM)

Youre funny mnott... Tea Party (taxed enough already) has been around since what, 2009?? But youre right im sure its ALL their fault. [;)]




mnottertail -> RE: Amber Alert v Michelle (10/7/2013 9:53:08 AM)

Who is talking about the Tea Party, I am talking about teabaggers, there is no Tea Party guy or gal in the house or senate.

Show me like: Rep. Wanda Fuckwit (T-Arizona).

Whatever you want to call those same fools before that stretches back to Nixon and St. Wrinklemeat.





Owner59 -> RE: Amber Alert v Michelle (10/7/2013 10:11:37 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

And the site is not down.

http://www.amberalert.gov/

The story is a fake one from the beck`s lunatic fringe site, as is the link.

The op was duped ....

No, you're just out of touch. It was down. NBC carried the story, along with a screenshot of the page.
[image]local://upfiles/235229/CA641B2796AF4E3EB67C1F733B73BBD2.jpg[/image]

The site only just came back online this morning.

K.


I`m talking about the UM vs Michele story/spin....which is what duped the brain dead in your party.

What you and the OP posted was a dead OJP page. Zero proof it ever linked to Amber alert.

Again for the willfully ignorant and dishonest, Amber Alert was NEVER down

Glad to see you defend them and that garbage.....[8|]




DomKen -> RE: Amber Alert v Michelle (10/7/2013 10:21:18 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: RacerJim

The gall...the absolute unmitigated gall...Federal Amber Alert site shut down but Moochelle's site not.

Same applies to the WWII Memorial "Rainbow Pool" fountains and "Reflection Wall" waterfalls being shut down but not the White House fountain.

Washington DC parking enforcement wasn't shut down last Saturday either...at least not around the WWII & Korean & Vietnam Memorials.

There is no parking on the Mall, it is a large park. Why exactly do you keep making shit up?




mnottertail -> RE: Amber Alert v Michelle (10/7/2013 10:23:37 AM)

that would mitigate some gall.




Kirata -> RE: Amber Alert v Michelle (10/7/2013 10:47:22 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

I`m talking about the UM vs Michele story/spin....which is what duped the brain dead in your party.

What you and the OP posted was a dead OJP page. Zero proof it ever linked to Amber alert.


Firstly, fuck you for continuing the "your party" shit. Secondly I did not link an OJP page, dead or alive. Try to take more care going in and out so you don't keep bumping your head on your rock.

K.





Yachtie -> RE: Amber Alert v Michelle (10/7/2013 10:51:38 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

And the site is not down.

http://www.amberalert.gov/

The story is a fake one from the beck`s lunatic fringe site, as is the link.

The op was duped ....

No, you're just out of touch. It was down. NBC carried the story, along with a screenshot of the page.
[image]local://upfiles/235229/CA641B2796AF4E3EB67C1F733B73BBD2.jpg[/image]

The site only just came back online this morning.

K.


I`m talking about the UM vs Michele story/spin....which is what duped the brain dead in your party.

What you and the OP posted was a dead OJP page. Zero proof it ever linked to Amber alert.

Again for the willfully ignorant and dishonest, Amber Alert was NEVER down

Glad to see you defend them and that garbage.....[8|]




Yes it was. It's exactly the addy that I got.

It's all about the federal shutdown, thus the DOJ's site was offline. Not any states.

Do try and keep up.




mnottertail -> RE: Amber Alert v Michelle (10/7/2013 11:00:50 AM)

Active AMBER Alerts™

The Department of Justice’s Office of Justice Programs has asked the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC) to serve in a clearinghouse capacity for the AMBER Alert program and to aid in the dissemination of AMBER Alert information. Information on active AMBER Alerts is available on NCMEC's web site.

and a link.


Hmmmmmm. that is much ado about nothing, it has been that way for some time. That page being down (since there is no info there anyhow....) I would judge it non-essential to government operations, a blank page that redirects you to another site.

Perhaps someone can effectively argue the contrapositive?




graceadieu -> RE: Amber Alert v Michelle (10/7/2013 11:07:53 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: RacerJim
Washington DC parking enforcement wasn't shut down last Saturday either...at least not around the WWII & Korean & Vietnam Memorials.


DC parking enforcement is handled by the city, not the federal government. The DC city government hasn't been shut down. Why would they stop enforcing city parking regulations?




Kirata -> RE: Amber Alert v Michelle (10/7/2013 11:28:52 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
That page being down (since there is no info there anyhow....) I would judge it non-essential to government operations...
Perhaps someone can effectively argue the contrapositive?

NBC has rewritten their story (nicely styled as an "update"). However, until this morning the amberalert.gov link to the Active Alerts list at missingkids.com would not have been available to anyone going to amberalert.gov while it was down.

Additionally, amberalert.gov hosts a list of the appropriate state-level contacts for every state, including phone numbers and websites. This, too, would have been unavailable to anyone needing that information.

Arguably they could have found it if they knew how to look for it, and probably found missingkids.com too. But on the other hand, not everybody is web savvy and the whole point of amberalert.gov is so people don't have to do that.

So, essential to government operations, versus essential? I'd say it's more essential by any definition than maintaining the golf course at Andrews Air Force Base. 

K.




mnottertail -> RE: Amber Alert v Michelle (10/7/2013 11:36:28 AM)

Ah, you think that if you have a missing kid, you aint gonna find that out after thousands of times of going to that page to get directed to the real page?

Yeah, I agree, everybody would just give the fuck up at that point.

Nobody here posting was going to that site, they didn't know about it, look at the drivel being spewed. They would have googled has they not had some spin to blowhole and it was something of substance.




Yachtie -> RE: Amber Alert v Michelle (10/7/2013 11:43:06 AM)

Interesting, though, how Michelle's web site is fully operational. No shut down there[;)]




mnottertail -> RE: Amber Alert v Michelle (10/7/2013 11:48:34 AM)

Yeah, nations health is essential, we need more war fodder for the cowardly teabbaggers who are not going to do wars anymore, but continue building our military-industrial complex.




Owner59 -> RE: Amber Alert v Michelle (10/7/2013 11:57:41 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Yachtie


quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

And the site is not down.

http://www.amberalert.gov/

The story is a fake one from the beck`s lunatic fringe site, as is the link.

The op was duped ....

No, you're just out of touch. It was down. NBC carried the story, along with a screenshot of the page.
[image]local://upfiles/235229/CA641B2796AF4E3EB67C1F733B73BBD2.jpg[/image]

The site only just came back online this morning.

K.


I`m talking about the UM vs Michele story/spin....which is what duped the brain dead in your party.

What you and the OP posted was a dead OJP page. Zero proof it ever linked to Amber alert.

Again for the willfully ignorant and dishonest, Amber Alert was NEVER down

Glad to see you defend them and that garbage.....[8|]




Yes it was. It's exactly the addy that I got.

It's all about the federal shutdown, thus the DOJ's site was offline. Not any states.

Do try and keep up.


"A spokesperson for the Justice Department on Monday said the Amber Alert system itself was never down",

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/10/amber-alert-website-down-97928.html#ixzz2h43PJwjS


Not sure what more embarrassing/disgusting....your party hiding behind UMs to cover your maleficence or claiming that Amber Alert was down.






Yachtie -> RE: Amber Alert v Michelle (10/7/2013 12:04:22 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

No evidence the linked page was connected with Amber Alert...


The Office Of Judicial Projects does many things including working with Amber Alert.


What you and the dupes did was post an empty page from the OLP, claiming it was an Amber alert page.


Not sure what more embarrassing/disgusting....your party hiding behind UMs to cover your maleficence or trying to convince us you weren`t duped.




[sm=rofl.gif]






Owner59 -> RE: Amber Alert v Michelle (10/7/2013 12:11:05 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

I`m talking about the UM vs Michele story/spin....which is what duped the brain dead in your party.

What you and the OP posted was a dead OJP page. Zero proof it ever linked to Amber alert.


Firstly, fuck you for continuing the "your party" shit. Secondly I did not link an OJP page, dead or alive. Try to take more care going in and out so you don't keep bumping your head on your rock.

K.





Sorry but if one sounds like a republican and looks like a republican and defends republican garbage....they`re probably a republican.


So why is your party shutting down the government and then scurrying around restoring the service cuts that are most embrassing for your party?







Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875