MrRodgers
Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri quote:
ORIGINAL: MrRodgers How's that ? Well, the corporation being charged with the fiduciary responsibility to maximize profits, would then be able to reduce payroll. Payroll is among the corp's. highest expenses so.....? The company could reduce its search for communist slave labor, reducing costs even further. The highest possible unemployment would be a great profit center and a win-win situation. Well, win for the corp., win for the investors but not such a win for labor but then...who cares about them ? I mean think about it, 20-25% unemployment would have say 8000 people applying for one $12.50/hr. janitorial position. Well, wait...we already have that. So then why not offer say $9/hr or hey, yea, that's the ticket...reduce all jobs to minimum wage and that way we could get back down to say 15% unemployment. What's that you say...didn't slave have jobs ? Well, yes they did and look how well that turned out...for the slave owners...history's greatest profit center. I mean fuck the slaves, we are here to make some money and this means...more money and that's all that matters in the American society, right ? Well, I do have a point right ? There's the whole customer requirement, though. If someone is willing to work for $5/hr. why shouldn't they be allowed to? I agree and many do but acquiescing to the goals of the corporation puts govt. as [its] partner. The role of govt. as many intellects of the pass have tried to tell us is to reign in the power of the corporation from creating a pauper or slave labor society...it having and assuming no responsibility to do otherwise. We would still be killing people all over industrial America (and they still are far too often) and have 12 year old working 70 hour weeks for .10/hr.
|