popeye1250
Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006 From: New Hampshire Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: AthenaSurrenders Dominant does not necessarily mean male. Even if they are D/s, it doesn't mean that one of them needs to identify as the male part of the relationship. 'Male' and 'female' are not necessary for love. You need two people with strengths, personalities and interests that go well together. You can have stereotypically male traits like strength, a dominant attitude, skill at home repairs, interest in sports (and so on) and still be and feel entirely female. Likewise, a man isn't any less male if he cries at sad films or takes time doing his hair. In other words, you don't have to have male half and a female half to make a strong whole. Again, with the rings, it's personal taste. If it were me, I'd want some symbol of the engagement, but it's an individual choice. Athena, thankyou for your reply. That clears things up a lot. As you can see I'm pretty much ignorant on this subject but curious none the less. I've obviously been using straight stereotypes to apply to gays and bisexuals because that was the only basis I knew to apply and compare it to. "Wife and wife" really makes sense now. Another thing that I'm wondering about, "who" gets walked down the aisle?
_____________________________
"But Your Honor, this is not a Jury of my Peers, these people are all decent, honest, law-abiding citizens!"
|