New CM rule suggestion

New CM rule suggestion (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid

Message

LookieNoNookie -> New CM rule suggestion (10/31/2013 3:26:14 PM)
Women should be required to post a minimum of 25 photos....clothed or otherwise, or they're disallowed ("otherwise" gets my vote). I haven't worked out my full argument yet but, I think it works.

OsideGirl -> RE: New CM rule suggestion (10/31/2013 3:32:20 PM)
[image]http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-ArwLQqJbT80/UXueS-IUWMI/AAAAAAABHgQ/Ipn4ghqIyiw/s1600/1.jpg[/image]

LookieNoNookie -> RE: New CM rule suggestion (10/31/2013 3:55:17 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: OsideGirl [image]http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-ArwLQqJbT80/UXueS-IUWMI/AAAAAAABHgQ/Ipn4ghqIyiw/s1600/1.jpg[/image] I don't feel you're truly focusing on the intent of the new rule.

Spiritedsub2 -> RE: New CM rule suggestion (10/31/2013 4:00:04 PM)
She got you, babe. It's the letter, not the spirit, of the law that counts (unless the reverse is what the lawyer wants).

LadyPact -> RE: New CM rule suggestion (10/31/2013 4:04:17 PM)
I'm all for it, as long as I can post twenty-five post play pics of the bottoms that I engage with. [:D]

LookieNoNookie -> RE: New CM rule suggestion (10/31/2013 4:13:20 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LadyPact I'm all for it, as long as I can post twenty-five post play pics of the bottoms that I engage with. [:D] See....once again, I'm sensing that some people are not fully engaged with the spirit of this new rule.

LadyPact -> RE: New CM rule suggestion (10/31/2013 6:05:48 PM)
[8D] quote: ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie See....once again, I'm sensing that some people are not fully engaged with the spirit of this new rule. Talk nice to Me and I'll let you be #15.[8D]

DesFIP -> RE: New CM rule suggestion (11/1/2013 3:54:41 AM)
http://www.shutterstock.com/pic-115593577/stock-photo-mixed-christmas-cookies-colorful-mix-of-christmas-themed-decorated-cookies.html?src=cuny7D3uSfZOu-lBZyaAPA-1-2 I gave up trying to post the pic but here's a link to a picture of at least 25 cookies

TNDommeK -> RE: New CM rule suggestion (11/1/2013 11:46:23 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LadyPact [8D] quote: ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie See....once again, I'm sensing that some people are not fully engaged with the spirit of this new rule. Talk nice to Me and I'll let you be #15.[8D] Ahhh hahaha

LookieNoNookie -> RE: New CM rule suggestion (11/1/2013 5:43:56 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LadyPact [8D] quote: ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie See....once again, I'm sensing that some people are not fully engaged with the spirit of this new rule. Talk nice to Me and I'll let you be #15.[8D] Clearly, you're missing the essence of this thing....me....we're not looking for pictures of me. I can see me....every morning....me doesn't appeal to me (even remotely....yes, there was that one time but...I was really high and....the heels took my breath away...frankly, they still do)....so let's move away from the whole "me" thing (unless of course, we're talking about me, wherein which I'll probably on occasion say "and....so....is there more?")....but let's move back to the photo issue which is really the more predominant issue.... More. Wimmens. Nekkid. (I think I wasn't as clear previously on the 3rd of the 3 above mentioned predicates as I feel I'm being now).

Esinn -> RE: New CM rule suggestion (11/1/2013 10:16:52 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: OsideGirl [image]http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-ArwLQqJbT80/UXueS-IUWMI/AAAAAAABHgQ/Ipn4ghqIyiw/s1600/1.jpg[/image] That is 36? pictures and in direct violation of the new purposed regulation.

SeekingTrinity -> RE: New CM rule suggestion (11/1/2013 10:32:16 PM)
For you...nekkid pussy. Enjoy [:D]

SeekingTrinity -> RE: New CM rule suggestion (11/1/2013 10:35:01 PM)
Grr, trying again [image]local://upfiles/1427212/3BCD401BE5F14625ADBA022031DD7F9C.jpg[/image]

SylvereApLeanan -> RE: New CM rule suggestion (11/1/2013 10:38:52 PM)
Pfft. That's not nekkid pussy... This is nekkid pussy. [image]http://www.city-data.com/forum/attachments/cats/10644d1195805559-cat-hairless_cat_spreads.jpg[/image]

SeekingTrinity -> RE: New CM rule suggestion (11/1/2013 10:45:45 PM)
You're right! Well played [:D]

AdorkableAiley -> RE: New CM rule suggestion (11/2/2013 3:24:49 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie quote: ORIGINAL: OsideGirl [image]http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-ArwLQqJbT80/UXueS-IUWMI/AAAAAAABHgQ/Ipn4ghqIyiw/s1600/1.jpg[/image] I don't feel you're truly focusing on the intent of the new rule. I think she was brilliant!

LookieNoNookie -> RE: New CM rule suggestion (11/2/2013 6:34:06 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Esinn quote: ORIGINAL: OsideGirl [image]http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-ArwLQqJbT80/UXueS-IUWMI/AAAAAAABHgQ/Ipn4ghqIyiw/s1600/1.jpg[/image] That is 36? pictures and in direct violation of the new purposed regulation. I was gonna say something about that but....I felt she was sincere.....even as she failed.

LookieNoNookie -> RE: New CM rule suggestion (11/2/2013 6:36:12 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SylvereApLeanan Pfft. That's not nekkid pussy... This is nekkid pussy. [image]http://www.city-data.com/forum/attachments/cats/10644d1195805559-cat-hairless_cat_spreads.jpg[/image] Gawdammit....how do you put a photo in here!!!!

OsideGirl -> RE: New CM rule suggestion (11/2/2013 8:04:39 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Esinn That is 36? pictures and in direct violation of the new purposed regulation. He said "a minimum of 25", so technically, I over-achieved!

HarryVanWinkle -> RE: New CM rule suggestion (11/3/2013 4:15:20 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: OsideGirl [image]http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-ArwLQqJbT80/UXueS-IUWMI/AAAAAAABHgQ/Ipn4ghqIyiw/s1600/1.jpg[/image] Umm, why do you have 36 pictures there? Oops. Once again, that should teach me to read the whole thread before posting. It should, but I doubt it will.

Page: [1]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875