Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Banned from School Grounds for a legal activity...


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Banned from School Grounds for a legal activity... Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Banned from School Grounds for a legal activity... - 11/8/2013 2:38:46 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
where do you get her being a veteran had anything to do with their decision???

--------------------------

Because they asked her 2 questions.
Had she been in the Army.
Did she have a permit.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to tj444)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Banned from School Grounds for a legal activity... - 11/8/2013 2:40:13 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

Army veteran Mom not allowed on school grounds because of a Facebook pic of her Concealed Carry permit.

Part of me hopes there's more to this story than that she was simply banned because of the pic. But, another part of me hopes that there isn't any other reason (ie. that the woman is an actual danger to the kids).

I look forward to seeing how this all shakes out. I don't know that we've heard the entire story yet.

well gee, McDs, Starbucks and other businesses, govt buildings etc don't allow weapons on their property so why should this school be any different? they have the right to do that, especially since its concealed.. imo its not the "mom" that's banned, its her weapon that is.. they don't want to take the chance she will come on the property with it.. not to mention, it also gives kids the chance to grab it (depending on how she carries it) and all hell break loose.. not to mention the school's liability.. now what would happen if a kid did somehow get ahold of it from her and someone got hurt, wouldn't everyone be blaming the school for not acting to prevent her from being on the property? really, the school cant win either way.. and perhaps it was another parent (who is anti-gun on school grounds) that alerted the school to this issue.. again, if that is what happened, the school likely turned it over to their lawyers and insurance company and were advised to take this action..

They didn't ban her for carrying a gun on campus but for having a permit and being a veteran.
They asked her about those to things but not if she was carrying.

where do you get her being a veteran had anything to do with their decision???

if she didn't have a gun yet, the fact she has a cc license is a pretty good sign she will be getting one soon.. so cuz of that and cuz that she had been a problem before.. she has already moved her kid to another school now.. so why is she raising a stink about it now that the problem has been resolved??? (I am getting the impression the school was right about her being a problem since she is continuing to be a problem).. lucky for that school, she is that new schools problem now..

Because the principal is paranoid and she wants an apology.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to tj444)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Banned from School Grounds for a legal activity... - 11/8/2013 2:45:49 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
Army veteran Mom not allowed on school grounds because of a Facebook pic of her Concealed Carry permit.

Part of me hopes there's more to this story than that she was simply banned because of the pic. But, another part of me hopes that there isn't any other reason (ie. that the woman is an actual danger to the kids).

I look forward to seeing how this all shakes out. I don't know that we've heard the entire story yet.


There could be circumstances beyond the resources of the reporting that have determined the person in question is ban from the school. I'm not going to speculate on the woman's personal background as it relates to this issue. It could be all be perfectly understandable. Or just a case of 'hyper vigilance' in action. Before leaping to the woman's side 'just cus she has a firearm' shows a distinct lack of common sense. None of us know what this woman's mental and emotional health levels are at. Nor current criminal background if any. Perhaps she has laid threat towards a teacher because her kid was performing badly in school but due to laws could not publically explain the issue.

The point of a Concealable Carry is so the criminal DOESN'T know you are carrying a firearm (....duh!). When you plaster the CC permit on the internet (Facebook of all things!), doesn't exactly.....HIDE.....the idea that you are carrying. Its like saying someone has a concealed gun locker and than posting pictures on Facebook as to where it is located in thier house. Would you take the person seriously upon learning this?

Shame there was no claim she was armed.
They didn't even ask if she was armed.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Banned from School Grounds for a legal activity... - 11/8/2013 2:46:19 PM   
MasterCaneman


Posts: 3842
Joined: 3/21/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: kalikshama

Ya, what do the rest of you think about her posting her CC permit on FB? I think it shows lack of judgement.

I agree it does show a lack of judgement on her part. The idea behind a CC is for people to NOT know you're carrying a firearm. I will admit, due to my posting of the fact I have a CCW here along with my pic is probably not the wisest thing to do, but CM is nowhere near to FB in its reach and scope. When I got mine issued (in this state, I've had them in others before), I told three people, total. What she did in posting it to the world was to, in effect, make herself a target, either for what happened at her kid's school, or for some enterprising individual who now has a solid lead that someone's got firearms and ammo at their house.

_____________________________

Age and treachery will always overcome youth and ambition.

The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting. ~ Sun Tzu

Goddess Wrangler



(in reply to kalikshama)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: Banned from School Grounds for a legal activity... - 11/8/2013 2:57:12 PM   
MasterCaneman


Posts: 3842
Joined: 3/21/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
A helicopter mom packing heat? Hell yeah I'd ban her from my school if I was a principal.


Not to distract from the gravitas of this thread, but Helicopter Mom Packing Heat would make a great movie title...

_____________________________

Age and treachery will always overcome youth and ambition.

The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting. ~ Sun Tzu

Goddess Wrangler



(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: Banned from School Grounds for a legal activity... - 11/8/2013 3:01:41 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterCaneman


quote:

ORIGINAL: kalikshama

Ya, what do the rest of you think about her posting her CC permit on FB? I think it shows lack of judgement.

I agree it does show a lack of judgement on her part. The idea behind a CC is for people to NOT know you're carrying a firearm. I will admit, due to my posting of the fact I have a CCW here along with my pic is probably not the wisest thing to do, but CM is nowhere near to FB in its reach and scope. When I got mine issued (in this state, I've had them in others before), I told three people, total. What she did in posting it to the world was to, in effect, make herself a target, either for what happened at her kid's school, or for some enterprising individual who now has a solid lead that someone's got firearms and ammo at their house.

I wouldn't have posted it either but that is just a distraction, they asked her about 2 things, neither was illegal. And since they sent a Cop to meet her at the door and ask the questions they were banning her no matter what she said 

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to MasterCaneman)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: Banned from School Grounds for a legal activity... - 11/8/2013 3:22:46 PM   
igor2003


Posts: 1718
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterCaneman


quote:

ORIGINAL: kalikshama

Ya, what do the rest of you think about her posting her CC permit on FB? I think it shows lack of judgement.

I agree it does show a lack of judgement on her part. The idea behind a CC is for people to NOT know you're carrying a firearm. I will admit, due to my posting of the fact I have a CCW here along with my pic is probably not the wisest thing to do, but CM is nowhere near to FB in its reach and scope. When I got mine issued (in this state, I've had them in others before), I told three people, total. What she did in posting it to the world was to, in effect, make herself a target, either for what happened at her kid's school, or for some enterprising individual who now has a solid lead that someone's got firearms and ammo at their house.


Just because someone has a CC permit does NOT necessarily mean that they carry one all or even most of the time. Yes, for SOME people the main issue is to not have it be known. For others it doesn't mean diddly shit either way. Just because this woman didn't see things in your "one twue way" doesn't automatically mean she had any lack of judgement. It just means that she doesn't have the same issues that you do. Me, personally, I don't know what information could be seen in the photo. Did it show her address? I don't know. Do you know? And without her address, then what difference does it make that anyone knows she has a gun and ammunition. Besides...if anyone DID gain knowledge of her address, they now know that that house is protected by a firearm. Kinda works both ways, doesn't it?




_____________________________

If the women don't find you handsome they should at least find you handy. - Red Green

At my age erections are like cops...there's never one around when you need it!

Never miss a good chance to shut up. - Will Rogers


(in reply to MasterCaneman)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: Banned from School Grounds for a legal activity... - 11/8/2013 3:35:39 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250


quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

Army veteran Mom not allowed on school grounds because of a Facebook pic of her Concealed Carry permit.

Part of me hopes there's more to this story than that she was simply banned because of the pic. But, another part of me hopes that there isn't any other reason (ie. that the woman is an actual danger to the kids).

I look forward to seeing how this all shakes out. I don't know that we've heard the entire story yet.


One thing, it's public property. She or anyone else have a right to be there.



Actually that`s not true at all.....Please just walk into any school Pops saying you want to check it out and see how long it takes the cops to get there...


There was a small fart that came from the gun-nutteria just after all those youngsters were eviscerated at Sandy Hook....a suggestion that teachers be armed.


But it wasn`t the desperate parents pleading for sanity that stopped the gun-nutters from introducing more weapons into our children`s living spaces....


It was the insurance companies who write the policies for the schools that said no...... No guns ,legal or otherwise.....or no policy.


As well, schools have wide latitude as to what goes on in their "public" property, especially where children`s safety in concerned.

< Message edited by Owner59 -- 11/8/2013 3:39:35 PM >


_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to popeye1250)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: Banned from School Grounds for a legal activity... - 11/8/2013 3:40:33 PM   
kalikshama


Posts: 14805
Joined: 8/8/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: OsideGirl

quote:

ORIGINAL: kalikshama

Ya, what do the rest of you think about her posting her CC permit on FB? I think it shows lack of judgement.


I think it shows that she needs to change the privacy setting on her Facebook to friends only.

Personally, I wouldn't show it simply because the ideal of carry concealed is that the general public doesn't know that you're carrying.

But, it could simply be that she's proud that she passed the course and wanted to mark the achievement.


I think the administration took it as an aggressive statement, added that to her being "disruptive" and "highly protective of her daughter" and didn't like the results of that formula.

(in reply to OsideGirl)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: Banned from School Grounds for a legal activity... - 11/8/2013 3:41:50 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

Army veteran Mom not allowed on school grounds because of a Facebook pic of her Concealed Carry permit.

Part of me hopes there's more to this story than that she was simply banned because of the pic. But, another part of me hopes that there isn't any other reason (ie. that the woman is an actual danger to the kids).

I look forward to seeing how this all shakes out. I don't know that we've heard the entire story yet.

well gee, McDs, Starbucks and other businesses, govt buildings etc don't allow weapons on their property so why should this school be any different? they have the right to do that, especially since its concealed.. imo its not the "mom" that's banned, its her weapon that is.. they don't want to take the chance she will come on the property with it.. not to mention, it also gives kids the chance to grab it (depending on how she carries it) and all hell break loose.. not to mention the school's liability.. now what would happen if a kid did somehow get ahold of it from her and someone got hurt, wouldn't everyone be blaming the school for not acting to prevent her from being on the property? really, the school cant win either way.. and perhaps it was another parent (who is anti-gun on school grounds) that alerted the school to this issue.. again, if that is what happened, the school likely turned it over to their lawyers and insurance company and were advised to take this action..



So first of all, the fact that McD's and others do it, doesn't make it legal. It just means that no one has attempted yet to sue, to overturn.

As to whats the difference: Government operates under restrictions, enumerated in various place - the constitution for the feds for one. Private enterprise operates under different restrictions.

(in reply to tj444)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: Banned from School Grounds for a legal activity... - 11/8/2013 3:42:07 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
But, she is the only one that was banned.

She was the only cc permit holder who had been disruptive at that school who was banned.


It wasn't something across the board to all CC permit holders.

Perhaps that was because the other cc permit holders had not been disruptive at that school.

And, within the law, there are legal ways for one to possess a gun within 1000 feet of a school, even while you have your CC permit.

None of those regulations allow her to carry a firearm into the school on her person.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: Banned from School Grounds for a legal activity... - 11/8/2013 3:43:58 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
"A New Gun Problem: ‘Responsible’ Gun Owners Leaving Loaded Guns All Over The Place"

http://www.addictinginfo.org/2013/11/06/loaded-guns-lost-epidemic-us/



"More guns means less violence right? Wrong. More guns means more guns. If you’ve ever lost your purse, wallet, keys or cell phone, chances are you know how easy it is to leave something behind that you’re used to having with you all the time. If you’ve never lost your loaded gun, chances are you’re not a “responsible” gun owner.

Pro-gun Congresswoman Ellmers isn’t as “responsible” as she claims.

In October GOP congresswoman Renee Ellmers reported that her gun had gone missing from her Kansas home. Ellmers, who left her AR-15 leaning against a locker in her unlocked garage, is an avid gun rights supporter. She claims that gun owners, like herself, are totally responsible and don’t need the government interfering in their business. As it turns out, however, Ellmers, like too many other gun owners, isn’t as responsible as she claims. Hopefully, her missing gun will not be used to murder someone. But even if it does, surely we can’t blame her? She’s a “responsible” gun owner, after all.

After Missouri House staffer, Dave Evans, left his loaded gun in the men’s restroom of the State Capital Building on September 23, 2013, the incident drew a brief flurry of national media attention. It also drew the typical right-wing responses about all the “responsible gun owners” in the world. Except, you know, when they leave the gun in the bathroom…"


"responsible"




_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: Banned from School Grounds for a legal activity... - 11/8/2013 3:49:16 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
Yeah. Too bad.

So first of all, the fact that McD's and others do it, does make it legal. It just means that no one has attempted yet to sue, to overturn.


Why is government coersion necessary to deprive private enterprise of it's rights. A business can legally tell potential customers "no shirt,no shoes,no servic. Yet this would indicate that a business does not have the right to protect it's interest from the punkassmotherfuckers who feel their rights exceed all others.

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: Banned from School Grounds for a legal activity... - 11/8/2013 4:23:17 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux
So first of all, the fact that McD's and others do it, doesn't make it legal. It just means that no one has attempted yet to sue, to overturn.

Try it. Any business can refuse to do business with people who fit any condition the business owner desires except those covered by the civil rights act. No shoes no shirt no service is legal as is a no guns policy.

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: Banned from School Grounds for a legal activity... - 11/8/2013 4:39:37 PM   
MasterCaneman


Posts: 3842
Joined: 3/21/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: igor2003


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterCaneman


quote:

ORIGINAL: kalikshama

Ya, what do the rest of you think about her posting her CC permit on FB? I think it shows lack of judgement.

I agree it does show a lack of judgement on her part. The idea behind a CC is for people to NOT know you're carrying a firearm. I will admit, due to my posting of the fact I have a CCW here along with my pic is probably not the wisest thing to do, but CM is nowhere near to FB in its reach and scope. When I got mine issued (in this state, I've had them in others before), I told three people, total. What she did in posting it to the world was to, in effect, make herself a target, either for what happened at her kid's school, or for some enterprising individual who now has a solid lead that someone's got firearms and ammo at their house.


Just because someone has a CC permit does NOT necessarily mean that they carry one all or even most of the time. Yes, for SOME people the main issue is to not have it be known. For others it doesn't mean diddly shit either way. Just because this woman didn't see things in your "one twue way" doesn't automatically mean she had any lack of judgement. It just means that she doesn't have the same issues that you do. Me, personally, I don't know what information could be seen in the photo. Did it show her address? I don't know. Do you know? And without her address, then what difference does it make that anyone knows she has a gun and ammunition. Besides...if anyone DID gain knowledge of her address, they now know that that house is protected by a firearm. Kinda works both ways, doesn't it?





You raise several valid points there. It's true, not all permit holders carry all the time, and it would seem counter-intuitive to seek out a home where you know there's at least one armed resident, wouldn't it? And even if she did blur or obscure her name and address on the image, I'll bet she's using her real name on her FB page. Nowadays, it doesn't take a lot to start putting things together until you come up with a street address.

Going back to the 'not carrying all the time' point you made-if she's not home, but her weapon is, that's where the payoff is. It's why there was a big stink when they started publishing NYS permit holders's addresses a while back. You can't stay home all the time, and it's impractical to take everything that goes bang with you all the time. Sooner or later, someone's going to get in and no matter how good your security is, if they have enough time and the right tools, they will get it. What she essentially did was put a big red flag on herself when she posted it online. When I took my course, the instructor told us repeatedly not to tell everyone in earshot we had one for that very reason.

And I'm not "twue" anything. I call 'em like I see 'em, and she screwed the pooch on this one in a number of ways. It goes to the very concept of concealed carry: no one knows you have a weapon on your person except yourself. If she'd have checked her attitude and remembered what OPSEC stood for (she is an Army vet, after all), this would be a non-issue. But, as others have mentioned above, there's more to all of this than what's being reported, I'm quite sure.

_____________________________

Age and treachery will always overcome youth and ambition.

The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting. ~ Sun Tzu

Goddess Wrangler



(in reply to igor2003)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: Banned from School Grounds for a legal activity... - 11/8/2013 8:18:02 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterCaneman


quote:

ORIGINAL: igor2003


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterCaneman


quote:

ORIGINAL: kalikshama

Ya, what do the rest of you think about her posting her CC permit on FB? I think it shows lack of judgement.

I agree it does show a lack of judgement on her part. The idea behind a CC is for people to NOT know you're carrying a firearm. I will admit, due to my posting of the fact I have a CCW here along with my pic is probably not the wisest thing to do, but CM is nowhere near to FB in its reach and scope. When I got mine issued (in this state, I've had them in others before), I told three people, total. What she did in posting it to the world was to, in effect, make herself a target, either for what happened at her kid's school, or for some enterprising individual who now has a solid lead that someone's got firearms and ammo at their house.


Just because someone has a CC permit does NOT necessarily mean that they carry one all or even most of the time. Yes, for SOME people the main issue is to not have it be known. For others it doesn't mean diddly shit either way. Just because this woman didn't see things in your "one twue way" doesn't automatically mean she had any lack of judgement. It just means that she doesn't have the same issues that you do. Me, personally, I don't know what information could be seen in the photo. Did it show her address? I don't know. Do you know? And without her address, then what difference does it make that anyone knows she has a gun and ammunition. Besides...if anyone DID gain knowledge of her address, they now know that that house is protected by a firearm. Kinda works both ways, doesn't it?





You raise several valid points there. It's true, not all permit holders carry all the time, and it would seem counter-intuitive to seek out a home where you know there's at least one armed resident, wouldn't it? And even if she did blur or obscure her name and address on the image, I'll bet she's using her real name on her FB page. Nowadays, it doesn't take a lot to start putting things together until you come up with a street address.

Going back to the 'not carrying all the time' point you made-if she's not home, but her weapon is, that's where the payoff is. It's why there was a big stink when they started publishing NYS permit holders's addresses a while back. You can't stay home all the time, and it's impractical to take everything that goes bang with you all the time. Sooner or later, someone's going to get in and no matter how good your security is, if they have enough time and the right tools, they will get it. What she essentially did was put a big red flag on herself when she posted it online. When I took my course, the instructor told us repeatedly not to tell everyone in earshot we had one for that very reason.

And I'm not "twue" anything. I call 'em like I see 'em, and she screwed the pooch on this one in a number of ways. It goes to the very concept of concealed carry: no one knows you have a weapon on your person except yourself. If she'd have checked her attitude and remembered what OPSEC stood for (she is an Army vet, after all), this would be a non-issue. But, as others have mentioned above, there's more to all of this than what's being reported, I'm quite sure.

Don't let them sidetrack you about whether she should have made the post.
Her carrying doesn't seem to be an issue. 
If she was carrying that's all the principal would have had to say.
Disrupting classes may mean that  whenever she was able to get to the school she insisted on talking to the teacher, even if they were in class. 
Doesn't want her kid pushed around sounds like her kid was possibly being bullied.  

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to MasterCaneman)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: Banned from School Grounds for a legal activity... - 11/8/2013 10:09:57 PM   
EdBowie


Posts: 875
Joined: 8/11/2013
Status: offline
What part of the already posted state law that says she can pick up her kid from school while armed do you not understand?

"This prohibition shall not apply to: organized sport shooting events, firearms training courses, persons licensed to carry when such person carries or picks up a student,"

And in any case, it's been pointed out over and over that she wasn't found armed on school property, she was banned for merely having a permit.




quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
Army veteran Mom not allowed on school grounds because of a Facebook pic of her Concealed Carry permit.

Part of me hopes there's more to this story than that she was simply banned because of the pic. But, another part of me hopes that there isn't any other reason (ie. that the woman is an actual danger to the kids).

I look forward to seeing how this all shakes out. I don't know that we've heard the entire story yet.


One thing, it's public property. She or anyone else have a right to be there.


Not if your carrying a gun and your not law enforcement you don't. How many school shootings have there been when a firearm was involved? You can say all you want that someone with a CC would NEVER do something like this. How about the teenager who cold-cocks the CC person on the back of the head, takes the arm and begins shooting because they REALLY have just snapped? I'm sure the idea has already happen in the past.....

That if you come to the school, lock your weapon with the principle first before entering further I could agree on. How intelligent much less wise is it, to allow a parent, whom may become extremely mad at a teacher during a discussion, to 'whipping it out and shooting them' in blind rage? The reason they call it 'blind rage' is the frontal section of the human brain shuts down. That's the area that controls reasoning, thinking, and decision making. When people get REALLY made, they do dumb things they often regret later on. Can you imagine the field day the 'gun control' folks would have if this event were to happen? Would it not make sense to keep the arm out of the school, even in the super unlikely event its used for a school shooting?

Now if the local police chief gives the 'ok' for a civilian to be allowed access into a school with a CC due to unforeseen reasons (the person is targeted by some hate group for example), its then on the chief's responsibility if anything goes wrong. And I'm sure there will be hell to pay if anything went wrong with that arm.



< Message edited by EdBowie -- 11/8/2013 10:14:07 PM >

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: Banned from School Grounds for a legal activity... - 11/8/2013 10:22:20 PM   
EdBowie


Posts: 875
Joined: 8/11/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444

where do you get her being a veteran had anything to do with their decision???

if she didn't have a gun yet, the fact she has a cc license is a pretty good sign she will be getting one soon.. so cuz of that and cuz that she had been a problem before.. she has already moved her kid to another school now.. so why is she raising a stink about it now that the problem has been resolved??? (I am getting the impression the school was right about her being a problem since she is continuing to be a problem).. lucky for that school, she is that new schools problem now..



The names of all CCW holders are public record, did the school ban any others? Or just her?

Because if they didn't do a thorough records search and take the same action, the whole 'safety of the children' excuse falls apart.


(in reply to tj444)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: Banned from School Grounds for a legal activity... - 11/8/2013 10:27:59 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: EdBowie


quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444

where do you get her being a veteran had anything to do with their decision???

if she didn't have a gun yet, the fact she has a cc license is a pretty good sign she will be getting one soon.. so cuz of that and cuz that she had been a problem before.. she has already moved her kid to another school now.. so why is she raising a stink about it now that the problem has been resolved??? (I am getting the impression the school was right about her being a problem since she is continuing to be a problem).. lucky for that school, she is that new schools problem now..



The names of all CCW holders are public record, did the school ban any others? Or just her?

Because if they didn't do a thorough records search and take the same action, the whole 'safety of the children' excuse falls apart.




If that was the case wouldn't the principal have said so, instead she made allegations about being afraid of this specific woman.  I would like to know why she feared the mother.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to EdBowie)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: Banned from School Grounds for a legal activity... - 11/8/2013 10:39:53 PM   
EdBowie


Posts: 875
Joined: 8/11/2013
Status: offline
The words 'I am afraid of this specific woman' appear in what article? The principal stated to the news that it was because of the permit, and the need to protect the kids.

"A reporter from News Channel 6 tracked down the school's principal and confirmed the no trespass order was issued because Mount had posted a photo of the permit to Facebook"


Dallas confirmed to WJBF-TV that Mount was banned from the school due to the Facebook post.
“It is my duty and responsibility as the principal of this school to ensure the safety and security of all of our faculty, staff and students,” Dallas said.
Dallas cited recent school shootings as why she was alarmed to Mount posting her weapons permit on Facebook.
“There have been a number of school shootings in our country,” Dallas told WJBF. “And inevitably, people will say they saw signs and things of that nature after the fact.”



quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: EdBowie


quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444

where do you get her being a veteran had anything to do with their decision???

if she didn't have a gun yet, the fact she has a cc license is a pretty good sign she will be getting one soon.. so cuz of that and cuz that she had been a problem before.. she has already moved her kid to another school now.. so why is she raising a stink about it now that the problem has been resolved??? (I am getting the impression the school was right about her being a problem since she is continuing to be a problem).. lucky for that school, she is that new schools problem now..



The names of all CCW holders are public record, did the school ban any others? Or just her?

Because if they didn't do a thorough records search and take the same action, the whole 'safety of the children' excuse falls apart.




If that was the case wouldn't the principal have said so, instead she made allegations about being afraid of this specific woman.  I would like to know why she feared the mother.


(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Banned from School Grounds for a legal activity... Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.125