Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Weaponry, protecting what's yours


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master >> RE: Weaponry, protecting what's yours Page: <<   < prev  7 8 [9] 10 11   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Weaponry, protecting what's yours - 7/12/2006 11:52:17 AM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline
fast reply:

For the record I am not against people owning guns nor do I think that everyone that owns a gun is  dangerous, nor am I against people that own them, nor would I want to repeal the Second Amendment... I want myself on the record as saying this because I do not like it when others  to misrepresent what I have said because they know I am done arguing with them, I may not address the person again, but I will not tolerate my views being skewed and warped for their agenda either.

_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to JohnWarren)
Profile   Post #: 161
RE: Weaponry, protecting what's yours - 7/12/2006 12:36:38 PM   
SirKenin


Posts: 2994
Joined: 10/31/2004
From: Barrie, ON Canada
Status: offline
Heh.  You did address them just now.  You just think you were being clever about it.    Just let it drop.  Who cares what they think?  I am not against people owning a false sense of security either.  That is their perogative.  Just remember how it goes.  You bring an Epee (bwahaha.  That still kills Me), they bring a sword.  You bring a gun, they bring a machine gun.  You bring a .50 caliber, they bring a tank.  It is just the way it goes.

_____________________________

Hi. I don't care. Thanks.

Wicca: Pretending to be an ancient religion since 1956

Catholic Church: Serving up guilt since 107 AD.

(in reply to juliaoceania)
Profile   Post #: 162
RE: Weaponry, protecting what's yours - 7/12/2006 7:09:43 PM   
Pulpsmack


Posts: 394
Joined: 4/15/2004
From: Louisiana
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

fast reply:

For the record I am not against people owning guns nor do I think that everyone that owns a gun is  dangerous, nor am I against people that own them, nor would I want to repeal the Second Amendment... I want myself on the record as saying this because I do not like it when others  to misrepresent what I have said because they know I am done arguing with them, I may not address the person again, but I will not tolerate my views being skewed and warped for their agenda either.


Are you for real?

You have already "gone on record" stating that you yourself supported the representatives in CA that helped hammer the nails in the Second Amendment's coffin, AND you concluded with "I don' t want everybody running around with guns".

Within this thread you have defended the acceptability of calling police pigs, you have voiced your desire to have the Second Amendment abridged (because you don't want people running around armed), and you have shared your philosophy that people who plan for bad things will get what's comming to them: bad things. YOU WROTE THIS... It is ALL there in black and white.

Now either one of two things (if not, some part of both) is readily apparent:

1. You are suffering mentally/emotionally.

2. Out of life's boredom, you simply react to the post you (half) read and come up with any devil's advocate argument just for the sake of arguing and you don't even bother to keep track of what your arguing.

Judging by the fact that you have joined this site 2 months ago and have already posted 1,500 times, and the fact that you still can't stop arguing after saying you won't reply any longer I am assured of the second option and still wondering about the first.

As far as this whole thing is concerned, I could care less about attacking the people but I will attack beliefs statements or arguments that I consider wrong, misinforming etc. In this case there is nowhere else to go. When you make such statements "already on the record" then LIE about what you do and do not argue, then try to turn your lies around on me claiming I have skewed your statements for my agenda, you should be held accountable.

So, here goes... You said you weren't going to respond to another thing I said. Let's try again. Unless of course you wish to go on record saying you believe in replying to everyone, you never said you were going to stop responding and here I am again skewing your words for my agenda.


(in reply to juliaoceania)
Profile   Post #: 163
RE: Weaponry, protecting what's yours - 7/12/2006 8:16:04 PM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SirKenin

Heh.  You did address them just now.  You just think you were being clever about it.    Just let it drop.  Who cares what they think?  I am not against people owning a false sense of security either.  That is their perogative.  Just remember how it goes.  You bring an Epee (bwahaha.  That still kills Me), they bring a sword.  You bring a gun, they bring a machine gun.  You bring a .50 caliber, they bring a tank.  It is just the way it goes.


Exactly, anyone can escalate a fight... thank you for pointing that out, sometimes I forget that.

_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to SirKenin)
Profile   Post #: 164
RE: Weaponry, protecting what's yours - 7/12/2006 9:54:45 PM   
IronBear


Posts: 9008
Joined: 6/19/2005
From: Beenleigh, Qld, Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

Exactly, anyone can escalate a fight... thank you for pointing that out, sometimes I forget that.


'Tis so easy to set the heather a blaze and so hard to put it out...... (My Paternal Grandfather used to say that when things looked like escalating.)


_____________________________

Iron Bear

Master of Bruin Cottage

http://www.bruincottage.org

Your attitude, words & actions are yours. Take responsibility for them and the consequences they incur.

D.I.L.L.I.G.A.F.

(in reply to juliaoceania)
Profile   Post #: 165
RE: Weaponry, protecting what's yours - 7/13/2006 12:49:05 AM   
Sinergy


Posts: 9383
Joined: 4/26/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SirKenin

Heh.  You did address them just now.  You just think you were being clever about it.    Just let it drop.  Who cares what they think?  I am not against people owning a false sense of security either.  That is their perogative.  Just remember how it goes.  You bring an Epee (bwahaha.  That still kills Me), they bring a sword.  You bring a gun, they bring a machine gun.  You bring a .50 caliber, they bring a tank.  It is just the way it goes.


I had a student in class tonight who I was dealing with in verbal drills.  This would be me coming on the mat and verbally addressing her with various creepy, angry, or not people.  Her job is to listen to what I am saying, respond to it by using various strategies, and getting me to go away.

I told her to go f*(% herself as I walked off the mat.

She asked after the drill why she could not respond to me by telling me to go f(*_ myself.

I responded with the food for thought that wtf did she care what I said, or thought of her, or whatever.  Im a total stranger with a bad attitude that she wants to go away.  Why exactly did she feel the need to continue having a conversation, albeit heated, with me?

Then I pointed out to her that most men are completely incapable of backing down from being challenged.  Well, responding to somebodies vituperative taunting is a form of a challenge.  Respond to it, and one has a fight on ones hand.

For those reading this board, if a fight is what you want, that is the easiest way to go about getting into one.

To summarize.

1)  Person A challenges Person B.

2) Person B doesnt give a good god damn about Person A and asks them to leave.

3)  Person A challenges Person B, taunting them.

4)  Person B, not giving a rats rear end what Person A thinks of them, simply ignores Person A's challenge and lets them walk away.

I read these posts about weapons and combat skills and whose penis shaped projectile or edged weapon is bigger or more deadly or has greater thrust, and I cannot help but wonder at something.

Are the people posting about how much stopping power they are carrying around going through life waiting for somebody to CONTROL THEM by making them actually do their Quick Draw McGraw impression to protect the $6.00 in their wallet?

I dont want to be in a fight.  I feel sorry for the person who corners me in a position where I have to be in one.  I have been in several fights at various times in my life, one of them prior to being highly trained, and the one with a knife wielding nut-job many years after training professionally.  I was cornered and unable to convince the person that we did not need to have this fight.

When I have not been cornered, the outcome was what I wanted it to be.  There was no fight.  My spirit was in control of the situation.

Good luck!

Sinergy




_____________________________

"There is a fine line between clever and stupid"
David St. Hubbins "This Is Spinal Tap"

"Every so often you let a word or phrase out and you want to catch it and bring it back. You cant do that, it is gone, gone forever." J. Danforth Quayle


(in reply to SirKenin)
Profile   Post #: 166
RE: Weaponry, protecting what's yours - 7/13/2006 2:15:05 AM   
Pulpsmack


Posts: 394
Joined: 4/15/2004
From: Louisiana
Status: offline
quote:


I read these posts about weapons and combat skills and whose penis shaped projectile or edged weapon is bigger or more deadly or has greater thrust, and I cannot help but wonder at something.


In all fairness, you do mention quite often how you can tear this up with your bare hands or you pity that person should they ever find themselves toe to toe with you. Overcompensation need not always be a phallic object. That said, sometimes a cigar is just a cigar, especially if such conversation takes place within the relevant fora.

I don't recall measuring bores with the next guy on the this thread but if it's killing you that much to know, "average"... and quite content with what I have

  
quote:

Are the people posting about how much stopping power they are carrying around going through life waiting for somebody to CONTROL THEM by making them actually do their Quick Draw McGraw impression to protect the $6.00 in their wallet?


Well, take a look at the other 3 fingers pointing back at you. It seems you have armed yourself with the knowledge to incapacitate, humilate, even kill another with your body. Do you look for trouble so somebody can control you into doing your Hong Kong Fooie impression to protect your freshly-starched Gi?

You claim to be a sensible person who has learned to fight for recreational, lifestyle, and defensive reasons... one who prefers to be out of harm's way and perhaps trained to help facilitate the ability to be left in peace, or at least survive to live it another day. True or untrue, I don't find this hard to swallow. Why then is it so hard for you to swallow that somebody has elected to do the same, only with a gun? What are you special?  I know of plenty of brown and black belts who thought they just earned a license to be a hard ass and that hard ass was handed to them on the street. I also had a friend who was UFC fighter who was calmer and more benevolent than most people I have ever met. Somebody slapped his girlfriend (I admit I'd be in jail after that, myself). He spun this guy face first to the hood of a car, grabbed his arm and said "You apologize to her". He did and the guy ran off. My friend didn't say it angrily and it looked like his heart rate was static. His restraint was amazing. I have a lot of respect for the martial arts and I wish I had the time in life to learn it. I think it is a valuable tool that like a firearm is very effective in limited instances and is not the answer to everything.

As to your smug attitude about these Quick Draw McGraws it just strikes me as haughty and delusional elitism that your method of defense is somehow superior. The fact is that both forms of defense are valid, effective, and important, and there are there are both sensible people and jerk-offs alike, some where black belts, some gun belts (some both).

I have been involved in a handful of fist-fights and I have had to fire my weapon on one occasion. Every time I fought I would bust my hand (or a few fingers) on somebody's face and I might have returned the favor with my face once or twice as well. There's nothing like losing the full use of your hand for 2-4 weeks. In addition, as you get older and acquire more crap assault and battery charges mean much more, especially in civil court, and especially where moral character is an essential element of your chosen profession. When you carry a gun all desire to mix it up with the loud mouth on Bourbon Street must be curbed... even when he pinches your woman's ass. You are armed with something that could kill, and in a scuffle somebody could make a reach that will turn deadly. When I didn't carry I was young, had nothing to lose, and didn't give a fuck. Not only am I older now, I am armed, and I have the responsibility to ensure nothing escalates by removing myself from the situation at all times possible. The same arrests and civil suits are far worse with a handgun then they are with any fist fight.

Moreover, you can fight every night if your hands heal properly and you can demonstrate that you were on the defense. Not so with a gun... The justified shooter receives a "broken hand" as well after a gunfight. In my state you automatically lose your CCW if within 365 days you used your firearm on more than one occasion... even if both were justified. (apparently they figure you haven't figured out how to avoid confrontation). Even if you have one and only one occurance, they review what you did before, during, and after the shooting and choose to suspend or revoke your license. All of these things up the ante for those who rely on such weapons for defense, compelling the CCW holder to be a safe, responsible and avoidant individual. There are no such governors on fists or feet.   

Also to give your earlier advice its due credit... one hand cannot clap without the other comming against it. Here (amidst that advice) you have thrown some inflammatory words about some who talk about weapons or use them for defense. If I walked away without posting, I wager you would say nothing more about it. However I have reacted to your inflammatory words and now the fight is brought to you, (which I would wager you will avoid, and that suits me fine). I consciously chose to react to any of these anti gun/2nd amendment/CCW posts because it is something I am passionate about and I will not stand for more BS and disinformation. People's complacency and ignorance have already cost us all much with respect to the second amendment ('34', '68', '86','89','94', & '05'). This is my seperate but equal, my abortion, my gay marriage stand and I will not back down from an issue that I am both right (logically) and passionate about. As you can see... I have posted under 20 times in 2 years and more than 10 have been here. When I speak here there is a damn good reason. And more silliness, fear, ignorance and disinformation about guns and (most of) those who use them responsibly will not be passed without my challenge.   

(in reply to Sinergy)
Profile   Post #: 167
RE: Weaponry, protecting what's yours - 7/13/2006 5:53:20 AM   
IronBear


Posts: 9008
Joined: 6/19/2005
From: Beenleigh, Qld, Australia
Status: offline
Some arsehols invade my place I'll lift my kilt and expose Australia's smallest secret Air base ~  an all night fighter and two hangers ~  I'll wave Big Hairy in the intruders direction and yell "en Guard ye evil fiends" The shock and attendent Cardio Failure of  at least half of them should prove sufficient to warn the rest off.... (Of course if they be female I may demand that they drop their draws and bend at the waist with asses pointing toward me for hardened throbbing flesh bayonet practice....  Have to perfect the cut and THRUST..). 

< Message edited by IronBear -- 7/13/2006 5:54:01 AM >


_____________________________

Iron Bear

Master of Bruin Cottage

http://www.bruincottage.org

Your attitude, words & actions are yours. Take responsibility for them and the consequences they incur.

D.I.L.L.I.G.A.F.

(in reply to Pulpsmack)
Profile   Post #: 168
RE: Weaponry, protecting what's yours - 7/13/2006 6:33:25 AM   
CrappyDom


Posts: 1883
Joined: 4/11/2006
From: Sacramento
Status: offline
Sinergy,

I often enjoy your posts even if I don't agree with them.   I was starting to agree with this one too.  Nodding my head about how important defusing a confrontation was, who cares what the other idiot thinks, etc.  I once took over a bouncer gig from a guy who was a very serious martial artist with an even more serious ego who had gotten his nose busted and quite.  I was in no way his match but I wasn't dragging around the giant ego.  I would simply point out all the hot chicks to the knuckle dragging thugs and mention if they beat me up they wouldn't be able to come back and hit on them.  So "A" I made it clear to their egos I wasn't threatening them and "B" I pointed out why they should obey me and the rules.  So yes, that portion of your post I agree with.

However, considering the topic and that it is being discussed by people who in general have oversized egos (myself included) I think this has been a very low key discussion.  You are showing off your weapons (in this case the fact you teach self defense) as much as anyone else here and in the exact same manor.

(in reply to IronBear)
Profile   Post #: 169
RE: Weaponry, protecting what's yours - 7/13/2006 9:22:14 AM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline
IB, it's always better to use the actual phallus stead of a weapon representing one...Ha Ha

_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to IronBear)
Profile   Post #: 170
RE: Weaponry, protecting what's yours - 7/13/2006 9:38:09 AM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline
While my ego is very large... I will never deny that, but I have no eggs or a phallus.. poor me! (just kidding)

I didn't take Sinergy's post to mean that everyone that talked about weapons or had weapons was somehow a "Quick Draw McGraw", I thought he was talking about a certain type of gun owner that would shoot first and ask questions later and thinks that a gun is going to trump any other way of defending themselves.. there are other ways.

He would have to explain that line, but I haven't seen him say anything disparaging about anyone here, unless they go around bragging about their guns and how big they are on a daily basis to substitute for some other shortcomming. If you do not fit that category, then why be offended?


_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to CrappyDom)
Profile   Post #: 171
RE: Weaponry, protecting what's yours - 7/13/2006 10:13:05 AM   
Sinergy


Posts: 9383
Joined: 4/26/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Pulpsmack

quote:


I read these posts about weapons and combat skills and whose penis shaped projectile or edged weapon is bigger or more deadly or has greater thrust, and I cannot help but wonder at something.


In all fairness, you do mention quite often how you can tear this up with your bare hands or you pity that person should they ever find themselves toe to toe with you. Overcompensation need not always be a phallic object. That said, sometimes a cigar is just a cigar, especially if such conversation takes place within the relevant fora.

I don't recall measuring bores with the next guy on the this thread but if it's killing you that much to know, "average"... and quite content with what I have

 
quote:

Are the people posting about how much stopping power they are carrying around going through life waiting for somebody to CONTROL THEM by making them actually do their Quick Draw McGraw impression to protect the $6.00 in their wallet?


Well, take a look at the other 3 fingers pointing back at you. It seems you have armed yourself with the knowledge to incapacitate, humilate, even kill another with your body. Do you look for trouble so somebody can control you into doing your Hong Kong Fooie impression to protect your freshly-starched Gi?

You claim to be a sensible person who has learned to fight for recreational, lifestyle, and defensive reasons... one who prefers to be out of harm's way and perhaps trained to help facilitate the ability to be left in peace, or at least survive to live it another day. True or untrue, I don't find this hard to swallow. Why then is it so hard for you to swallow that somebody has elected to do the same, only with a gun? What are you special?  I know of plenty of brown and black belts who thought they just earned a license to be a hard ass and that hard ass was handed to them on the street. I also had a friend who was UFC fighter who was calmer and more benevolent than most people I have ever met. Somebody slapped his girlfriend (I admit I'd be in jail after that, myself). He spun this guy face first to the hood of a car, grabbed his arm and said "You apologize to her". He did and the guy ran off. My friend didn't say it angrily and it looked like his heart rate was static. His restraint was amazing. I have a lot of respect for the martial arts and I wish I had the time in life to learn it. I think it is a valuable tool that like a firearm is very effective in limited instances and is not the answer to everything.

As to your smug attitude about these Quick Draw McGraws it just strikes me as haughty and delusional elitism that your method of defense is somehow superior. The fact is that both forms of defense are valid, effective, and important, and there are there are both sensible people and jerk-offs alike, some where black belts, some gun belts (some both).

I have been involved in a handful of fist-fights and I have had to fire my weapon on one occasion. Every time I fought I would bust my hand (or a few fingers) on somebody's face and I might have returned the favor with my face once or twice as well. There's nothing like losing the full use of your hand for 2-4 weeks. In addition, as you get older and acquire more crap assault and battery charges mean much more, especially in civil court, and especially where moral character is an essential element of your chosen profession. When you carry a gun all desire to mix it up with the loud mouth on Bourbon Street must be curbed... even when he pinches your woman's ass. You are armed with something that could kill, and in a scuffle somebody could make a reach that will turn deadly. When I didn't carry I was young, had nothing to lose, and didn't give a fuck. Not only am I older now, I am armed, and I have the responsibility to ensure nothing escalates by removing myself from the situation at all times possible. The same arrests and civil suits are far worse with a handgun then they are with any fist fight.

Moreover, you can fight every night if your hands heal properly and you can demonstrate that you were on the defense. Not so with a gun... The justified shooter receives a "broken hand" as well after a gunfight. In my state you automatically lose your CCW if within 365 days you used your firearm on more than one occasion... even if both were justified. (apparently they figure you haven't figured out how to avoid confrontation). Even if you have one and only one occurance, they review what you did before, during, and after the shooting and choose to suspend or revoke your license. All of these things up the ante for those who rely on such weapons for defense, compelling the CCW holder to be a safe, responsible and avoidant individual. There are no such governors on fists or feet.   

Also to give your earlier advice its due credit... one hand cannot clap without the other comming against it. Here (amidst that advice) you have thrown some inflammatory words about some who talk about weapons or use them for defense. If I walked away without posting, I wager you would say nothing more about it. However I have reacted to your inflammatory words and now the fight is brought to you, (which I would wager you will avoid, and that suits me fine). I consciously chose to react to any of these anti gun/2nd amendment/CCW posts because it is something I am passionate about and I will not stand for more BS and disinformation. People's complacency and ignorance have already cost us all much with respect to the second amendment ('34', '68', '86','89','94', & '05'). This is my seperate but equal, my abortion, my gay marriage stand and I will not back down from an issue that I am both right (logically) and passionate about. As you can see... I have posted under 20 times in 2 years and more than 10 have been here. When I speak here there is a damn good reason. And more silliness, fear, ignorance and disinformation about guns and (most of) those who use them responsibly will not be passed without my challenge.   



Thank you for responding.

You missed my point, as I suspected you would by couching my post in terms of a cartoon I used to love from my childhood.  People ask me in real life why I am so nice and polite all the time.  My response is that I pick fights for a living and I almost never take my work home with me.

Things you own, end up owning you.  It sounds as if you would rather engage the other person in a fight with a lethal weapon, rather than simply give them your car keys or wallet and have them go away.

In the state of California, a person can strike the first blow if they feel their life is in danger.  This is easier to prove (that he/she felt
their life is in danger) when the person is a small, untrained person, than it would be for a 6'1 self-defense (there is a vast difference between self-defense and martial arts; I have taught both for years in my life) instructor.  So your point that there is no governance on hands or feet is incorrect.

In terms of my comments on weapons, which you have also misinterpreted to mean that I object (I dont) to people having them.  I will respond by saying I do not care how many guns you own.  How an actual fight tends to go down, such as waiting in line at Burger King and a person smashes your drivers side window and sticks a gun in your face.  Comes up to you and sucker punches you while you are punching in your PIN at the atm.  A date which goes bad.  I could go on.  These sorts of assaults, which are more common than home invasion style assaults, are not really ones which skill with a katana, inner knowledge of Boot To Hed Do will be much help with.

What is boils down to are choices.  Fights are scrappy and have a lot of uncertainty and variables where the person in the fight has a very limited amount of time to choose.  While I am reasonably well versed in armed and unarmed fighting, I dont have to prove anything to anybody.  There is a concept used by professional bodyguards known as "Target Denial."  If I am guarding X, and there are 4 people I dont feel good about a block away in our path, I will have us cross the street to avoid them.  Using that logic with myself as the one I am protecting, I dont hang out in skank bars,  I dont go out looking for fights, I dont go down dark alleys at night, and I tend to be aware of my surroundings and who is around me.  This is not because I am uncertain my abilities will let me down.  I dont want to be in a fight in the first place.

Sinergy

_____________________________

"There is a fine line between clever and stupid"
David St. Hubbins "This Is Spinal Tap"

"Every so often you let a word or phrase out and you want to catch it and bring it back. You cant do that, it is gone, gone forever." J. Danforth Quayle


(in reply to Pulpsmack)
Profile   Post #: 172
RE: Weaponry, protecting what's yours - 7/13/2006 10:28:37 AM   
Sinergy


Posts: 9383
Joined: 4/26/2004
Status: offline
Hello A/all,

I work with a guy who is a scrapper.  One day he shows up at work with the side of his face looking like a side of beef.  I look at home and go "gee, man, I hope you gave as good as you got."

He regales me for 10 minutes about the bar fight he was in the night before and the can of whupass he opened on some guy.

It was a great story.  It was not the first time he had a story to tell.

I still cannot help thinking that from a statistical standpoint, there is a non-zero chance in every fight a person is in that the other person will be more psychotic, better armed, better trained, or whatever, than the person fighting.  These non-zero quantities add up.

A person who is not in any fights has a better chance of not meeting the person who will punch their ticket than the person who fights all the time.  There is nothing about that statement that implies fear or cowardice or that I am saying one should always back down when confronted.  In fact, the exact opposite is true.  A person who backs down is assaulted more frequently than one who does not back down but does not escalate the situation either.

Just me, etc.

Sinergy



_____________________________

"There is a fine line between clever and stupid"
David St. Hubbins "This Is Spinal Tap"

"Every so often you let a word or phrase out and you want to catch it and bring it back. You cant do that, it is gone, gone forever." J. Danforth Quayle


(in reply to Pulpsmack)
Profile   Post #: 173
RE: Weaponry, protecting what's yours - 7/13/2006 10:35:16 AM   
JohnWarren


Posts: 3807
Joined: 3/18/2005
From: Delray Beach, FL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinergy
What is boils down to are choices.  Fights are scrappy and have a lot of uncertainty and variables where the person in the fight has a very limited amount of time to choose.  While I am reasonably well versed in armed and unarmed fighting, I dont have to prove anything to anybody.  There is a concept used by professional bodyguards known as "Target Denial."  If I am guarding X, and there are 4 people I dont feel good about a block away in our path, I will have us cross the street to avoid them.  Using that logic with myself as the one I am protecting, I dont hang out in skank bars,  I dont go out looking for fights, I dont go down dark alleys at night, and I tend to be aware of my surroundings and who is around me.  This is not because I am uncertain my abilities will let me down.  I dont want to be in a fight in the first place.

Sinergy


I'll parapharase two close-combat instructors. One was at Quantico and the other was in the Zone.  Both said almost exactly the same thing.  "If you get into a fair knife fight, one of you will be dead and the other will be severely injured.  The essence of using a knife is either to avoid the fight in the first place or to make an attack at such time and under such conditions that the other guy can't respond effectively.  That is the essence of knife fighting."

_____________________________

www.lovingdominant.org

(in reply to Sinergy)
Profile   Post #: 174
RE: Weaponry, protecting what's yours - 7/13/2006 12:02:16 PM   
Pulpsmack


Posts: 394
Joined: 4/15/2004
From: Louisiana
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinergy

Things you own, end up owning you.  It sounds as if you would rather engage the other person in a fight with a lethal weapon, rather than simply give them your car keys or wallet and have them go away.


In part this is true, but you misunderstand the reasoning. Most of us do care to a large extent about the things we have (and I can buy into the Buddhist philosophy regarding attachments). What is more important to me than defending my IPOD however, is the principal of living free from some POS trying to terrorize myself with his trade. It is a principle that I can see the value in staking two lives upon: mine and his. It is not the fact that the IPOD cost $400 and I am putting my life between a weapon and $400 hard earned dollars. NEVERTHELESS... this point is moot as well because such a robbery would be accompanied by the force of great bodily harm or death. If somebody is willing to risk their freedom and life for a possession of mine then I have no idea what else they are capable of or what else they might intend to do. If someone presents the threat of great bodily harm to myself or a loved one I am going to stop them, whether it is a robbery, a mysterious rage, or a personal vendetta. As you can see (and you have overlooked thus far) I might have motivations to shoot somebody because I don't like their face, because I am in love with my shiny possession, and/or because of my principles that I am not going to be a victimized by anybody... BUT ALL OF THIS IS MOOT. The one and only motivation that counts is that I am presented with a seriously dangerous threat and I am going to neutralize that threat. The fact that the other things coincide is pure bonus. If you remove the imminent threat of such harm to myself or a loved one then there is no justifyable cause for deadly force and thus there is no deadly force. If I see somebody popping out of my car with my stereo in his hands I would love to jerk the pistol from the leather, do a quick tap on his knee caps and slowly pull out a of his few teeth with a pair of needle-nose pliers while waiting for the cops to pick this shit up off my lawn. This desire is something I neither would nor could act upon however, because he stole property and did not present a threat to my person. My desire is irrelevant. The law is and unfortunately the SOB (if he knew what was good for him would run off with his new prize).



quote:


In the state of California, a person can strike the first blow if they feel their life is in danger.  This is easier to prove (that he/she felt their life is in danger) when the person is a small, untrained person, than it would be for a 6'1 self-defense (there is a vast difference between self-defense and martial arts; I have taught both for years in my life) instructor.  So your point that there is no governance on hands or feet is incorrect.


In the anomolus state that is California, perhaps but not so in virtually all others (granted you tend to care about what is relevant to your situation, as do I).

quote:

In terms of my comments on weapons, which you have also misinterpreted to mean that I object (I dont) to people having them. 


Actually YOU have misinterpreted things in this case, and I suspect it is because you haven't read what I have written carefully enough. I had already read in a much earlier post that you were "pro 2nd" (if not, at least you were not anti 2nd) and although unquallified, I took/take that at face value. Nevertheless you have made some disparraging remarks about some gun owners which means you were going on a complete tangent or you were referring to some people who posted. You went off on this tirade about "some people" who go on and on about their equipment (likely overcompensating for other "equipment"), and these people are more or less waiting for the moment with excited anticipation so they may use their deadly power against somebody. ALL I did was call you on the fact that that disparraging statement is equally applicable to those who learn martial arts, and not only should you know better, you probably do. Thus, sitting here talking about "some" people with guns on this board who do this and that while turning a blind eye to the martial arts guys on the board who do the very same suggests you are simply an elitist and I called you on that too. Read what I wrote again (more carefully this time)... it's all there.


quote:

I will respond by saying I do not care how many guns you own.  How an actual fight tends to go down, such as waiting in line at Burger King and a person smashes your drivers side window and sticks a gun in your face.  Comes up to you and sucker punches you while you are punching in your PIN at the atm.  A date which goes bad.  I could go on.  These sorts of assaults, which are more common than home invasion style assaults, are not really ones which skill with a katana, inner knowledge of Boot To Hed Do will be much help with.

What is boils down to are choices.  Fights are scrappy and have a lot of uncertainty and variables where the person in the fight has a very limited amount of time to choose.  While I am reasonably well versed in armed and unarmed fighting, I dont have to prove anything to anybody.  There is a concept used by professional bodyguards known as "Target Denial."  If I am guarding X, and there are 4 people I dont feel good about a block away in our path, I will have us cross the street to avoid them.  Using that logic with myself as the one I am protecting, I dont hang out in skank bars,  I dont go out looking for fights, I dont go down dark alleys at night, and I tend to be aware of my surroundings and who is around me.  This is not because I am uncertain my abilities will let me down.  I dont want to be in a fight in the first place.


I don't know who you are responding to with this part because it clearly isn't a proper response to what I have posted, and it's a bit strange as a stand-alone statement, so I am a bit confused here. From what I have gleaned from that passage is that you do things to ensure that you avoid trouble. Again, (assuming this IS a response to something I posted) so do I and that is what I wrote -which you would discover in at least two passages had you read more clearly.

The sad thing about this exchange here and these topics at large (that last passage notwithstanding) is that a good 1/3 of the information is actually agreed upon by two people that don't see all things alike, but the shame is that people are too quick to react and too hesitant to read carefully. If 2 more minutes were spent just processing the words more carefully some of these initial discrepancies would be cleared up saving 5-10 min (on both sides) with these unnecessary rebuttal statements. thus more time and attention could be spent processessing and developing thoughts and responses over the real issues in dispute.

(in reply to Sinergy)
Profile   Post #: 175
RE: Weaponry, protecting what's yours - 7/13/2006 12:41:58 PM   
Sinergy


Posts: 9383
Joined: 4/26/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Pulpsmack
I don't know who you are responding to with this part because it clearly isn't a proper response to what I have posted, and it's a bit strange as a stand-alone statement, so I am a bit confused here. From what I have gleaned from that passage is that you do things to ensure that you avoid trouble. Again, (assuming this IS a response to something I posted) so do I and that is what I wrote -which you would discover in at least two passages had you read more clearly.



Hello A/all,

It is not really a response to anything you have written in particular.  My intent in writing it was more as a general statement about this thread and the direction it has gone.

From my reading of the various posts about "protecting what is mine," I am seeing a great deal of reliance and focus on superior firepower, exotic weaponry, and/or martial fighting talents.  My opinion, for what it is worth, is that the reasons given for being heavily armed tend to follow the sorts of assaults which are flashed before the person's eyes on news broadcasts.  These tend to be statistical outliers, whereas the person beaten up, raped, or killed by somebody they know are so banal (75% of the time this is the case) as to not even be newsworthy.

I teach a class on fighting under the influence of adrenalin.  The students come out the other end of the class being vicious fighters in the style of, what I like to refer to as a cat that doesnt want you to hold it.  I figure their skills are my present or gift to people who assault other people.

Oddly enough, they also come out of the class with a clear sense that the last place they actually want to be is in a fight.  They also come out of the class with the awareness to avoid one in the first place, and the verbal skills to talk their way out of being in one.

Sinergy

_____________________________

"There is a fine line between clever and stupid"
David St. Hubbins "This Is Spinal Tap"

"Every so often you let a word or phrase out and you want to catch it and bring it back. You cant do that, it is gone, gone forever." J. Danforth Quayle


(in reply to Pulpsmack)
Profile   Post #: 176
RE: Weaponry, protecting what's yours - 7/13/2006 12:58:28 PM   
Pulpsmack


Posts: 394
Joined: 4/15/2004
From: Louisiana
Status: offline
Makes a bit more sense now, since it didn't fit very well in the context of what was said earlier.

I cannot agree more that the perception the media would have it's viewers believe is so senseationalistic that it hardly represents reality at all. The media makes a tidy sum in ratings and ad revenue sensationalizing gun use in this country. Their microscopic focus on gang violence in the late 1980s was a leading component in selling the assault weapons ban of 1994 to its proponents in legislature. They asserted that these semi automatic weapons filled the streets, were the weapon of choice of gangs in drive-by shootings, and accounted for an unprecidented amount of crime. Prior to the assault weapons ban these weapons accounted for 4% of weapons crimes (and that number remained 4% despite the ban that was proposed to decrease assault weapons use).  When the ten year ban was about to sunset in 2004 there was a 60 minutes piece covering the weapons. in order to show the destructive capabilities of this weapon They had a peace officer fire an AK-47 into a pile of cynder blocks, which smashed to bits upon impact. This AK-47 was an automatic weapon (machine gun) that was permenantly banned, not a semi-automatic assault weapon, but it was clear they went with it for sensationalistic effect. They also forgot to mention that any deer rifle one would use for hunting matched or exceeded the power of any assault weapon on the books.

(in reply to Sinergy)
Profile   Post #: 177
RE: Weaponry, protecting what's yours - 7/13/2006 5:17:18 PM   
Sinergy


Posts: 9383
Joined: 4/26/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Pulpsmack

Assault weapon stuff.



I completely agree with your point, although from a different perspective.

With society as it is, violence will happen.  If you ban automatic weapons, people will make fertilizer into bombs or throw rocks.
The problem is not the presence of guns or drugs.  I think bans on guns miss the point entirely.  I think bans on drugs miss the point as well.

I have real issues with the Simian In Chief wanting to ban the guns of US citizens.  My response to the adage "An armed society is a polite society" is answered with "Kuwait has 400 thousand citizens and over a million guns" or "Indonesia and Iraq are armed societies," followed by the question "Are those polite societies?"  But that is another thread.

There is a reason people are running around offing each other at record numbers.  The fact most people dont realize is that violence against individuals seldom crosses racial or societal lines. 

Just me, could be wrong, etc.

Sinergy

_____________________________

"There is a fine line between clever and stupid"
David St. Hubbins "This Is Spinal Tap"

"Every so often you let a word or phrase out and you want to catch it and bring it back. You cant do that, it is gone, gone forever." J. Danforth Quayle


(in reply to Pulpsmack)
Profile   Post #: 178
RE: Weaponry, protecting what's yours - 7/14/2006 8:10:55 AM   
Alumbrado


Posts: 5560
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

I am repeating what experts in self defense always state, if someone has a gun on you give up whatever they ask short of going to a second location...

...On Edit, Texas has the most murders and the least restrictive laws I believe


That is what self defense instructors used to teach people...along with things like 'judo chops', as well as  'Don't dress provocatively', and 'never go out alone at night' to women.

The current thinking is more along the lines that one can never assume that an assailant fits a certain stereotype, and one cannot guarantee a safe outcome through compliance.
'Elimination of the threat' is pretty much the self defense standard today...anyone claiming to be an expert in self defense who is actually teaching such outmoded information is doing a very bad thing.

And I suspect that if you look at gun killings per capita in places like DC with theirvery restricive laws, you might want to update that Texas notion as well.

(in reply to juliaoceania)
Profile   Post #: 179
RE: Weaponry, protecting what's yours - 7/14/2006 8:26:49 AM   
IronBear


Posts: 9008
Joined: 6/19/2005
From: Beenleigh, Qld, Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

IB, it's always better to use the actual phallus stead of a weapon representing one...Ha Ha


Of course it is lass and I know you aren't saying that my katana looks like a phalus ermmm well a flattened on maybe..   I was just lightening up the thread a tad...

I have to agree with the comment Alumbrado made about not assuming that people fall into stero types. I made the nistake of tackling a guy trying to break into my car at a pub one night. He whipped of his cloth cap and swung it at my throat. I got my left hand up to protect myself and was sliced to the bone across the backs of four fingers with the razor blades sewn into the peak of his cap. Very typical of weapons which used to be found in the Gorbels district in Glasgow.

Neets and I go out to a club or the like, the first thing I do is to work out the alternative exits and scan the crowds for known trouble makers as well as possible ones. I always sit with my back to a wall and where windows and/or mirrors give me a good alternative to see what is going on. Neets always walks slightly infront of me on my left so that my roight hand is free to use a weapn (I am always armed). It is just as natural as breathing and at least I know that I have a better chance to protect my woman. My mobile phone has the Police emergency number preprogrammed as well as one for Federal Police and a third for another crew if I need them.. Paranoid? Not really it is just a habbit formed over a lifetime of having to take such precautions..




< Message edited by IronBear -- 7/14/2006 8:28:22 AM >


_____________________________

Iron Bear

Master of Bruin Cottage

http://www.bruincottage.org

Your attitude, words & actions are yours. Take responsibility for them and the consequences they incur.

D.I.L.L.I.G.A.F.

(in reply to Alumbrado)
Profile   Post #: 180
Page:   <<   < prev  7 8 [9] 10 11   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master >> RE: Weaponry, protecting what's yours Page: <<   < prev  7 8 [9] 10 11   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109