LadyPact -> RE: Educate me about High Protocol (11/20/2013 11:32:16 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: AthenaSurrenders Thank you all so much for your responses. I'm going to answer in fairly general terms because you've all given such good input, I don't want to offend anyone by not answering their post specifically. (I know that not everyone was keen on the phrase 'high protocol' but I'm going to keep using it for simplicity in typing, hope no one minds) I have to admit that the mental picture I had of 'high protocol' was similar to what Des talked about. Those of you that have high-protocol interactions seem to paint a different picture. The internet-tainted idea I had of it heavily features speech and eye-contact restrictions, lots of kneeling and/or holding of set positions, ritualistic greetings etc. To what extent do these types of things happen? Are these a 'just on special occasions' type of behaviour or a little-and-often sort of thing? This is for My household only. I'm not big on eye contact restrictions, except for one specific ritual or unless it is a specific command. Kneeling is for specific times, too. It's not something that's done all day, every day. With the person that I'm working with now, he has some experience regarding certain positions, but those are more for special occasions or events. For Me, the idea of having protocols and rituals isn't to make life more difficult or impossible to handle day to day life. Most people have more protocols and rituals than they think they do. They just don't call them that. If you know anyone that asks anyone to take off their shoes before entering the house, that's a protocol. Do you and your husband *always* kiss each other and say "I love you" before leaving the house? That's a ritual. quote:
Would you consider someone high protocol if they had a lot of clear expectations but none of those classic/stereotypical things? Could we be high protocol and never once ask permission to speak or leave the room? Or are they certain core behaviours that mean 'high protocol' to you? I might consider somebody to be high protocol without certain standards, but I probably wouldn't call them leather protocol. It's the more formal stuff where I draw the line between high and low. (Very much personal opinion on My part, so don't take it as gospel.) quote:
I'm somewhat fascinated by the concept because I think it would feel very unnatural to me. I feel the flush of embarrassment very easily when told to do things like kneel, crawl, hold a position, or say a certain line during play, because it feels like I am taking on an artificial role (and to be honest, I'm self-conscious because of cripplingly low self-esteem). I would have a hard time conducting a whole relationship where these things featured highly because of that. Undoubtedly I'd also have a hard time exercising that degree of self control. The very fact that it makes me uncomfortable also makes me think that it's something I should explore and challenge myself with, to see if I could focus entirely on obedience and turn off the inner critic. I wish I could be a fly on the wall at a high-protocol event and see how different people behave and handle it. Part of that is because you're not used to it and it's not always been a part of your relationship. [:)] When it's a part of the normal routine, it becomes second nature. It works that way for both sides of the slash, btw.
|
|
|
|