herfacechair -> RE: Dixie Chicks: Radical Chicks? (7/24/2006 3:24:58 PM)
|
EnglishDomNW: Hezbollah did not steal the land. Israel did. Israel did not steal the land that Hezbolla raided to try to kidnap Israelis standing guard at their northern border. Now, if you take my statement, which you quoted, you will see that I mentioned Israel’s northern positions, and the fact that Hezbollah attacked Israel’s northern positions prior t this mess happening. Your point about who stole what is a non issue, here is why: http://www.palestinefacts.org/pf_1948to1967_land_1948.php These lines were agreed upon by the combatants: quote:
At the conclusion of the War of Independence, in 1949, all of the Arab countries who invaded Israel signed cease fire agreements with Israel No stealing going on here, the border with Lebanon was restored to its previous line. Now, which side of Israel did Hezbollah attack from? Which side of Israel are their troops amassing on? The agreed upon territorial boundary with Lebanon perhaps? Also, the Palestinians had an opportunity to have more than what they currently have, but they blew it when they - and their Arab allies - attacked Israel. EnglishDomNW Israel knows what it needs to do too. That is as asinine as saying that the U.S. knows “what it needs to do” to prevent Al-Qaeda from attacking it again, you know, starting with our mass conversion to Bin Laden’s version of radical Islam. Saying that Israel “knows what it needs to do too” is like saying that the U.K. knew what it had to do to prevent Germany from attacking its shipping - like surrendering to the Nazis right off the bat. But the fact of the matter is that Israel was the one that was harassed for months, it is the one that is bending over backwards to secure peace, it has been patient, and now they have dropped their foot. Now that they are on a roll, that they have the upper hand, THEY are the ones that set the terms for when THEY stop. Hezbolla has no other recourse but to meet Israeli demands, or continually get attacked. EnglishDomNW The Palestinians are entitled to make demands. ROTFLMFAO! That is like someone saying that kids have a right to set demands to their parents! They could make demands all they want, the Israelis are entitled to dismiss their demands, especially when it threatens Israel’s existence. All they have to do is recognize Israel’s right to exist, and be satisfied with just the occupied territories. EnglishDomNW It's their land Israel is squatting on. No it is not, it belongs to Israel. Their borders not including the occupied territories are internationally accepted as Israel’s borders. Even the surrounding Arab countries recognize their borders. Had the Palestinians and the surrounding Arab countries accepted the UN proposal, they would have had more than just the occupied territories. Keep in mind that both Jews and Arabs lived in Palestine and considered themselves Palestinians. When Israel was established, many of the next generation started to see themselves as Israelis. EnglishDomNW: Curious that Hamas has no intentions of recognising Israel's right to exist. The Torah refuses to recognise the same thing. The Jewish religion itself refuses to recognise Israel's right to exist. In fact, Israel's very existence today carries with it a very grave response from God Himself just by existing. He will lead the Jews back to Israel, not the Zionists. Do you see how you pawned yourself here? First, there is a difference between something being said in a book that not everybody takes literally, and a charter law that is used to dictate ongoing official organization policy. Second, the last several times that I went to Israel, I lost count of how many times many of the Israelis referred to themselves as Jews. In fact, like Christianity and Islam, there are the hard core devout Jews, the devout Jews, and the non practicing Jews. Third, Zionism, as an ideology, did not come around until the late 19th century. Prior to that, the Jews saw themselves as having a connection with Palestine. Fourth, PLO’s article 15 of their charter calling for the complete liquidation of the “Zionist” presence in Palestine was written in reference to all the Jews in Israel and the Israeli state, despite the fact that not all Jews in Israel support the Zionist ideology. Fifth, show me a specific phrase from the Torah, or from the Jewish faith, that specifically states that Israel “does not” have the right to exist. EnglishDomNW: The Palestinians don't take claim to all of Israel. They take claim to all of Palestine. Palestine, as a country, does not exist. Israel is internationally recognized. The Palestinians take claim to all of Israel, not just the occupied territories. http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/palmatoc1.html http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/images/maps/palmap11.jpg http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/images/maps/palmap9.jpg http://www.pmw.org.il/ (1) Click on “TV-Video Library” (2) Click on “Topic I: Hamas in its own words” (top row as of this posting) (3) Click on “Post-Election Video: Gaza leads to Haifa.” And make note of the following: (A) The mother of a suicide bomber holding her son. She is wearing the headband that her son gave to her prior to his going on his homicide mission. Note the Caption: “The home and homeland is returning through blood.” (B) Scenes of Israeli troops leaving… Caption: “Let the enemies leave the ENTIRE land!” (Emphasis mine) (C) Scene shifting from damage to the Israeli City of Haifa with this caption: “The invaders fled [Gaza], the army of the Jews was defeated” (Note: this statement also shows up earlier, where the mother is looking over her dead son’s body) (D) Scene remains on the Israeli City of Haifa as the caption changes from the one under “(C)” above to this one: “The home and the homeland is returning through blood”. HENCE, the Palestinians stake a claim all of Israel, not just the occupied territories. EnglishDomNW: As pointed out above, they might want to have a discussion with their own God about whether they have a right to exist or not. Because if He says no, who are you to argue? What you pointed out above: “The Torah refuses to recognise the same thing. The Jewish religion itself refuses to recognise Israel's right to exist.” -EnglishDomNW You did not point out any conversation with God. Again, as I have pointed out above, Show me where, in the Torah, it says that Israel does not have a right to exist. EnglishDomNW: See above See question from above, the one asking you to show me a specific quote from the Torah that states that Israel “does not” have a right to exist. EnglishDomNW: Since you're doing quotes:- " If I were an Arab leader, I would never sign an agreement with Israel. It is normal; we have taken their country. It is true God promised it to us, but how could that interest them? Our God is not theirs. There has been Anti-Semitism, the Nazis, Hitler, Auschwitz, but was that their fault? They see but one thing: we have come and we have stolen their country. Why would they accept that?" - David Ben Gurion (the first Israeli Prime Minister) Again, as with the supposed Torah statement “against” the existence of Israel, there is a difference between ONE man’s opinion (which does not dictate ongoing national policy) and an official article in a charter, WHICH DOES dictate ongoing official policy. His views do not represent the general Israeli position, nor did this view represent the general Jewish position just as Pat Buchanan et al don’t represent the general conservative position in the United States. Finally, do you see the bold red part of his comment? Flies in the face of your, “Israel's very existence today carries with it a very grave response from God Himself just by existing,” claims about Israel’s existence doesn’t it? EnglishDomNW: You don't watch the news, do you herfacechair? WRONG. I do watch the news. Have been since 1982. Unlike you; however, I am smart enough to “read between the lines” and research information that the journalists keep away from the general public. Don’t mistake taking as gospel - without question - what criminally biased news organizations such as CNN, BBC, et al, try to force feed the public as “not watching the news much”. I will demonstrate that in my following response… EnglishDomNW: Only today, two Israeli rockets tore into an ambulance carrying wounded Lebaneses civilians to hospital. This was no "stray missile" or "accidental civilian collateral damage". It was a clearly marked, red cross, blue lights flashing ambulance. And I suppose that the news that you were looking at/watching, was fair enough to point out the fact that those fighting Israel tend to do things like use ambulance services to transport rockets/ammunition/combatants, right? And yes, there have been reports of ambulances being used to transport fighters and or their ammunition. As soon as they do that, the ambulance loses its protection under international law. Hezbolla, Hamas, etc, could rectify this problem by NOT using ambulances as military transport. Even the US military’s Rules of Engagement authorize US troops to fire at out of line that ambulances being used to support the enemy’s combat efforts. The moment they abuse their neutrality status by assisting the enemy, they lose their protection. Hezbolla, Hamas, etc, could rectify this problem by NOT using ambulances as military transport. EnglishDomNW: I just can't help wondering how many words of condemnation you would type towards a terrorist organisation that did the same thing to an Israeli ambulance. I suspect I'd still be reading it a week later. Because, unlike the Israelis - who are fighting against their enemy’s abuse of “neutral” services, a terrorist organization does not have respect for the lives of non combatants. HENCE, the difference between the two. Israel is taking out something that is supposed to be “neutral” but is being used to support combat ops, and the terrorists in your scenario would have attacked out of pure disregard for non combatant lives.
|
|
|
|