MisterP61
Posts: 1345
Joined: 10/9/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: AthenaSurrenders This came up on another site. A guy didn't like the new Star Trek movies and said, repeatedly and emphatically, that his childhood had been 'raped'. I called him out, saying simply that it's pretty low to compare a film he didn't like to the trauma of rape. First off, tell the person that South Park already beat him to this line (Indiana Jones and The Kingdom of the Chrystal Skull) and they are way behind their time. quote:
Unsurprisingly, I was referred to as the 'political correctness police' and it was suggested that I don't understand figurative language. Since it's obvious there wasn't a literal rape, I was overreacting. Sorry. <insert sarcasm here> How dare you refer to such a brutal act on a person and misconstrue the "figuretiveness" of it <end sarcasm here>. quote:
I have some pretty strong feelings about this. I feel it's disrespectful to people who have actually been through sexual assault and that by trivializing rape through such casual comparisons and jokes it creates the impression of it being 'not that bad' and somewhat acceptable in our culture. I also think that his dismissal of the fact that it could be offensive is indicative of someone who has never had to worry about sexual assault and really had no concept of what it's like. You know, I think most sensible and/or sensitive actual human beings will agree with this statement. I do not agree with the last part, because I know men who have been raped by other men, so there really is no gender specificity to rape. quote:
Sure people can say whatever they want, but is it really 'political correctness' to suggest that some topics aren't appropriate for casually slinging around? Calling the films 'a pile of shit' would also have been figurative, but without touching on anyone's personal trauma or trivializing a serious crime. I just agree. Horrible film, piece of horse dung, not worth the time, or any other thing works here. Personally,to Me, anyone who saw the first one knows and understands, and even accepts what they (the directors and producers) said about it is a reboot series with the whole time travel thing and changing of how Kirk came to be the captain of the Enterprise. If you do not watch the second one with that in mind, then yeah you won't like it. I think people tend to forget that the actual Star Trek movies were exactly that... movies. That shit really didn't happen. Just saying. quote:
What are your thoughts? Are any topics off-limits, socially? I'm not talking freedom of speech here; I know he has the right to say his childhood memories were raped just as I have the right to call him a cunt (which I did not, for the record). But should we discourage the use of certain topics in jokes and such, or should these things be socially acceptable? Socially acceptable. IMO no, but like you said he has a right to say them, but more importantly, you have the right to feel and say as you do about it. That's the problem with most who will claim "free speech". As long as you don't disagree with the opinion, then you are allotted yours. Disagree and you are being PC or any other crap they can come up with to try to shame you out of your opinion.
_____________________________
Proudly married to the "Diva of Destruction" LadyPact Though the truth may vary, this ship will carry our bodies safe to shore - Of Monsters and Men What is the maximum effective range of an excuse? Zero meters!
|