MrRodgers
Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: TheHeretic quote:
ORIGINAL: dcnovice As we saw in another thread, there's a keen, sometimes heartbreaking, tension between the worthy goal of encouraging independence and the civic need to prevent double-dipping. Resolving that lies, alas, far beyond my ken. And there is a worse unintended consequence than that, DC. Too often, the people who most desperately need help simply don't have the skills and perseverance to get through the hoops of the process, and wind up getting nothing at all because they don't meet some reporting requirement. Meanwhile, those who view welfare aid as a birthright and the family business are working every angle, and first in line for every pilot/test program that comes along. What happens in most jurisdictions is one needs a fixed address in order to receive any benefits and many of the long term poor (homeless) don't have one. In the county I just left back east, the county govt, would provide their post office box for a fixed address so people could get SSI and SS and as far as I know...'free' phone...even medicaid and medicare, Look this country has millions that are very poor and almost unemployable and yes, they are continually dependent on whatever govt. benefits they can get their hands on. However, the amount of money in big subsidies, tax credits and tax advantages offered to the rich who are the vast majority of those that can take advantage...is countless billion$ more than what the poor get and trust me, they live in a culture of dependency and entitlement, while they are not job creators or risk takers. Corporate and capitalist welfare is strong as it ever was and is still growing while welfare for the poor is weak and shrinking.
|