joether
Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: TheHeretic What seems to be missing from your assumptions, Joether, is an acceptance of the most critical fact about President Obama's speeches. Even when he bothers to apply himself to the task of delivering his words well, everyone knows those words are empty. The GOP response will at least come from a fresh face, with a voice few have heard. Yeah, 'empty words'? Who got Osama bin Laden again? Who got the WMDs out of Syria AFTER the Republicans gave the 'ok' to do such a maneuver? How about that Affordable Care Act? The guy makes speeches and has delivered when he can. When he can not, one only has to observe the Republican/Tea Party to see what they were doing to undermine the United States government! Yes, rather than sending in one of their leaders, the Republicans throw in someone that's expendable. That does sounds like the GOP's platform for warzones; why not political warzones? Why isn't Sen. Cantor, The Speaker of the House Mr. Boehner or even Rush Limbaugh giving the rebuttal speech? Last I checked the Democrat's #1 guy has been giving the Democrat's speech for the past five years! Why are the Republican leaders so afraid of giving a speech; putting their money where their mouth is? They got NOTHING to offer this nation. And they know it. The only people that don't, are the 'low information voters' (aka the people that vote Republican/Tea Party). This lady, whom I have little confidence can accomplish anything useful and good for America, has but one chance to turn hearts and minds towards the 'Party of Destruction'.
|