Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Just who determines what is and what is not practical?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Just who determines what is and what is not practical? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Just who determines what is and what is not practical? - 2/20/2014 3:50:20 PM   
MasterCaneman


Posts: 3842
Joined: 3/21/2013
Status: offline
My one and only experience with shine was right after I got home from Basic. Was at a kegger in the mountains, and this old vet poured me a shot glass. I powered that down and thought I was gonna die. "I guess I should have told you to sip it before I handed it to you. That was uncut," he said. Man, it felt like there was a three feet red-hot pole inside of me. Got seriously messed up, passed out, and threw up all over myself. Yes, there were pictures and my buddies drew shit on me. Fuckers. You live and learn. The hard way, sometimes.

< Message edited by MasterCaneman -- 2/20/2014 3:51:18 PM >


_____________________________

Age and treachery will always overcome youth and ambition.

The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting. ~ Sun Tzu

Goddess Wrangler



(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Just who determines what is and what is not practical? - 2/20/2014 3:56:08 PM   
Arldaddy


Posts: 14
Joined: 1/27/2014
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961
My father's family is from the mountains of Western North Carolina.

The area is known for tobacco farms and moonshine, which averages 93 to 99% pure alcohol.



That should read 93% to 96% pure alcohol. Alcohol is hygroscopic and to remove the last (about) 4% of water requires a chemical process. Once you produce 100% pure Alcohol it will only last a few days before it sucks enough water out of the air to return to the 95-96% range.

Found that out the hard way while getting incorrect readings from Absorption Spectroscopy.

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Just who determines what is and what is not practical? - 2/20/2014 3:57:56 PM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterCaneman

My one and only experience with shine was right after I got home from Basic. Was at a kegger in the mountains, and this old vet poured me a shot glass. I powered that down and thought I was gonna die. "I guess I should have told you to sip it before I handed it to you. That was uncut," he said. Man, it felt like there was a three feet red-hot pole inside of me. Got seriously messed up, passed out, and threw up all over myself. Yes, there were pictures and my buddies drew shit on me. Fuckers. You live and learn. The hard way, sometimes.



And your complaint is what exactly?

that you might be a light weight drinker, kinda like your average Air Force puke or a Marine maybe?

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to MasterCaneman)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Just who determines what is and what is not practical? - 2/20/2014 7:04:42 PM   
LookieNoNookie


Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

The One World trade center tower is designed to withstand the impact of aircraft, a truck bomb the size of a fully loaded tractor trailer, chem and bio air filtration system, expensive but in light of the facts, practical.

Engineers routinely design for one, two, even 300 year storms, again deemed practical.

The common philosophy in the two statements is that you plan for the rarity, not the daily occurrence.

Therefore, the following would fall into the idea of practical preventive measures.

1) A howdah, a double barreled large bore pistol worn by hunters while on elephants to use as a weapon of last resort if a lion or tiger attacks the hunter on the back of the elephant.

Reasoning: While the odds slim, this situation may arise in the middle of Texas, Montana or Central Park.

2) Home with 3 foot thick blast proof reinforced concrete walls shielded against EMP, radioactive fallout, chemical warfare agents, bio agents, volcanic dust and super heated atmosphere caused by planetary debris re-entering the atmosphere after a large comet or asteroid strike, and of course all intake vents designed to be tsunami proof just in case the impact is a water impact resulting in a super tsunami capable of coming 500 miles inland.

3) Monster truck just in case some pandemic leaves the high ways and streets packed with abandoned cars.

4) Ge mini guns mounted in gun positions around the upper floor of the house in case of attack by zombies, terrorists, ford fanatics.

5) Whiskey still in the basement in case whiskey is outlawed.

Now I challenge you folks to either prove the above are not needed, or add to the list. Whatever.


This is all valid until proven otherwise.

(Highways is one woid).

(Whiskey is always capitalized....it's a respect issue).

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 24
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Just who determines what is and what is not practical? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.062