zumala -> RE: Why are most female subs overweight? (7/8/2006 10:24:08 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: sirrenders Have to agree with the statement that most of the subs are in the "mooooo category", myself included. Yes, there are many reasons we are overweight and yes our masters still want us. Perhaps this question should be addressed to the dominants. Why do you allow your subs to fall into the "moooo category".. exercise some of that control and make us get in shape. <tons of laughs> Sometimes I think the answer, "I like you the way you are is a cop out"...Perhaps we should do an analysis of the weight issue and find the exact ratio of fat-to-fit subs on this site. There's a little problem with your scientific/analytical proposal. What basis do you propose to utilize in order to determine which subjects (ie submissives) are actually fat/overweight and which are 'fit', recognizing that being underweight does not qualify as 'fit'. Should a 'fit' individual have a certain fat-to-muscle ratio to be placed in that category? By what method shall you determine this ratio when the subjects are not available for testing? Get my point? [;)] quote:
ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant quote:
ORIGINAL: Invictus754 quote:
ORIGINAL: desertdancer Caretaker, thanks to you, I spent a fitful night sobbing because I followed your cruel cruel link and accidentally SHOT a sweet oh so cute dancing hamster... your an evil evil man. * winks* ~one distraught dancer YOU are upset?! I had to read this whole THREAD to find out where to shoot the hampsters! However, target practice on a couple dozen teletubbies put me back into a good mood. [;)] O.K....I've done the hamsters...thanks to the wicked zumala...now, lead me to those teletubbies. Hey, hey now! Don't blame your hampster homicidal tendancies on me! I didn't do anything but sing 'Pop Goes the Weasel'! [:D]
|
|
|
|