Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Republican led "Save American Workers Act"


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Republican led "Save American Workers Act" Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Republican led "Save American Workers Act" - 2/27/2014 5:14:22 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

VW may have been ok with the union but obviously not all the workers were. It's just a shame that the union can't accept that and are whining for a new election.

Actually VW has said they will probably not expand in Chattanooga since the plant didn't unionize since the company board includes union reps who won't approve it.


Of course the union reps won't approve it. They would rather use it to force the union in a plant that already told them they didn't want it. They don't care about the workers who will be effected if new plants don't open. All they care about is getting a foot into the southern states. That's why they won't let the plants have the same workers council that they have in Germany, they don't care about workers, they care about collecting dues.

The worker's council rep on the company's board doesn't care about having workers councils? LOL.


Dom (cough) Ken,

Where in anything he just wrote, did he say such a thing?

Every single word. She didn't bother to understand that the union rep on the company board isn't a UAW rep but the German worker's council rep.

(in reply to LookieNoNookie)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Republican led "Save American Workers Act" - 2/27/2014 5:15:14 PM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

This plan is like putting a bandaid on an arterial bleed.

The affordable care act, as it stands, is the problem. It has cost people the coverage they want to keep, has not significantly lowered costs for lower income families to get insurance, even with the subsidies and pools.

And the public mandate is flat out stupid, because it is gonna punish the lower income brackets.

"Gee dear, what should we do, get medical coverage or pay the (insert bill here)?"

It is bad enough some people have to make a choice under the current system to either buy meds or buy food. And dont go hollering food stamps. I know of one couple who make too damn much to get food stamps and under their current insurance they only pay 15% of the prescription price. Except one medication for their son costs them 200 a month, and the child is on three more just as expensive.

You just gotta love 'free market' health insurance hey ? The only reason the US doesn't have a a federal health insurance corp. like we do for banks, crops, overseas investors and I think...flood insurance is to continue the profiteering.

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Republican led "Save American Workers Act" - 2/27/2014 5:16:24 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Paladinagain

It simply amazes me that even today; all this talk about the cost of health care does not include anything actually regarding the cost of health care.
Instead of talking about how the insurance companies can make more money and take less risk, why not simply make it law that all health providers must make available their price lists. Try walking into a hospital or doctors office and asking them for their price list. This would open health care up to actual competition and lower costs. Let’s actually take a look at why the costs are so high. How does a hospital justify $17 for an aspirin, $12 for an oatmeal breakfast? All healthcare providers are for-profit companies. I find it laughable when I hear of someone "donating" to a hospital.
That’s like a gas station owner asking for donations so he can add a gas pump. LOL
The entire world has simply gone insane and common sense is the main casualty.


The hospital I go to for procedures has a price list posted at admission. The problem is if you are emergent you can't shop around.

(in reply to Paladinagain)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Republican led "Save American Workers Act" - 2/27/2014 5:25:51 PM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

VW may have been ok with the union but obviously not all the workers were. It's just a shame that the union can't accept that and are whining for a new election.

Well that may be but we sure do know that VW and her investors class sure do love and deserve $577 million of corporate food stamps that they don't need to share with the hungry workers. You gotta love that 'free market' [sic] decision. Who got to vote on that ?

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Republican led "Save American Workers Act" - 2/27/2014 5:55:49 PM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline
Save the American's Workers Act ? Slaves were workers.

(in reply to LookieNoNookie)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Republican led "Save American Workers Act" - 2/27/2014 6:49:56 PM   
LookieNoNookie


Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

VW may have been ok with the union but obviously not all the workers were. It's just a shame that the union can't accept that and are whining for a new election.

Actually VW has said they will probably not expand in Chattanooga since the plant didn't unionize since the company board includes union reps who won't approve it.


Of course the union reps won't approve it. They would rather use it to force the union in a plant that already told them they didn't want it. They don't care about the workers who will be effected if new plants don't open. All they care about is getting a foot into the southern states. That's why they won't let the plants have the same workers council that they have in Germany, they don't care about workers, they care about collecting dues.

The worker's council rep on the company's board doesn't care about having workers councils? LOL.


Dom (cough) Ken,

Where in anything he just wrote, did he say such a thing?

Every single word. She didn't bother to understand that the union rep on the company board isn't a UAW rep but the German worker's council rep.


Fascinating.

(I've read it now 7 times....and I don't find anything of the sort).

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Republican led "Save American Workers Act" - 2/27/2014 8:44:03 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

VW may have been ok with the union but obviously not all the workers were. It's just a shame that the union can't accept that and are whining for a new election.

Actually VW has said they will probably not expand in Chattanooga since the plant didn't unionize since the company board includes union reps who won't approve it.


Of course the union reps won't approve it. They would rather use it to force the union in a plant that already told them they didn't want it. They don't care about the workers who will be effected if new plants don't open. All they care about is getting a foot into the southern states. That's why they won't let the plants have the same workers council that they have in Germany, they don't care about workers, they care about collecting dues.

The worker's council rep on the company's board doesn't care about having workers councils? LOL.


Dom (cough) Ken,

Where in anything he just wrote, did he say such a thing?

Every single word. She didn't bother to understand that the union rep on the company board isn't a UAW rep but the German worker's council rep.


Fascinating.

(I've read it now 7 times....and I don't find anything of the sort).

Try again. All those bolded words refer to the worker's council reps on VW's board that she erroneously thought was UAW reps.

(in reply to LookieNoNookie)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Republican led "Save American Workers Act" - 2/28/2014 4:29:25 AM   
LookieNoNookie


Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

VW may have been ok with the union but obviously not all the workers were. It's just a shame that the union can't accept that and are whining for a new election.

Actually VW has said they will probably not expand in Chattanooga since the plant didn't unionize since the company board includes union reps who won't approve it.


Of course the union reps won't approve it. They would rather use it to force the union in a plant that already told them they didn't want it. They don't care about the workers who will be effected if new plants don't open. All they care about is getting a foot into the southern states. That's why they won't let the plants have the same workers council that they have in Germany, they don't care about workers, they care about collecting dues.

The worker's council rep on the company's board doesn't care about having workers councils? LOL.


Dom (cough) Ken,

Where in anything he just wrote, did he say such a thing?

Every single word. She didn't bother to understand that the union rep on the company board isn't a UAW rep but the German worker's council rep.


Fascinating.

(I've read it now 7 times....and I don't find anything of the sort).

Try again. All those bolded words refer to the worker's council reps on VW's board that she erroneously thought was UAW reps.


And again, considering that the workers council on or even off the Board was approved by the Board, welcomed by management at all levels and pursued in fact BY the workers council, that has anything at all to do with your comment of "The worker's council rep on the company's board doesn't care about having workers councils?" exactly how?

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Republican led "Save American Workers Act" - 2/28/2014 5:09:56 AM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

VW may have been ok with the union but obviously not all the workers were. It's just a shame that the union can't accept that and are whining for a new election.

Actually VW has said they will probably not expand in Chattanooga since the plant didn't unionize since the company board includes union reps who won't approve it.


Of course the union reps won't approve it. They would rather use it to force the union in a plant that already told them they didn't want it. They don't care about the workers who will be effected if new plants don't open. All they care about is getting a foot into the southern states. That's why they won't let the plants have the same workers council that they have in Germany, they don't care about workers, they care about collecting dues.

The worker's council rep on the company's board doesn't care about having workers councils? LOL.


I said the union members not the worker's council. You know the ones YOU claimed won't approve it.


_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Republican led "Save American Workers Act" - 2/28/2014 5:17:16 AM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

VW may have been ok with the union but obviously not all the workers were. It's just a shame that the union can't accept that and are whining for a new election.

Actually VW has said they will probably not expand in Chattanooga since the plant didn't unionize since the company board includes union reps who won't approve it.


Of course the union reps won't approve it. They would rather use it to force the union in a plant that already told them they didn't want it. They don't care about the workers who will be effected if new plants don't open. All they care about is getting a foot into the southern states. That's why they won't let the plants have the same workers council that they have in Germany, they don't care about workers, they care about collecting dues.

The worker's council rep on the company's board doesn't care about having workers councils? LOL.


Dom (cough) Ken,

Where in anything he just wrote, did he say such a thing?

Every single word. She didn't bother to understand that the union rep on the company board isn't a UAW rep but the German worker's council rep.



You are correct. I didn't know that. I thought when you said "union rep" you meant union rep. Silly me. But now that it's cleared up, what I do know is the UAW doesn't want a workers council setup here. I also know that all they care about is collecting dues and could give a flying shit about the worker as long as he keeps that cash coming. I know they have outlived their usefulness and need to go the way of the dinosaur. I know that every vote they lose and every state that votes in right to work puts us one step closer to their end.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Republican led "Save American Workers Act" - 2/28/2014 5:21:32 AM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

Try again. All those bolded words refer to the worker's council reps on VW's board that she erroneously thought was UAW reps.



I already explained the error and all those bolded words still refer to the UAW. Just because I misunderstood you doesn't change what I wrote or who I was talking about.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Republican led "Save American Workers Act" - 2/28/2014 11:49:25 AM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

VW may have been ok with the union but obviously not all the workers were. It's just a shame that the union can't accept that and are whining for a new election.

Actually VW has said they will probably not expand in Chattanooga since the plant didn't unionize since the company board includes union reps who won't approve it.


Of course the union reps won't approve it. They would rather use it to force the union in a plant that already told them they didn't want it. They don't care about the workers who will be effected if new plants don't open. All they care about is getting a foot into the southern states. That's why they won't let the plants have the same workers council that they have in Germany, they don't care about workers, they care about collecting dues.

The worker's council rep on the company's board doesn't care about having workers councils? LOL.


Dom (cough) Ken,

Where in anything he just wrote, did he say such a thing?

Every single word. She didn't bother to understand that the union rep on the company board isn't a UAW rep but the German worker's council rep.



You are correct. I didn't know that. I thought when you said "union rep" you meant union rep. Silly me. But now that it's cleared up, what I do know is the UAW doesn't want a workers council setup here. I also know that all they care about is collecting dues and could give a flying shit about the worker as long as he keeps that cash coming. I know they have outlived their usefulness and need to go the way of the dinosaur. I know that every vote they lose and every state that votes in right to work puts us one step closer to their end.

VW specifically invited UAW into the Chattanooga plant to set up the sort of workers councils they have in Germany.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/02/25/us-autos-vw-uaw-idUSBREA1O21S20140225

So you continue to have no idea what you are writing about.

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Republican led "Save American Workers Act" - 2/28/2014 11:52:46 AM   
subrob1967


Posts: 4591
Joined: 9/13/2004
Status: offline
It's kind of obvious to everyone except the dyed in the wool Democrats that the people of Tennessee just don't want the UAW. They object to the UAW trying to strong arm itself into the VW plant, and would like a workers council as long as it's NOT the UAW representing them on the council.

I bolded part of that so even the Democrat UAW supporters would understand what is going on in Tenn.

_____________________________

http://www.extra-life.org/

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Republican led "Save American Workers Act" - 2/28/2014 11:57:19 AM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
Then why did the governor threaten Volkswagen?


C`mon....you claim to be a cop.....




_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to subrob1967)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Republican led "Save American Workers Act" - 2/28/2014 11:58:13 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
I guess sorta like the nutsackers dont understand, America wants Rowe V Wade as the law of the land as it is, ACA fixed, not repealed, no voter id, no defense porking boondoggles, gay marraige,  and so on.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to subrob1967)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Republican led "Save American Workers Act" - 2/28/2014 7:58:19 PM   
LookieNoNookie


Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: subrob1967

It's kind of obvious to everyone except the dyed in the wool Democrats that the people of Tennessee just don't want the UAW. They object to the UAW trying to strong arm itself into the VW plant, and would like a workers council as long as it's NOT the UAW representing them on the council.

I bolded part of that so even the Democrat UAW supporters would understand what is going on in Tenn.


No subrob, that's wrong. There was subversion. There were opposing views, made by (presumptively) those with far too much money, (unfairly and) unduly influencing the campaign.

The fact that the workers turned it down, on their own, of their own volition, making their own minds up as to their future, is beside the point.

(in reply to subrob1967)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Republican led "Save American Workers Act" - 2/28/2014 8:23:32 PM   
graceadieu


Posts: 1518
Joined: 3/20/2008
From: Maryland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59
I guess you just missed the Tennessee governor threatening to take back state incentives from Volkswagen if they unionized.....?


Oh that`s right....you only watch faux news.....you did miss that.....FYI, Volkswagen was ok with unionization....


Didn't VW say they'd build more vehicles there and create more jobs if the plant unionized? And yet the governor still did that, even though it hurt the state's citizens. He'd rather his constituents be unemployed, because the alternative is that some other factory workers might see that they could benefit from collective action.

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Republican led "Save American Workers Act" - 2/28/2014 8:27:25 PM   
graceadieu


Posts: 1518
Joined: 3/20/2008
From: Maryland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

You are correct. I didn't know that. I thought when you said "union rep" you meant union rep. Silly me. But now that it's cleared up, what I do know is the UAW doesn't want a workers council setup here. I also know that all they care about is collecting dues and could give a flying shit about the worker as long as he keeps that cash coming. I know they have outlived their usefulness and need to go the way of the dinosaur. I know that every vote they lose and every state that votes in right to work puts us one step closer to their end.


I don't know all the ins and outs of Tennessee labor laws, but what was reported on the news was that workers councils of the type they have in Germany are illegal there, and UAW is the closest equivalent, which is why VW invited UAW and asked it's workers to unionize.

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Republican led "Save American Workers Act" - 3/1/2014 7:06:27 AM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: graceadieu


quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

You are correct. I didn't know that. I thought when you said "union rep" you meant union rep. Silly me. But now that it's cleared up, what I do know is the UAW doesn't want a workers council setup here. I also know that all they care about is collecting dues and could give a flying shit about the worker as long as he keeps that cash coming. I know they have outlived their usefulness and need to go the way of the dinosaur. I know that every vote they lose and every state that votes in right to work puts us one step closer to their end.


I don't know all the ins and outs of Tennessee labor laws, but what was reported on the news was that workers councils of the type they have in Germany are illegal there, and UAW is the closest equivalent, which is why VW invited UAW and asked it's workers to unionize.


I don't know all the ins and outs either. But I do know that they lost the election and will lie and cry until they manage to get another. I just hope the workers hold to their ideals and keep voting them out. Maybe it will give the northern states an idea or two.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to graceadieu)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Republican led "Save American Workers Act" - 3/1/2014 8:07:23 AM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: graceadieu


quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

You are correct. I didn't know that. I thought when you said "union rep" you meant union rep. Silly me. But now that it's cleared up, what I do know is the UAW doesn't want a workers council setup here. I also know that all they care about is collecting dues and could give a flying shit about the worker as long as he keeps that cash coming. I know they have outlived their usefulness and need to go the way of the dinosaur. I know that every vote they lose and every state that votes in right to work puts us one step closer to their end.


I don't know all the ins and outs of Tennessee labor laws, but what was reported on the news was that workers councils of the type they have in Germany are illegal there, and UAW is the closest equivalent, which is why VW invited UAW and asked it's workers to unionize.

It's not Tennessee but federal labor law. We don't do worker's councils we do unions.

(in reply to graceadieu)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Republican led "Save American Workers Act" Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.125