Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Welfare Queens Galore


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Welfare Queens Galore Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Welfare Queens Galore - 2/28/2014 5:29:47 PM   
Zonie63


Posts: 2826
Joined: 4/25/2011
From: The Old Pueblo
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444
Imo Hitler was mentally insane (whereas Bush II wasn't), Hitler might have been able to win if not for that, imo.. Its not like there weren't attempts to knock him off by some that saw his insanity.. they just weren't successful..


If Hitler was really the half-crazed lunatic that so many people said he was, the war probably would have ended before it got started. Unfortunately for the world, he was actually quite able, and it would take the combined power of the USSR, British Empire, and the USA (among many other nations) to finally bring him down.

With Bush Jr., all we had to do was wait for his term to expire.

quote:


As far as Bush II goes, why/how the hell did he ever become Prez??? he never accomplished anything in his life, any business he started was a failure..


He had good family connections. As always, it's not what you know, it's who you know.

quote:


But I see him as closest to Hitler due to the fact that he brought in the Patriot Act giving the govt the ability to throw anyone they want in jail as a so called "terrorist" without legal representation, a phone call to your family, a trial, for however they want to keep you.. to me that's the definition of a dictatorship.. they have even labeled Assange & Snowden as "terrorists"..


Well, the government has always been a bit too free and easy with the "terrorist" label to suit me, so I won't argue that point.

I guess I was just never entirely convinced that Bush Jr. was really his own man and actually calling the shots. He just fit the suit.

(in reply to tj444)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: Welfare Queens Galore - 2/28/2014 6:01:58 PM   
tj444


Posts: 7574
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

So, anything WalMart gets to build in a particular location that is given to them by local elected officials (who probably think, for some unknown reason, that bringing WalMart into an area is going to be a greater benefit than cost) is bad, huh? Perhaps that beef is with the local elected officials who made those deals, no?

And, just a question: are those tax breaks, or are they subsidies (the two are not the same)?


Yes, personally I have no use for politicians of any level, including local dudes and in particular when its giving handouts to a huge corp like Walmart.. Imo, Walmart would build in that area/location regardless cuz they feel there is a good, growing market there for them, so why give them a subsidy? its a costly (to taxpayers) and unnecessary "cherry on top of the sundae".. They would build there anyway..

you asked the question, I attempted to answer it... since there is no database of all the subsidies, who gets what & for what, there are likely many more that haven't been reported on.. and the group that set up the site & the list has called them "subsidies".. they seem to include a lot of different types of govt handouts (low interest loans, reduced tax, tax holiday) in their reports but that page doesn't break it down to what type, just the amount.. The thing about tax breaks, if it is only given to a few corps in an area and not all of them then its not a tax break to me, its a subsidy cuz they are given something when others in the same classification are not..

_____________________________

As Anderson Cooper said “If he (Trump) took a dump on his desk, you would defend it”

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: Welfare Queens Galore - 2/28/2014 6:28:36 PM   
tj444


Posts: 7574
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63


quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444
Imo Hitler was mentally insane (whereas Bush II wasn't), Hitler might have been able to win if not for that, imo.. Its not like there weren't attempts to knock him off by some that saw his insanity.. they just weren't successful..


If Hitler was really the half-crazed lunatic that so many people said he was, the war probably would have ended before it got started. Unfortunately for the world, he was actually quite able, and it would take the combined power of the USSR, British Empire, and the USA (among many other nations) to finally bring him down.

With Bush Jr., all we had to do was wait for his term to expire.

quote:


As far as Bush II goes, why/how the hell did he ever become Prez??? he never accomplished anything in his life, any business he started was a failure..


He had good family connections. As always, it's not what you know, it's who you know.

quote:


But I see him as closest to Hitler due to the fact that he brought in the Patriot Act giving the govt the ability to throw anyone they want in jail as a so called "terrorist" without legal representation, a phone call to your family, a trial, for however they want to keep you.. to me that's the definition of a dictatorship.. they have even labeled Assange & Snowden as "terrorists"..


Well, the government has always been a bit too free and easy with the "terrorist" label to suit me, so I won't argue that point.

I guess I was just never entirely convinced that Bush Jr. was really his own man and actually calling the shots. He just fit the suit.

Hitler made some serious & stupid mistakes due to his insanity, imo... he tried to go too far too fast at the wrong time (what kind of a sane leader sends ill equipped troops into the Russian winter with summer uniforms???).. those are not mistakes an able sane leader would have made..

Yes, I realize that Bush had family connections, etc but Americans voted for the dangerous idiot (that is what I don't understand).. without those votes he would not have been made Prez.. Imo, I think Bush had a serious hard-on for Iraq and wanted to invade/show them regardless, and 9/11 was the excuse he used..

_____________________________

As Anderson Cooper said “If he (Trump) took a dump on his desk, you would defend it”

(in reply to Zonie63)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: Welfare Queens Galore - 3/1/2014 6:22:57 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
So, anything WalMart gets to build in a particular location that is given to them by local elected officials (who probably think, for some unknown reason, that bringing WalMart into an area is going to be a greater benefit than cost) is bad, huh? Perhaps that beef is with the local elected officials who made those deals, no?
And, just a question: are those tax breaks, or are they subsidies (the two are not the same)?

Yes, personally I have no use for politicians of any level, including local dudes and in particular when its giving handouts to a huge corp like Walmart.. Imo, Walmart would build in that area/location regardless cuz they feel there is a good, growing market there for them, so why give them a subsidy? its a costly (to taxpayers) and unnecessary "cherry on top of the sundae".. They would build there anyway..
you asked the question, I attempted to answer it... since there is no database of all the subsidies, who gets what & for what, there are likely many more that haven't been reported on.. and the group that set up the site & the list has called them "subsidies".. they seem to include a lot of different types of govt handouts (low interest loans, reduced tax, tax holiday) in their reports but that page doesn't break it down to what type, just the amount.. The thing about tax breaks, if it is only given to a few corps in an area and not all of them then its not a tax break to me, its a subsidy cuz they are given something when others in the same classification are not..


They may not build there anyway. That's the thing. They could build in the suburbs, taking income tax, property tax, sales tax, etc. with them. They could build in the next County, or even the next State, if your close to a border. Then, there are the other establishments that build in WalMart outlots that aren't necessarily going to be there anyway.

Yes, you attempted to answer it. I know what the list calls them, and my very first sentence in this thread was that there was no mention of what the subsidies were.

Your definition of a subsidy (as opposed to a tax break) would mean there are an awful lot of subsidies out there, which is not really accurate.


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to tj444)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: Welfare Queens Galore - 3/1/2014 6:35:40 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Lets call them externalities so that we can quit the fucking stupid quibbling that nutsackers so often engage in, rather than admit the problem.  The taxpayers are on the hook for all this shit.


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: Welfare Queens Galore - 3/1/2014 8:24:45 AM   
Zonie63


Posts: 2826
Joined: 4/25/2011
From: The Old Pueblo
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444
Hitler made some serious & stupid mistakes due to his insanity, imo... he tried to go too far too fast at the wrong time (what kind of a sane leader sends ill equipped troops into the Russian winter with summer uniforms???).. those are not mistakes an able sane leader would have made..


Yes, although he probably made even some bigger mistakes later on.

quote:


Yes, I realize that Bush had family connections, etc but Americans voted for the dangerous idiot (that is what I don't understand).. without those votes he would not have been made Prez.. Imo, I think Bush had a serious hard-on for Iraq and wanted to invade/show them regardless, and 9/11 was the excuse he used..


Yes, I often wonder how people like that might get into power. I recognized that the country was gripped by fear and anger during the period after 9/11, so certain policies were accepted at that time. I'm not sure if Iraq was Junior's idea or his father's, and of course, they're both part of the same political machine that has the influence, clout, and wherewithal to get them the votes they need. Getting votes is something that both major parties have made into an art form.

(in reply to tj444)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: Welfare Queens Galore - 3/1/2014 5:09:26 PM   
tj444


Posts: 7574
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63


quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444
Hitler made some serious & stupid mistakes due to his insanity, imo... he tried to go too far too fast at the wrong time (what kind of a sane leader sends ill equipped troops into the Russian winter with summer uniforms???).. those are not mistakes an able sane leader would have made..


Yes, although he probably made even some bigger mistakes later on.


What I have read was in the beginning of the war, it wasn't Hitler that created the military strategies.. it was his Generals that created them and Hitler went along with their plans but as the war went on he stopped relying on their advice.. the winning strategies were no longer being implemented.. he was implementing his own.. that is why the major mistakes that resulted in him losing the war.. He also had a policy of no retreat ever, not even if certain death was the foreseeable inevitable result, no soldier was ever to retreat.. the guy was nuts (which is why some of his Generals eventually tried to kill him)..

Well.. the American voters might have yet another Bush sitting in the Prez thone at some point.. wont that be something to look forward to?

_____________________________

As Anderson Cooper said “If he (Trump) took a dump on his desk, you would defend it”

(in reply to Zonie63)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: Welfare Queens Galore - 3/1/2014 5:13:48 PM   
tj444


Posts: 7574
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

They may not build there anyway. That's the thing. They could build in the suburbs, taking income tax, property tax, sales tax, etc. with them. They could build in the next County, or even the next State, if your close to a border. Then, there are the other establishments that build in WalMart outlots that aren't necessarily going to be there anyway.


depends on how good the market is in each location.. if its a great market then they would be sorta stupid not to build, even without subsidies/tax breaks/govt handouts/whatever ya wanna call them..

_____________________________

As Anderson Cooper said “If he (Trump) took a dump on his desk, you would defend it”

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: Welfare Queens Galore - 3/2/2014 5:47:22 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
They may not build there anyway. That's the thing. They could build in the suburbs, taking income tax, property tax, sales tax, etc. with them. They could build in the next County, or even the next State, if your close to a border. Then, there are the other establishments that build in WalMart outlots that aren't necessarily going to be there anyway.

depends on how good the market is in each location.. if its a great market then they would be sorta stupid not to build, even without subsidies/tax breaks/govt handouts/whatever ya wanna call them..


Right, because there are only one or two places one could build to service a general area.


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to tj444)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: Welfare Queens Galore - 3/2/2014 6:17:27 AM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: subfever
How absurd, that we continue to tolerate this system.


There was no mention of what the subsidies were.

Go to the source of the report and you can look up the various "subsidies" granted. GM has one that is listed as over $1B, but includes a 25-year abatement of property taxes. One has to wonder how that's going to be weighed over the life of the "subsidy."

Also included are tax credits and rebates, which aren't really subsidies.

It's amazing, really, how GM gets billions in "subsidies" and gets a pass, while Big Oil gets $4B total, and is excoriated.

GM and Chrysler get bail outs totally billions and that's okay because of all the jobs it saved in supporting businesses. Yet, when reports like this come out, that's not mentioned.

This is sensationalist journalism. Nothing more. Nothing less.


It's actually quite accurate and every dime they get no matter the form...is a subsidy. Also, these are ONLY state subsidies. GM got a federal govt. 'debtor-in-financing' guarantee that the great and glorious marketplace turned down. Plus, saving the auto companies did save jobs which was an aberration because historically, those bailouts weren't for jobs, it was for investors only...fuck the workers.

You seem to think that because they didn't spend an hour on this and mention every penny to every corp., that its rendered simply sensationalism. Why ? Even the CATO inst. says federal corp. welfare alone, now surpasses $100 billion a year, $30 billion more than ALL of food stamps. Pentagon cost overruns alone, often also outstrip all of food stamps.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: Welfare Queens Galore - 3/2/2014 6:23:24 AM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: subfever

quote:

Also included are tax credits and rebates, which aren't really subsidies.



Then by your perspective, it would stand to reason that folks on Obamacare receiving tax credits to assist paying their health insurance premiums are not being subsidized.

Health care tax credits are actually only partial tax deductions. The subsidies however, are not. They are direct payments on behalf of the insured. But then one must first consider that the insurance industry would not have been on board because those subsidies are necessary for more profits because so many more will be...customers, than otherwise would be.

(in reply to subfever)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: Welfare Queens Galore - 3/2/2014 12:27:58 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: subfever
How absurd, that we continue to tolerate this system.

There was no mention of what the subsidies were.
Go to the source of the report and you can look up the various "subsidies" granted. GM has one that is listed as over $1B, but includes a 25-year abatement of property taxes. One has to wonder how that's going to be weighed over the life of the "subsidy."
Also included are tax credits and rebates, which aren't really subsidies.
It's amazing, really, how GM gets billions in "subsidies" and gets a pass, while Big Oil gets $4B total, and is excoriated.
GM and Chrysler get bail outs totally billions and that's okay because of all the jobs it saved in supporting businesses. Yet, when reports like this come out, that's not mentioned.
This is sensationalist journalism. Nothing more. Nothing less.

It's actually quite accurate and every dime they get no matter the form...is a subsidy. Also, these are ONLY state subsidies. GM got a federal govt. 'debtor-in-financing' guarantee that the great and glorious marketplace turned down. Plus, saving the auto companies did save jobs which was an aberration because historically, those bailouts weren't for jobs, it was for investors only...fuck the workers.
You seem to think that because they didn't spend an hour on this and mention every penny to every corp., that its rendered simply sensationalism. Why ? Even the CATO inst. says federal corp. welfare alone, now surpasses $100 billion a year, $30 billion more than ALL of food stamps. Pentagon cost overruns alone, often also outstrip all of food stamps.


Tax credits or tax rebates aren't subsidies, though, unless they are greater than the amount of taxes paid. You are falling into the trap of thinking that any of a business' income doesn't belong to the business. Any tax reduction isn't a gift of money from government, but a reduction in the amount of it's own money not confiscated by government.

By your definition, every single tax bracket under the top tax bracket is a subsidy. If it's not business's money, then any money a business is allowed to keep (any part of gross income) is a subsidy.

I completely disagree with that line of thinking.

_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 72
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Welfare Queens Galore Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094