DesideriScuri
Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: tj444 quote:
ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri So, anything WalMart gets to build in a particular location that is given to them by local elected officials (who probably think, for some unknown reason, that bringing WalMart into an area is going to be a greater benefit than cost) is bad, huh? Perhaps that beef is with the local elected officials who made those deals, no? And, just a question: are those tax breaks, or are they subsidies (the two are not the same)? Yes, personally I have no use for politicians of any level, including local dudes and in particular when its giving handouts to a huge corp like Walmart.. Imo, Walmart would build in that area/location regardless cuz they feel there is a good, growing market there for them, so why give them a subsidy? its a costly (to taxpayers) and unnecessary "cherry on top of the sundae".. They would build there anyway.. you asked the question, I attempted to answer it... since there is no database of all the subsidies, who gets what & for what, there are likely many more that haven't been reported on.. and the group that set up the site & the list has called them "subsidies".. they seem to include a lot of different types of govt handouts (low interest loans, reduced tax, tax holiday) in their reports but that page doesn't break it down to what type, just the amount.. The thing about tax breaks, if it is only given to a few corps in an area and not all of them then its not a tax break to me, its a subsidy cuz they are given something when others in the same classification are not.. They may not build there anyway. That's the thing. They could build in the suburbs, taking income tax, property tax, sales tax, etc. with them. They could build in the next County, or even the next State, if your close to a border. Then, there are the other establishments that build in WalMart outlots that aren't necessarily going to be there anyway. Yes, you attempted to answer it. I know what the list calls them, and my very first sentence in this thread was that there was no mention of what the subsidies were. Your definition of a subsidy (as opposed to a tax break) would mean there are an awful lot of subsidies out there, which is not really accurate.
_____________________________
What I support: - A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
- Personal Responsibility
- Help for the truly needy
- Limited Government
- Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)
|