RE: Duty to retreat... (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Phydeaux -> RE: Duty to retreat... (4/7/2014 4:40:50 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:


Completely 100% WRONG.
If something has been found to be unconstitutional, congress has NO power to 'fix' it - short of proposing a constitutional amendment and sending it to the states for ratification.


You are right, that is completely one hundred percent wrong. Many times they only need to revise the law within the consitutional framework.


Which as you know is you merely lying and misdirecting again.
Joether's position :

quote:


The problem is when the court makes a decision that is NOT in the best interests of people, how is it corrected?
Congress passes bills. Those bills become law if certain conditions are met (i.e. the President signs the bill into law).

When the court rules that a law is unconstitutional, congress does not have the power to 'fix' the supreme court's decision.
Certainly they may pass other laws - thats self evident.

But Congresses only recourse to 'fix' a supreme court decision is constitutional amendment. As I said.

Or to re-write the bill so that it is constitutional.

Bama.. again. the ability to pass a different law is obvious.
the point is that congress does not have the ability to 'correct' the supreme court. Except via amendment.




BamaD -> RE: Duty to retreat... (4/7/2014 4:53:17 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:


Completely 100% WRONG.
If something has been found to be unconstitutional, congress has NO power to 'fix' it - short of proposing a constitutional amendment and sending it to the states for ratification.


You are right, that is completely one hundred percent wrong. Many times they only need to revise the law within the consitutional framework.


Which as you know is you merely lying and misdirecting again.
Joether's position :

quote:


The problem is when the court makes a decision that is NOT in the best interests of people, how is it corrected?
Congress passes bills. Those bills become law if certain conditions are met (i.e. the President signs the bill into law).

When the court rules that a law is unconstitutional, congress does not have the power to 'fix' the supreme court's decision.
Certainly they may pass other laws - thats self evident.

But Congresses only recourse to 'fix' a supreme court decision is constitutional amendment. As I said.

Or to re-write the bill so that it is constitutional.

Bama.. again. the ability to pass a different law is obvious.
the point is that congress does not have the ability to 'correct' the supreme court. Except via amendment.

Agreed




Page: <<   < prev  13 14 15 16 [17]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125